ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From the Weekend (The thing I was most wrong about this season...)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maryland led by 3 going into the 4th quarter. After Williams had two holding penalties and we turn the ball over on downs while down by 10 Maryland scored with 2:08 to lead by 17. 1:09 left and we scored to make it 10 again. So they only led by 17 for 59 seconds in the 4th quarter.
Nothing I stated was untrue in the post you responded to.
 
That is my point, it’s hard to have progress on offense with the amount of losses on the offensesive line and two different starting quarterbacks. Your offense as s whole pretty much stops and starts with those two components.
It does not excuse every player on the offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TD TX TD VY
I think it’s unfair to judge the improvement, or lack thereof, of this team without mentioning the losses up front and injuries at the QB spot. With all things being constant, I would agree with you but it is not.
How about improvement since the injuries?
 
Definitely right about starting Sam this week. Shane could do major damage if he had time in the pocket, but that is a different team.
Shane can only stare down one receiver, can't time the throw when the receiver breaks, and has a very slow windup
 
stop. Let's not pretend like American kids shoplifting from a high end retail shop in China on a goodwill trip is the same as you are me stealing a pack of baseball cards when we were 15.

But it is hardly an occasion to apologize for the entire human race either.
 
I didn't expect this team to beat USC. I didn't think it would be better than Oklahoma State. Or play in the Big 12 title game.

What I thought about this team was three things ...

1. It would beat Maryland.
2. It would lose two of three against USC, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State.
3. It would improve as the season went along and that by the end of the season, it would be playing its best brand of football, which would allow it to win four of its final five games.

Well, I was wrong about No. 1 and No. 2, yet it feels like the thing I was most wrong about is No. 3.

I thought the thing we'd be saying about this team in November is that none of the teams that caught it in September or early October would want a piece of the Longhorns late in the year.

Oops.

The sign of a well-coached team is constant improvement throughout the season, especially with a young team, but the reality of the 2017 season is that this team isn't making the type of progress that would begin to remotely suggest that Texas is peaking at the end of the season.

Weirdly, this team could still end up winning four of its final five games, with two games left to play, which means that as wrong as I've been, I might end up being right about the thing I feel I was most wrong about.

Nothing feels more 2017 than that.

No. 2 – Let's just get this out of the way ...

Starting Sam Ehlinger on Saturday gives Texas its best chance of leaving Morgantown with a W.

Shane Buechele had a chance to make Ehlinger's performances against Kansas State and Oklahoma a bit of a distant memory, but that is not what has happened in the last three weeks.

No. 3 – A quick thought on attrition ...

One of the things that's been coming out of the grapevine in the last couple weeks is the subject of departures from the program once the season ends.

I'm not going to overwhelm you guys with conversation on the subject of attrition because I've done that several times already this year. I just want to remind everyone of one little stat:

Not including this year's freshman class, 72 of the last 157 players that the Longhorns have signed since 2010 have left the program early, a product of attrition. That's essentially three full recruiting classes worth of departures ... or every other one, essentially.

No one would argue that zero attrition is either helpful, healthy or possible, but the task in front of Tom Herman is to stop the outright flood of departures that sees the program losing double-digit numbers each season. When you wonder each season why the program has 10 seniors on the roster, it's not rocket science. Instead of 40+ transfers in every four-year cycle (which is what Texas has averaged for more than a decade),the number probably needs to be in the 25-30 range.

Texas won't be able to sustain any kind of success until it can stop the bleeding out in the talent base.

Just something to keep in mind heading into the off-season.

No. 4 - The Full Breakdown ...

Here's an updated look at the Texas attrition numbers over the course of the last four years:

2014 (8/15/13-8/14/14)

(13) Aaron Benson (transfer), Joe Bergeron (transfer), Josh Cochran (injuries), Chevoski Collins (dismissed), Deoundrei Davis (transfer), Bryant Jackson (medical), Montrell Meander (dismissed), Chet Moss (dismissed), Jalen Overstreet (dismissed), Kendall Sanders (dismissed), Leroy Scott (dismissed), Kevin Shorter (injuries) and Kendall Thompson (injuries)

2015 (8/15/14-8/14/15)

(11) David Ash (injuries), Duke Catalon (transfer), Cecil Cherry (transfer), Kennedy Estelle (dismissed), Rami Hammad (transfer), Cameron Hampton (transfer), Desmond Harrison (dismissed), Darius James (transfer), M.J. McFarland (transfer), Miles Onyegbule (injuries) and Curtis Riser (transfer)

2016 (8/15/15-8/14/16)

(8) Adrian Colbert (transfer), Bryson Echols (transfer), DeAndre McNeal (transfer), Ryan Newsome (transfer), Derick Roberson (transfer), Jermaine Roberts (transfer), Jake Raulerson (transfer) and Dalton Santos (transfer)

2017 (8/15/16-8/14/17)

(10) Peyton Aucoin (transfer), Jean Delance (transfer), Jordan Elliott (transfer), Erick Fowler (transfer), Brandon Hodges (transfer), Erik Huhn (transfer), Kai Locksley (transfer), Jake Oliver (graduated), Marcel Southall (transfer) and Blake Whiteley (transfer)

Imagine an offensive line that had the likes of Estelle, Hammad, James, Raulerson, Delance and Hodges as options in the line-up.

No. 5 – The elephant in the room ...

The Longhorns had a number of big-time national prospects on hand this weekend in recruiting, including a number of player whose presence would enhance the current 2018 recruiting class.

No matter how well the coaches recruit, no matter how much fun the kids might have on their visits ... the kids that visited will remember this when they go home.



No. 6- Two words for the Texas basketball team ...

Hot damn.

I'm not going to go overboard with hyperbole because we've certainly done that before with this program.

H-o-w-e-v-e-r ...

That was a hell of a first impression. I want to see more of Mo Bamba. I want to see more of Matt Coleman. I want to see more of Dylan Osetkowski.

I want to see more of this.


Bring on New Hampshire on Tuesday. I'm in.

No. 7 – Buy or Sell …
buy_sell.jpg


BUY or SELL: My high level of disgust is appropriate?

(Buy) The program is essentially Dirk Diggler in a parking lot in the 1980s, sometime after Little Bill commits a murder-suicide on New Year's Eve and before the last scene when he's about to make his return to porn. You have every right to be disgusted.

BUY or SELL:This year’s team beats last year's team by two touchdowns or more?

(Sell) It probably wins by a touchdown. The question you'd have to ask is whether this year's offense could take advantage of the easier defense it would be facing. Hard to argue that it would at this point.

BUY or SELL: If UT won the MD game the narrative of this season would be noticeably different.

(Sell) Even if we wiped away that 20-point butt-kicking, this would be a team likely headed to 7-5 instead of 6-6. Changing that game doesn't change the uninspired level of play from this team down the home-stretch, does it?

BUY or SELL: The defense feels the impact of losing Holton Hill against WVU and Tech, causing Texas to lose both games?

(Sell) Texas is going to beat Texas Tech.

BUY or SELL: Ton Herman’s tenure at Texas will ultimately be judged by his ability to recruit offensive linemen in the next two recruiting cycles?

(Sell) Tom Herman is going to be judged by his ability to coach the quarterbacks and linemen he currently has in this program. The incoming prospects from the next two classes won't likely make a monster impact in the next two years, at least not if history is an indicator.

BUY or SELL: Reading OB is a beating, win or lose?

(Sell) Let's cut Texas fans some slack. I haven't seen any couches set on fire in the streets. You don't hear horror stories about the way the fans treat visiting fans. Do they get a little ugly on message boards? Yes. However, that's basically every college football fan base, especially those that are on a decade-long cannonball into an empty pool.

BUY or SELL: Texas finishes with 7/8 wins, signs a top-5 class and has momentum going into a 2018 winnable Big 12 that is losing A TON of starting QBs?

(Sell) I think Texas might finish with seven wins if it wins the bowl game, but I don't see a top-five finish in recruiting and I don't know where all the momentum is coming from. Also, I feel like we leave every year saying the Big 12 is there for the taking the following year, so let's stop assuming that will be the case.

BUY or SELL: Connor Williams is a Longhorn next year?

(Sell) All the buzz behind the scenes is that he's out of here.

BUY or SELL: Kansas is the worst team in the past 25 years to score 27 points at DKR?

(Buy) At first, I thought this question was full of hyperbole, but it turns out that it was hard to find a game that compares. The 1998 Longhorns let a 3-8 New Mexico State team score 36 points and a 3-8 Iowa State team score 33 points. I went all the back to 1990 and couldn't find any other games that featured a team with less than three wins scoring that many points at DKR.

No. 8 – If I had a vote that mattered ...

1. Alabama
2. Miami
3. Oklahoma
4. Clemson
5. Wisconsin
6. Georgia
7. Auburn
8. Ohio State
9. Notre Dame
10. USC

No. 9 – Eternal Randomness of the Spotty Sports Mind …

* Baker Mayfield is not only going to win the Heisman Trophy, he's going to be remembered as the best of the Oklahoma Heisman winners. What a player!

* Miami has won me over in the last two weekends. My goodness, that was total domination against Notre Dame. Impressive.

* I've been skeptical of Georgia and Notre Dame all year and on Saturday they proved my skepticism to be on point. Goodness gracious, both were beaten like they stole something out of their mom's purse.

* The sign of a well-coached team is steady improvement throughout the season. I feel like that's the definition of the Stanford Cardinal under David Shaw.

* Florida State is 3-6 this season. I can't believe I just typed those words.

* The rebirth of Manny Diaz might be the most underrated story of the 2017 season. Good for him. That's an easy guy to root for.

* I'm not saying that the season ended for the Dallas Cowboys on Sunday, but it sure felt like it.

* Damn, the Rams are fun to watch. I'm starting to believe.

* The Eagles are going to have the division won by Thanksgiving.

* I thought the Saints were headed for disaster after week one. To see them at 7-2, my goodness, Drew Brees and Sean Payton have restored their places in the football universe once again. That was a flat ass-kicking they handed to a decent Buffalo team.

* Chaz Green will see Adrian Clayborn in his nightmares for the rest of his life.

* Ignore pretty much everything you think you see in the NBA in November. Say it 100 times if you need to.

* It might just be that Ben Simmons was worth tanking for. I know Astros fans have to feel that way when they watch Carlos Correa.

* I love Bill Walton.


No. 10 – And Finally…

Shout out to the McCallum Knights from a Class of 1994 alum. It's one thing to go 10-0 in the regular season for the first time in 51 years and it's another to do so with the following notches on the belt:

Anderson W 48-28
Austin High W 56-13
Travis W 72-0
Reagan W 61-0

As someone that went 3-6-1 in his senior season and beat none of those teams along the way, I see you young Knights!
Muenster must be a monster in the field
 
but I don't see a top-five finish in recruiting

Texas is already comfortably top 2 in the composite rankings. So are they going to strike out with most of their targets and others below are going to load up for UT to fall down significantly? Doubtful
 
Why? When the offense was so lack luster, why only one series? Him playing 2 series makes no sense. If he's hurt, then he shouldn't have played at all. Especially in a game where it' wasn't essential that he play. If he's not hurt, then he should be playing the whole game.
Herman claims he viewed Sam as being on a pitch count.
 
Coming from a student, the lack of student attendance at games is the university's fault. Those wristband lines are on the opposite side of the stadium and can take over an hour to wait in and many of the students see the lines and leave. I've also seen many students every game being kicked out of wide open sections because they do not have the correct wristbands even though there is no one else within a 20 foot radius of them and the security takes their job way too seriously. The wristband policy is destroying the student section
Interesting.
 
Easier to just admit you exaggerated to make a point than to keep digging.
“that 20-point butt-kicking” = untrue
51-41
I didn't mean to exaggerate.

I was referencing the soundness of the butt-kicking and the emphatic nature of what happened and simply incorrectly worded what I was trying to articulate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THE NUTT
Texas is already comfortably top 2 in the composite rankings. So are they going to strike out with most of their targets and others below are going to load up for UT to fall down significantly? Doubtful
Other schools will rise.

When they do, something must fall, if even only slightly.
 
I didn't mean to exaggerate.

I was referencing the soundness of the butt-kicking and the emphatic nature of what happened and simply incorrectly worded what I was trying to articulate.
I feel like this has gotten super nit-picky. We got our ass kicked by Maryland. That is all Ketch was trying to say.
 
what's the yards per attempt on that number?

Less than half-yard lower than Ehlinger with nearly 10 percentage points higher. With all due respect, if your YPA is 7.3 then 56% completion rate is pretty f'n bad.
 
Can we stop the narrative that Sam played some great game v OU. His QBR was 49. Yes he had moxy and fight and all that stuff. It wasn’t some memorable performance for the ages. By the way Kenny Hill had a 64 v OU yesterday - how did you think he looked?

And I guess we just ignore the 17 v Okie Lite and 27 v USC.

Maybe Sam gives us a better shot this week with all the factors thrown in. Shane is hardly some world beater. But overall he hasn’t been all that good. It’s like the Browns debating who should play QB.

And by the way - what happened to ‘I’’m worried about his long term health he shouldn’t play again this year.”
I tried to tell a couple posters on here that Sam is NOT the savior of the program at QB. Keep looking. He would excel at H-back/FB/TE, but QB, not. Don't fool yourself. Stop drinking the kool-aid now so you don't disappoint yourselves. I pray Rising and/or Thompson can be what we need to lead us back to a place where we are AT LEAST competing with the program up north.
 
Less than half-yard lower than Ehlinger with nearly 10 percentage points higher. With all due respect, if your YPA is 7.3 then 56% completion rate is pretty f'n bad.
Neither quarterback has numbers worth defending.

Other than completion percentage, Buechele's play has fallen into free-fall in basically every important metric at the position.

6.93 yards per attempt is almost impossible to believe.
 
I tried to tell a couple posters on here that Sam is NOT the savior of the program at QB. Keep looking. He would excel at H-back/FB/TE, but QB, not. Don't fool yourself. Stop drinking the kool-aid now so you don't disappoint yourselves. I pray Rising and/or Thompson can be what we need to lead us back to a place where we are AT LEAST competing with the program up north.
Ridiculous.

Not about the savior part, few are prepared to be that, but the rest of it? Rubbish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saltyhorn
watch the game. the rest of us did.

I did. It was a bit sloppy... some miscues on defense that we hadn't seen in a while, but it never felt out of hand.

That makes us 7-3 against the spread this year, with two of those misses coming from the last two games. So, I guess it feels like we are underperforming... but I think we win the next two.

If we are 7-5 I hope the tenor of the board picks up... besides Maryland and TCU, all of our losses could have (and should have) gone the other way.
 
That makes us 7-3 against the spread this year, with two of those misses coming from the last two games. So, I guess it feels like we are underperforming... but I think we win the next two.

Covering the spread is now the bar?
 
3 of 5 wins are against teams with one win and ranked 92, 114, and 123. Also a loss to number 65. Not exactly what we were expecting from Herman. Beat Tech and go to a bowl, lick wounds from this craptastic year and make smart personnel decisions in the off season. If not, all the good will is gone and we start eyeing the next great coach at Texas.

And the other losses were against very good teams and Texas should have won 3 of those against
#3 OU OT
#10 OSU OT
#12 USC OT

#11 TCU was the only bad loss other than Maryland.

This team could easily be a 1 or 2 loss team with a shitty shitty shitty OL.
They won't be looking for another coach soon. I can promise you that.
He will turn it around if and only if he can get an average OL.
If this team us able to run the ball sans QB, they would be very dangerous. But that is a big if.
 
And the other losses were against very good teams and Texas should have won 3 of those against
#3 OU OT
#10 OSU OT
#12 USC OT

#11 TCU was the only bad loss other than Maryland.

This team could easily be a 1 or 2 loss team with a shitty shitty shitty OL.
They won't be looking for another coach soon. I can promise you that.
He will turn it around if and only if he can get an average OL.
If this team us able to run the ball sans QB, they would be very dangerous. But that is a big if.

We aren't 5-5 by accident. FWIW, OU wasn't OT, but one of our Ws was (KSU).
 
No, but it goes to my point that we actually WON against Kansas (wasn't ever really close) and the thread was incredibly negative. So, I can only infer that we didn't win by enough to appease most on here... i.e. the spread.

The reality is we could have beat KU 35-0 and rightly so this board would have said "It's Kansas."
 
I did. It was a bit sloppy... some miscues on defense that we hadn't seen in a while, but it never felt out of hand.

That makes us 7-3 against the spread this year, with two of those misses coming from the last two games. So, I guess it feels like we are underperforming... but I think we win the next two.

If we are 7-5 I hope the tenor of the board picks up... besides Maryland and TCU, all of our losses could have (and should have) gone the other way.
If only they gave out trophies for record against the spread.
 
No, but it goes to my point that we actually WON against Kansas (wasn't ever really close) and the thread was incredibly negative. So, I can only infer that we didn't win by enough to appease most on here... i.e. the spread.
forget negative, which part was untrue?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT