I thought we already agreed like two months ago?
Lol....I knew I had an agreement 2months ago....I just never saw where you did....let the most miserable fan warble!
I thought we already agreed like two months ago?
It won't post. It's a pic of Shack walking on the field in flip flops. looks fine
Depends. I don't know if his injury is one that is a danger of being r-injured, or its just about him having enough strength to be able to play at a high level. Most sprains/strains aren't really a re-injury issue, its just about how much weight you can put on them without pain.Seriously......as big as it is, this first one is only one game. Is there a danger of bringing Shack back too early? We need that fat ass( screw you Wickline) this year.
Dang it Longyac- first we tell everybody where we hide Bevo, now you're telling the enemy we will be lining up in an inverted veer formation?
Loose lips sink ship bro.![]()
You do get that if Texas goes run heavy they will be lining up the way Baylor did against NC in the bowl game. It will not be traditional out of the I running.
I'm not being a d!ck when I say this but------ do you think you could fit two years worth of VY or Colt highlights in just 4 minutes of video......?I watched this recently. Gave me a bit more hope for Swoopes to be able to get it done. It is a highlight reel, so only the good throws, but may help those having anxiety about the starting QB situation.
I'm not being a d!ck when I say this but------ do you think you could fit two years worth of VY or Colt highlights in just 4 minutes of video......?
I get that O line is important, but I think we are overselling this just a bit. Our linemen aren't just going to lay down and give ND's line a free run at the QB and RB. They will slow them down enough to get a play off more often than not, and as I said before, this offense is designed to take pressure off the O line in the first place.
It's going to be a challenge at oline early. I can 100% promise you that. Shoring up the middle of the oline doesn't concern me as much with the passing game as it does with running the football. If we are unable to run the ball up the gut with the two big horses we have in the backfield, it could get ugly very quickly. We don't have a shifty Jamaal charles that can get out on the edge and outrun people. Running just off tackle and up the gut will have to be our bread and butter. Baylor had the option of using the pass to set up the run, or running to set up the pass. Granted, Baylor ran the ball a little more than they threw it, but they could sling it around all day if they had to.
We can't do that yet.....
I don't disagree BUT, when was the last time you saw Kirk Johnson making romance taylor or Jamaal charles-like outside runs consistently?Isn't Kirk Johnson supposed to be shifty? And if that becomes an important component of the game plan wouldn't it be sensible to play Heard at QB and let him make plays with his feet?
I don't disagree BUT, when was the last time you saw Kirk Johnson making romance taylor or Jamaal charles-like outside runs consistently?
Hence why it's going to be damn hard for us to run outside with any consistency. And if we can't run outside, we gotta run inside. And if we don't get our middle three on the oline to step up, we in trouble.None of our backs have Taylor or Charles' moves or speed. Warren has good straight line speed and top end speed, really good for his size, and Foreman as well, but they don't have that quick acceleration like Taylor and Charles.
I guess I don't over-complicate things when it comes to OLine/Dline.
To me it really doesn't matter what scheme it is if the OLine is a yard in the backfield. Or vice versa.
If the line totally collapses on every play, sure. On the other hand, you cant expect each linemen to win each battle on every play. That is a Watson strategy. Their best D-lineman is going to be going up against our center, who is either a true-freshman, or worse, a back up to a true freshman. We are going to have to anticipate that this position is going to need some help. But that's called coaching.
The offense, if it is executed correctly, will punish for over commitment, either to the run or to the pass.The Baylor O does just enough running between the tackles to keep the D honest. It is about making the other side's big guys run to sideline, preferable the furtherest one, every 15 seconds with the inside receiver lined up on the numbers and the outside receiver on the sideline yard marks.
The three and outs killed us last year, even without tempo.Tempo excites me and scares me at the same time. I haven't watched alot of Baylor film, watched some Tulsa film from last year, couldn't really find Eastern Illinois or Bowing Green film. They go up tempo and if its a 6 man box they run a majority of the time, 7 man box its a pass a majority of the time. When they went up tempo several plays in a row they seemed to exploit a defense that couldn't get lined up properly. What scares me is if we have three and outs with this up tempo offense.
Speaking of qb's-- is anybody watching hard knocks? Jared Goff can flat out sling the freaking rock. Even Mike Singletary and Eric dickerson are gushing over him. What I wouldn't give to have an arm like that on our squad.
I've always thought Swoopes had the potential in him. It's possible has not had the right system for him so far. Perhaps Gilbert will open that up for him.I watched this recently. Gave me a bit more hope for Swoopes to be able to get it done. It is a highlight reel, so only the good throws, but may help those having anxiety about the starting QB situation.
The ball goes where the defense isn't. Everyone near the line, throw it deep. Everyone backs off, pass it short. Commit an extra man to the box, its a pass, give some help in coverage, its a run.Tempo excites me and scares me at the same time. I haven't watched alot of Baylor film, watched some Tulsa film from last year, couldn't really find Eastern Illinois or Bowing Green film. They go up tempo and if its a 6 man box they run a majority of the time, 7 man box its a pass a majority of the time. When they went up tempo several plays in a row they seemed to exploit a defense that couldn't get lined up properly. What scares me is if we have three and outs with this up tempo offense.
Swoopes is most assuredly not the best option. Strong may have talked himself into thinking he is the safer option to put in on the first offensive series, but even the reports that have Swoopes starting maintain that Buchele is a better passer and moves the chains better.It's not easy when you have to rely on a freshman. Swoopes is probably the best option at qb. Ouch. But if texas wants to compete, and they want to talk like '17 is the year, then you'd have to come into 2017 with an experienced qb or it'll the 4th sub 10 win season in a row.
I'm not sure I fully buy that, however, even Anwar Richardson, who penned the original article about Swoopes starting, has said in radio interviews that this is not about Swoopes being ahead of Buchele. He claims that they are about even, so the staff prefers to let Buchele take the job by his play in games. He claims that this is both to keep Swoopes engaged, who no doubt was going to see playing time at some point anyway, and ease Buchele into the college game.Gilbert is making the call....and everything I've heard lines up with the recent BC articles on O and D post Fall Ball.
Swoopes is most assuredly not the best option. Strong may have talked himself into thinking he is the safer option to put in on the first offensive series, but even the reports that have Swoopes starting maintain that Buchele is a better passer and moves the chains better.
He is going to play and will eventually over take the position this season, it not all gloom and doom Heidi.It's not easy when you have to rely on a freshman. Swoopes is probably the best option at qb. Ouch. But if texas wants to compete, and they want to talk like '17 is the year, then you'd have to come into 2017 with an experienced qb or it'll the 4th sub 10 win season in a row.