OFFICIAL Playoff Argument Thread- Who's in and Why
- Thread starter clob94
- Start date
I promise you the committee doesn’t want to put this version of Florida state in the playoff and they don’t want to leave Bama out. They are rooting for Louisville or Iowa tonight lol
Too much to read when you’re wrong after the first sentence.
So that win matter or not? If not, then why the **** did committee ever say H2H matters?
txleapd’s halftime shower thoughts…
Michigan is struggling with #16 Iowa at the half.
FSU is struggling with #14 Lousiville at the half.
Texas DOMINATED #18 okie lite the entire game.
There shouldn’t be ANY argument against Texas being in the CFP. If your argument is “it should be the best teams” in support of Bama, then FSU doesn’t deserve to get in. If your argument is “it’s the record that matters” in support FSU, then Bama doesn’t deserve to get in. That’s only logical.
Michigan is struggling with #16 Iowa at the half.
FSU is struggling with #14 Lousiville at the half.
Texas DOMINATED #18 okie lite the entire game.
There shouldn’t be ANY argument against Texas being in the CFP. If your argument is “it should be the best teams” in support of Bama, then FSU doesn’t deserve to get in. If your argument is “it’s the record that matters” in support FSU, then Bama doesn’t deserve to get in. That’s only logical.
Does this make logical sense? If Georgia loses to #8 Alabama, Georgia should fall below Texas #7 since they are both 1 loss teams.
No one I’ve heard has argued that Georgia shouldn’t fall behind Texas. The argument is between putting Texas in over Bama or an undefeated FSU (if they don’t lose this game).
I think so too, since we own the head-to-head against Bama. Jumping them over Texas simply because they’re an SEC team will cause issues, no matter how much they might want to.
Head to head is one data point out of many. It was one game, played three months ago. There are a lot of other factors at play.
SEC may get left out if FSU wins
Does the committee have the guts to do it? In reality and by all the data points they talk about, it would be the correct decision
Does the committee have the guts to do it? In reality and by all the data points they talk about, it would be the correct decision
This is and has been the problem with 4 Teams, too much controversy. I can’t wait until next year when it’s 12 Teams.
Yes. We aren't getting in unless Louisville comes through.
I wouldn't bet my house on it-- but I'd consider it.
NCAA doesn't have anything to do with the CFP or Bowls. Don't see a dime of any of that money.
Why am I the only one who believes UT is a CFP lock? I’m kind of hoping FSU holds on as they would be very beatable if we somehow end up playing them in the CFP.
I’m telling you, the SEC may get shut out. If not, then the CFP committee is a fraudulent organization.
I’m telling you, the SEC may get shut out. If not, then the CFP committee is a fraudulent organization.
Wait....what? The NCAA brings in about $1.2 annually through revenue streams and gives out about 60% to schools. The revenue streams include TV money. If there is 4 playoff teams vs 12 playoff teams- then TV revenue is higher. Thus the NCAA would receive a higher amount due to more playoff games.
I mean, I sat through the clinic several years ago where this topic was discussed. Was I too hungover to take proper notes?
Well you can say what you want about that fsu freshman but that Plummer kid ain't no chip off the old block.
<10% is my guess. I mean- I'm not in the room and I don't know anyone (personally) who is.
Honestly, right now, Bama is a top 4 team. So are Michigan and Washington. The question at 4 is UGA, UT and FSU. I give the edge to Texas, but will the committee?
NCAA only gets money on NCAA events. The only Division 1 NCAA games are the FCS tournament. The CFP and Bowls are independent of the NCAA and only pay out to the conferences and teams. And keep a healthy profit of course.
Similar threads
