Just a reminder to all Aggys
- Thread starter clob94
- Start date
Because you lie constantly doesn’t make it true! Just facts! Sorry you don’t have any! Sad! Sorry!
Lulz 79 years in the desert for you this year. We understand your frustration, lesser.
Using your logic, no school, including a&m, gets credit for any NC's "before the modern era".
When your school has sucked its entire existence, I guess you've got to try to find narratives to fit your agenda, lol.
It’s ok. The aggy will be gone soon. You know, when they actually have to play football games. They’re always tough in August.
I have a feeling after Clemson hangs a half a hundred on them, this will be posted on the forum:
"Gee....... it sure is quiet in here. Where'd all the aggys go?".
Little BOBBY.....TEXAS is a Blue Blood no matter how much you keep telling yourself they arent. When u ask anyone outside of TEXAS (and most in TEXAS)which team they have heard of.......its THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS. That team that is top 10 in all time wins.....that team that beat the unbeatable USC in one of the best if not best championship games ever.....that team that has more....... The point is when people think TEXAS they think of a blue blood program. When they think aggy they think of mediocrity and irrelevancy since 1939.....that and their male cheerleaders.
One title in 48 years does not make one think Blue Blood especially when you have had the resources and advantages to win 6-8. Second tier is where you guys fall at least for now.
Here are the top 25 all-time winningest college football programs. Also, a link for who ESPN considers to bet the blueblood programs. Sorry to disappoint you, Bob.
http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...rojans-lead-list-college-football-blue-bloods
Teams ranked by total wins
Updated as of August 4, 2018
The followings list displays the record for all NCAA football programs with 600 or more wins.
Rank Team Won Lost Tied Pct. Games
1 Michigan 943 339 36 .729 1318
2 Yale 902 374 55 .698 1331
3 Ohio State 898 324 53 .725 1275
4 Texas 897 366 33 .705 1296
5 Nebraska 893 380 40 .695 1313
6 Alabama 891 328 43 .723 1262
7 Notre Dame 885 324 42 .724 1272
8 Oklahoma 896 325 53 .724 1274
9 Penn State 878 387 41 .688 1306
10 Harvard 869 393 50 .681 1312
11 Penn 850 491 42 .630 1383
12 USC 834 339 54 .702 1227
13 Tennessee 833 383 53 .677 1269
14 Princeton 822 411 50 .660 1283
15 Georgia 808 420 54 .651 1282
16 LSU 787 412 47 .650 1246
17 Mount Union 784 386 38 .665 1208
18 Wittenberg 764 359 31 .675 1154
19 Auburn 759 436 47 .630 1242
20 West Virginia 742 493 45 .597 1280
21 Virginia Tech 737 466 46 .608 1249
22 Washington & Jefferson 735 390 40 .648 1165
23 Texas A&M 732 477 48 .601 1257
24 Clemson 729 459 45 .609 1233
25 Georgia Tech 728 496 43 .592 1267
http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...rojans-lead-list-college-football-blue-bloods
Teams ranked by total wins
Updated as of August 4, 2018
The followings list displays the record for all NCAA football programs with 600 or more wins.
Rank Team Won Lost Tied Pct. Games
1 Michigan 943 339 36 .729 1318
2 Yale 902 374 55 .698 1331
3 Ohio State 898 324 53 .725 1275
4 Texas 897 366 33 .705 1296
5 Nebraska 893 380 40 .695 1313
6 Alabama 891 328 43 .723 1262
7 Notre Dame 885 324 42 .724 1272
8 Oklahoma 896 325 53 .724 1274
9 Penn State 878 387 41 .688 1306
10 Harvard 869 393 50 .681 1312
11 Penn 850 491 42 .630 1383
12 USC 834 339 54 .702 1227
13 Tennessee 833 383 53 .677 1269
14 Princeton 822 411 50 .660 1283
15 Georgia 808 420 54 .651 1282
16 LSU 787 412 47 .650 1246
17 Mount Union 784 386 38 .665 1208
18 Wittenberg 764 359 31 .675 1154
19 Auburn 759 436 47 .630 1242
20 West Virginia 742 493 45 .597 1280
21 Virginia Tech 737 466 46 .608 1249
22 Washington & Jefferson 735 390 40 .648 1165
23 Texas A&M 732 477 48 .601 1257
24 Clemson 729 459 45 .609 1233
25 Georgia Tech 728 496 43 .592 1267
I think all Aggies should admit Texas is a blueblood program. They are even if I don't like it. We aren't, we are new money for sure.
All Longhorns should admit they are living off the success of their fathers and grandfathers. Will the spoiled third generation kill the golden goose with dildos and sensitivity training. Time will tell.
All Longhorns should admit they are living off the success of their fathers and grandfathers. Will the spoiled third generation kill the golden goose with dildos and sensitivity training. Time will tell.
What is crazy is that the 900th win could come against SC
Also will mean UT is back in the Top 10.
Sounds like something that a blueblood will accomplish
Also will mean UT is back in the Top 10.
Sounds like something that a blueblood will accomplish
Wittenburg, Mount Union, Princeton, Yale, Penn, and Washington & Jefferson kinda make a point. You think somebody at Yale really thinks they have the 2nd best program ever? This all time argument is pretty weak imo.
Is Nebraska still a blue blood program? How long can you be down and still be considered special? Tennesse, I'm looking at you too.
When you play football for 125 years a few down years won't change the narrative of your program historically
Blue blood does not mean elite.
Elite changes year to year.
Blue blood programs are programs that are elite programs more times than not.
Texas is not elite right now but they are a Blue blood
While Clemson is elite right now but they are not a blue blood.
Elite usually means a Top 10 team
What is this again Aggy is talking about regarding UT and the NFL
The NFL has taken notice of UT players from last years teams who are rookies
Chris Warren will be the third undrafted FA to make a NFL roster
This is important for the NFL draft next year and UT players.
Recruits should take notice
The NFL has taken notice of UT players from last years teams who are rookies
Chris Warren will be the third undrafted FA to make a NFL roster
This is important for the NFL draft next year and UT players.
Recruits should take notice
No, and neither is aggy, but Yale has way more wins in their history than a&m.
God, you are dense and obtuse.
Yale stopped playing top level football about 90-100 years ago because of schools like Michigan, Pitt and Penn St could recruit different type of players in that region.
At one time Ivy League football was the best.
Your lack of CFB history is noticeable and it actually helps the argument that you have no idea what you talking about.
"One title in 48 years does not make one think Blue Blood especially when you have had the resources and advantages to win 6-8. Second tier is where you guys fall at least for now"
Im sorry Bob.....soooo what tier does aggy fall into if, in your mind TEXAS is a second tier program?? Im not sure aggy has ever had enough relevancy to be put into a "tier" period......and putting up fake championships on a stadium does not help the National perception of what aggy really is..........irrelevant. So again i ask....what tier is aggy in? It cant be in a tier with the likes of SMU,Ole Miss,TCU,Army, they actually have more titles and more recently than 1939 aggy. What about a tier with the likes of Chicago,Lafayette,Centre,Dartmouth,Navy,
Rutgers.....they all have a championship pre 1940 like aggy so i guess that can be what....tier 5 or 6 or something.
Im sorry Bob.....soooo what tier does aggy fall into if, in your mind TEXAS is a second tier program?? Im not sure aggy has ever had enough relevancy to be put into a "tier" period......and putting up fake championships on a stadium does not help the National perception of what aggy really is..........irrelevant. So again i ask....what tier is aggy in? It cant be in a tier with the likes of SMU,Ole Miss,TCU,Army, they actually have more titles and more recently than 1939 aggy. What about a tier with the likes of Chicago,Lafayette,Centre,Dartmouth,Navy,
Rutgers.....they all have a championship pre 1940 like aggy so i guess that can be what....tier 5 or 6 or something.
Last edited:
I usually just lurk, but I'm jumping in this.
"one title in 48 years" Are you serious? How about 3 title in 50 years, I swear you can't make this stuff up. How about playing for 2 more in the 1970's. How about playing for another in the 80's, how about playing for one just 8 years ago.
That to me is blue blood.
"one title in 48 years" Are you serious? How about 3 title in 50 years, I swear you can't make this stuff up. How about playing for 2 more in the 1970's. How about playing for another in the 80's, how about playing for one just 8 years ago.
That to me is blue blood.
You aggys aren’t even a has been. You’re a never was. Shut your cake holes until you accomplish something for the first time.
Aggy is just upset that TCU has been better for the Big XII than Aggy ever was.
Not just that but Tech was better than them in almost every sport last year.
Seems like Aggy has fallen instead of Aggy becoming number 1 in the state.
Facts do not change Aggy disillusion
Not just that but Tech was better than them in almost every sport last year.
Seems like Aggy has fallen instead of Aggy becoming number 1 in the state.
Facts do not change Aggy disillusion
We have had a better program than UT in the 80’s and 90’s and barring a miracle finish by UT, we will this decade also. That would give us three of four decades!
You're an idiot. No, a&m has not had a better program than Texas three out of four decades. a&m has won nothing of significance during that time period. They did not contend for or play in any national championship games, nor even have any top five finishes. Put the crack pipe down. Texas has been and always will be better than a&m in everything. As soon as you accept that reality, you'll have a much simpler and peaceful life.
Hook'em!
I will give A&M half of that time in the 80's and 90's.
It was pretty much 50/50 during that time with Texas having the better teams in the early 80's and late 90's.
This decade I can say that A&M is ahead based on two years 2012 and 2013.
This is all what you want to judge programs on
I actually enjoy this new found set of balls A&M has found.
As you have seen with recruiting this year UT still maintains a better roster and not to mention a better chance at winning this year
This idea that Aggy has finally gotten out the shadow can and may come crashing down as soon as September hits.
Bob...... for reals, dog....... is your husband/boyfriend out of town and you're lonely and in need of attention?
The need for attention of this magnitude stems from not being breast fed long enough by your mother. How old were you when your mom began denying you her teet?
This level of weapons grade stupidity isn't in your character. You're usually good natured and enjoy joshing, but please don't repeat this drivel on public..... I don't want you to lose what friends you may have.
You lie a lot. Guess you have to ignore reality if you’re an aggy. God it must suck to be you.
But looking at the multiple fake conference and national titles you losers put on your stadium wall, you’re par for the course. aggys are a pack of no accomplishment liars.
Last edited:
Here are the cold hard facts (or reality as Scholz likes to say I ignore)! You guys must all be lawyers. When lawyers are losing on the facts, they pound the table. And when they does not work, they yell, scream, and call names. It is really not even close. The Aggies have been the better program three of the last four decades. Yes, your national championship was a fantastic season. But, one great decade out of 4 does not make you a blue blood. You guys are far more like Tennessee than Alabama or Oklahoma. A really good, but not great program (Blue Blood).
80's
Aggies 71-44-1 3 Conference Championships
Longhorns 73-42-2 1 Conference Championship
Head to Head Aggies 7-3
Advantage: Aggies
90's
Aggies 94-28-2 4 Conference Championships
Longhorns 74-44-2 3 Conference Championships
Head to Head Aggies 6-4
Advantage: Aggies
00's
Aggies 63-59
Longhorns 110-19 2 Conference Championships 1 National Championship
Head to Head Longhorns 8-2
Advantage: Longhorns
10's(8 years to date)
Aggies 67-37
Longhorns 53-48
Head to Head even 1-1
Advantage: Aggies
As you can see, in 3 of the past 4 decades, the Aggies have the advantage. Yes, I am giving this current decade to the Aggies; since we have a 14 game win advantage with 2 years left in this decade.
You're right. It's not close. We were nationally relevant in the 80s, 90s and 2000s. You were not. You resort to putting fake conference titles (2) and fake national titles (2) on your stadium wall. We do not.
- We were a fumbled punt from a national title in '83.
- We were playing for a national title in '90.
- Very close to national title game in '01.
- Won national title in '05.
- Got hosed out of national title game in '08.
- Played for national title in '09.
Again, win something. Until then, shut up, loser.
You really want to look back and see why you had success in the 80's? You really want to die on Jackie Sherrill hill?
You want to die on RC Slocum hill? You know you don't want to go there with me-- on either coach... one recruited me, and I have detailed, intimate knowledge of Jackie and his dealings.
Want to rethink this yet?
You want to die on RC Slocum hill? You know you don't want to go there with me-- on either coach... one recruited me, and I have detailed, intimate knowledge of Jackie and his dealings.
Want to rethink this yet?
clob, why would you hold back? If you have dirt on those two known cheaters, let it fly. I'm about to jettison this guy for being an obtuse jerk anyway.
Aggy being Aggy
At least we all know when you work you put the UT tower up and that pic of DKR Memorial.
Strive to be the best
At least we all know when you work you put the UT tower up and that pic of DKR Memorial.
Strive to be the best
Bobweltlich......i challenge you to google "college football blue bloods" to see where your hypothesis stands on TEXAS being a good college football program but not a blue blood. Check it out and get back to us with your conclusion.....i thank you in advance.
