Unreal. WSU led by 32 with less than four minutes to play in the 3rd.
One more example of why I’d never, ever want Mike Leach in Austin.
One more example of why I’d never, ever want Mike Leach in Austin.
Leach & WSU choke away 49-17 lead over 0-3 UCLA at home, lose 67-63
- Thread starter BringBackRoyal
- Start date
I just watched the end of that game. Unbelievable. Ucla’s first win of the season.
PAC is weak as we all know but the SEC has been bad this year as well except for Bama and LSU. GA and FL is not good. Don't be surprise to see Mizzou win the east. The Big12 is the best thus far.
I still can’t get over seeing WSU surrender 50 f*cking points in less than 19 minutes of game time. Does anyone know if that’s a modern (i.e., not Georgia Tech-Cumberland era) FBS or P5 record?
I remember watching us drop 28 on Colorado in less than 7:30 after halftime in the 2005 CCG, so I suppose some team has probably managed more than 50 in 19:00, but I can’t recall ever seeing it.
I remember watching us drop 28 on Colorado in less than 7:30 after halftime in the 2005 CCG, so I suppose some team has probably managed more than 50 in 19:00, but I can’t recall ever seeing it.
This, and UCLA/Chip Kelly hadn't done squat so far since he's been there. Where did that come from, and what happened to the Chip Kelly offense from the Oregon days?
I guess I should have checked out the stats on that detonation of Colorado before asking that question.
Texas dropped 56 points on those poor bastards in the span of 19:24 starting at 12:00 in the second quarter. (I thought we had scored more in the first quarter in that game.) So I guess I have seen something like what UCLA did — but 2005 Texas was an all-time great team, and UCLA has been a hapless mess.
Texas dropped 56 points on those poor bastards in the span of 19:24 starting at 12:00 in the second quarter. (I thought we had scored more in the first quarter in that game.) So I guess I have seen something like what UCLA did — but 2005 Texas was an all-time great team, and UCLA has been a hapless mess.
Last edited:
Exactly. It came out of nowhere from a team that had been making Charlie’s offenses at Texas look pretty good by comparison.
Not really following UCLA closely, but I’m guessing Kelly will get things together as he gets players for his system, assuming they grant him enough time. Starting off .200 in your first 15 games is a good way to have your rebuild cut short, though. We’ll see.
Ya that was one of the most epic prison yard beat downs in modern college football history. We played THE absolute perfect game. We played pretty awesome against USC-- but if we had everything go right for us against USC like we did against Colorado, we'd have run USC out of the stadium by 4 TDS.
I keep wondering did Chip Kelly catch the perfect storm when he was at Oregon? His predecessor left him with a lot of talent. Phil Knight is OR version of T Boone Pickens so he didn't have to do any fund raising. But Chip Kelly is not I repeat not a good recruiter he makes no secret that he doesn't like it. With Chip Kelly it's all about his offense and in that sense he's like Art Briles. He's also like Briles in that defense is what somebody else does. But unlike Baylor CK had a good coaching staff when he was in Eugene.
So now he's at UCLA where he didn't inherit what he had at Oregon. He benched most of the players he inherited because with Chip Kelly it's about his system. Want proof? 60 players on the roster are freshman you read that right. We'll see how he does but I have my doubts.
