ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From the Weekend (Development matters, even more than recruiting...)

I didn't even watch the Texas game, just read the updates and box score. Who wants to watch that painful s***. I watched about a third of Dallas game including most of the 4 quarter while making dinner for my kids. I was so unemotional after the last 4 down play, it was kind of scary. I've got no emotions left to invest in either team until changes are made in both head coaches. Otherwise, it will be same old same old.

My sentiments too, although I'm still remotely hopeful that Herman will replace the coaches that need to go with the best of the best available, and get Texas back where it belongs--at or near the top.
Insofar as Jerry hiring the kind of elite coach that could take this very talented team back to the Super Bowl is the day we'll see pigs flying around, which could be any day, right (given the small window of opportunity we have here). Hahaha.
 
$20M to buyout CTH
$3-5M to buyout assistant coaches.
Urban is going to get...$8-10M/year?
Urban's assistants will probably get another $8M/year (Ohio State's staff is getting $7.5M this year).

So year 1 of Urban's reign in fall of 2020 will cost about $40M

I think it really is a money thing

There is no buyout for Urban. There will be a $2-8MM buyout for any other new head coach.

The current coaches are one year deals. No buyouts if we can them now. If we bring in stop gaps and then fire them, that will be $4MM in addl buyouts.

So hiring Urban now is only a $2MM annual increase. The one-time buyouts are the same.
 
ee0e3a40b744e2eebc3b4d949eaa9055x.jpg


Recruiting matters.

You've heard me say it a million times. Pretty much every year (except this year), you've seen me break down the metrics from each NFL Draft in a way that makes things pretty plain for you to see. One of my goals as a long-time recruiting analyst is to make recruiting as transparent as possible in terms of what a commitment means when projecting possible NFL upside when the commitment is actually received.

Well, that's not what this column is about.

Quite the contrary, actually.

Using the same data that I've acquired over the last half-decade, I'm going to present you a new two-letter declaration that needs to reside right next to my "recruiting matters" mantra. Ready for it? Here goes ...

Development matters.

Too often when I've written about the metrics of recruiting through the prism of the Rivals recruiting star system, I think I've focused too much on the success of the higher-ranked prospects and not enough on the failure rate, which potentially paints a picture that might just change the way you look at the importance of having quality coaching.

Using a four-year average of NFL Draft data that I accumulated from 2015-2018 (2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015), I want everyone to take a look at the the Rivals star system in terms of failing to develop into drafted NFL Draft prospects.

Five stars (6.1) - 31.84-percent
High Four Stars (6.0) - 62.04-percent
Mid Four Stars (5.9) - 76.84-percent
Low Four Star (5.8) - 82.75-percent
High Three stars (5.7) - 89.26-percent
Mid Three stars (5.6) - 93.07-percent
Low Four Stars (5.5) - 95.39-percent

The biggest takeaway I want you guys to have from this set of numbers is that while a low four-star prospect projects as a future NFL drafted player at nearly three times the rate of a mid-three star prospect, a prospect with that high of a ranking still fails to develop into an NFL drafted player at a 82.75-percent clip, while the mid-three star prospect checks in with a 93.07-percent failure rate.

Why is all of this important to you as a fan of the Texas football program?

Well, your talent isn't as good as all of the years of highly-ranked prospects might suggest that it is. For years I've been trying to tell everyone that the only recruits that really warrant special attention are those that rank in the national top 70-75 (or so), but in focusing on the top-rated players, the relative smaller margins among the rest of the four stars and all of the three stars seem to get lost along the way and I want that to stop.

When we look at the University of Texas roster, you'll find only nine players on the entire roster that arrived with a ranking in the top two Rivals tiers. Those players are: WR Devin Duvernay (2016 - 6.0), DB Caden Sterns (2018 - 6.1), DB BJ Foster (2018 - 6.0), DB Jalen Green (2018 - 6.0), WR Brennan Eagles (2018 - 6.0), DB Anthony Cook (2018 - 6.0), RB Jordan Whittington (2019 - 6.0), WR Jake Smith (2019 - 6.0) and DB Tyler Owens (2018 - 6.0)

What that means is that the other 70+ scholarship players on the roster all arrive in Austin with a projected 76.84 failure rate at best. What is also means is that when the Longhorns take on a program like Baylor, its advantage over a team that doesn't have a single 6.1 or 6.0-ranked player on its team is relatively meaningless once you get beyond those nine players listed above.

If one player fails to develop into a drafted NFL player at a rate between 76-82-percent and another player fails to develop into an NFL drafted player at a rate between 89-95 percent, we're somewhat splitting hairs about the advantage that exists when one roster has a bunch of four stars and high three stars, while another has a roster full of mostly three stars.

Is there an advantage for the Longhorns on paper? Yes.

Is it relatively minor, especially when the majority of the nine players the Longhorns have that represent the biggest talent advantage are all very young? You bet.

It means that what happens to those players once they enter college and the kind of hands-on development they receive matters significantly.

In dismantling the Longhorns by two scores on Saturday, the Bears didn't pull off some sort of miracle. All that happened is that Baylor's players were coached and developed at much higher levels than the Texas players received from their staff. In a sport where the fine margins are often so significant, it turns out that the Longhorns merely wasted their built-in advantage on paper and the Bears erased their disadvantage with better 365-day preparation.

Recruiting matters, but for most programs outside of the truly nationally elite, it matters less than player development. It makes having the best of the best in the way of coaching/strength and conditioning incredibly important.

When comparing the Longhorns to their competition in the Big 12, the numbers make it clear that what the program is getting from its coaches and developmental staff isn't good enough.

No. 2 - Just to be clear ...

There have been a lot of questions about the dynamics in the Texas locker room and what might be happening behind the scenes that has led to the collapses on the field this season.

It's really as simple as this - Herman's older players seem all-in with the direction of the program, while it seems like the younger players in the program, all of whom were recruited by Herman, seem to have more question marks. When I say "younger players," I'm mostly talking about the players from the 2018 and 2019 recruiting classes.

For some players, there are questions about the relationships with assistant coaches. For some others, playing time is an issue. For some others, it's just a general level of unhappiness.

Herman mentioned coming out of the bye week a couple of weeks ago that he had taken steps to address some of these issues by meeting with individual players on a one-on-one basis during the bye week, but there's likely more work to do on this front.

No. 3 - Five Players I'm Still Thinking About 24 Hours Later ...

Parker Braun - It just hasn't come together for Braun this season like I thought it might. Don't get me wrong, he's still been better than any alternative that the Longhorns would have otherwise had at left guard this season, but he hasn't been the force I thought he'd be. Like every single starting lineman on the roster, regression seems to have occurred this season and perhaps never more than on Saturday against the Bears. The fact that he was escorted back to the locker room in the fourth quarter, even though he was not officially thrown out of the game, speaks volumes about several things.

Chris Brown - The junior might actually be the best performing defensive back on the roster. When he's on the field and healthy, the Longhorns are better for it.

Sam Ehlinger - In terms of efficiency rating, Saturday was the third-worst game of his career and only one of three times he's ever posted a sub-100 rating. Ehlinger has had two of his worst performances in a three-year career in the last four games. Since the start of October, he's posted sub 123 ratings in four of seven games. That's incredibly poor.

Jalen Green - I'm not sure there was a single time in his match-up against Denzel Mims when he didn't either hold or commit pass interference. There might have been times when it wasn't called, but there was always some tugging and pulling on the jersey down the field at a bare minimum.

Juwan Mitchell - Where the hell was he and why didn't he play? Maybe we'll get a definitive answer from Tom Herman on Monday.

No. 4 - The key to Texas basketball this season ...


When Jericho Sims is fully engaged and on, the Longhorns can be more than a handful against really good teams.

When Jericho Sims isn't fully engaged and on, the Longhorns likely won't be more than a handful against really good teams.

For the season, he's averaging 8.5 points and 6.8 rebounds per game, but he's capable of being a double-double type of guy.

No. 5 - One Texas volleyball thought from the weekend ...

After handling Kansas in four sets at home over the weekend, the Longhorns have only one remaining Big 12 match left in the regular-season before the Texas heads into post-season play.

Considering the Longhorns will likely share the regular-season Big 12 crown with Baylor, it feels like these two could have one more match-up left between them this season.

If it happens, it will likely occur in the Final Four or in the national championship game.

tenor.gif


No. 6 - If I had a vote that mattered ...

1. LSU
2. Ohio State
3. Clemson
4. Georgia
5. Alabama
6. Utah
7. Oklahoma
8. Minnesota
9. Michigan
10. Oregon

No. 7 – BUY or SELL …
BUY-SELL.gif


(Sell) For one damn time, the University of Texas needs to flex some damn financial muscle and make the kind of dynamic, big-boy hire that guarantees success. That's not what the Tom Herman hire was. That's not what the Charlie Strong hire was. Those were the best hires available because Texas subscribed to the theory of not being the force that lifts coaching salaries in the sport to the kind of levels that cause academic people to cry out in vain. I don't think Texas will ever be the force I think it should be, but it's what I believe it should aim to be.


(Sell) If the Longhorns moved on from Herman right now, it would mean that Texas will have set more than $30 million on fire in dead coaching money in a shade over 1,000 days. That's just not going to happen, not unless the people who are responsible for these types of decisions completely change their moral codes.


(Sell) I think he's coaching next year somewhere else. Besides, I believe if the Texas admin flinched over "red flag" concerns with Herman, it would fall over itself when vetting Meyer.


(Buy) In a heartbeat.


(Buy) I believe they'll reach out, but LSU will match any offer he receives, which probably makes landing him a pipe-dream.


(Buy) The powers at be will give Herman whatever he needs in terms of money for his coaching staff and in support staff, which nets them at least an 8. Scoring higher than a 9 or 10 would likely mean doing things without a moral compass and that's not UT.


(Sell) There's not a single reason to give the school the benefit of the doubt on this topic.


(Buy) Did the lack of a response from his head-butting Malcolm Roach at midfield yesterday before the game not give that away? Humpty Dumpty needs to be put back together again.


(Sell) Inside Bellmont, they are praying Herman saves them from the extension gaffe it made in the spring.


(Sell) Texas won't lose that many 2020 commitments in my opinion, but the program averages double-digit numbers of attrition every year, so you might want to double your transfer numbers.


(Buy) Yup.


(Sell) The answer to that question is Charlie Strong.


(Sell) I've been watching Texas football closely for more than three decades, went to the University as a student and don't plan on leaving the Austin area anytime soon. My habits ain't changing.


(Sell) Did you just out Sally Brown's handle?;)


(Buy) It's not rocket surgery.


(Buy) His history suggests he'll bunker down with guys he knows and has relationships with. My money is on Larry Fedora being the offensive coordinator next season and under normal circumstances, that would represent one hell of a hire. I just wonder if this program doesn't need someone that's not already here with fingerprints on this year's failure.

No. 8 – Eternal Randomness of the Spotty Sports Mind …

... Oklahoma is just begging to be dethroned as Big 12 champions and I don't think anyone has the spine to pull it off. The Sooners are going to win a fifth straight by default.

... Mike Gundy has very quietly had a very good year.

... Ed Orgeron said this about beating Arkansas on Saturday: "There wasn't going to be a celebration for beating Arkansas, they haven't beaten anyone in a long time." Yikes.

... Call me crazy, but I think Michigan gives Ohio State one hell of a game this weekend.

... Kevin Sumlin is exactly who we thought he was.

... Surprise! The 6-5 Dallas Cowboys struggled to make the key play in any phase of the game against a team the quality of the Patriots. Nothing but fool's gold in silver and blue.

... Frank Gore is officially No. 3 on the NFL's all-time rushing list. That's a real thing.

... Speaking of things that actually happened...


... Luka Doncic has my vote for early season NBA MVP. And he's still just a baby.

... Before they both retire, Patrick Beverly and Russell Westbrook have to be allowed to fight each other in an NBA game without punishment from the commish.

... It wasn't pretty, but it still counts. Liverpool 2 Crystal Palace 1. YNWA.

No. 9 - Two Quick Movie Reviews...

Ford Vs. Ferrari (B)

I've seen this movie called the Dad Movie of the Year and that's probably fair. More than the star-studded acting, which sometimes had me asking questions about the casting of the movie, the thing that stands out from the pack in this movie are all of the bad-ass cars. I'm not even a big car guy and I found myself salivating over some of the greatest cars ever made. That the story stays mostly very true to the facts made me very happy. It was just a well-executed story. Definitely worth the trip.

It's a Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (A)

It's easily one of my favorite movies of the year, as I walked out of the theater wanting to be more like Fred Rogers in every aspect of my life, while also wanting to watch as many of the greatest hits of Mister Rogers on Youtube as I could find. Tom Hanks absolutely nails his role of our childhood hero and the story was incredibly moving. I can see this being a movie that I watch on cable a lot once it makes it there.

No. 10 – And Finally ...


I'm not sure anything touched my heart this week more than this video. Get your tissues ready.

Has anyone else noticed -- the victory celebration post-game of Tom embracing his wife and them walking hand-in-hand across the field. That was very common last season, and I'm realizing now that I'm not sure I've seen it at all this year
 
Try a google search.

Should Mack be allowed to coach?

He shielded Cleve who was a serial sexual harasser of women that worked for Mack and who committed sexual assault on one of Mack’s employees a few feet from Mack’s office. Mack went so far as to threaten to quit if they fired Cleve.

He also shielded Major from a sexual harassment lawsuit - and then promoted him.

At least 18 of Mack’s players that I could count were arrested. Aaron Hernandez was never arrested in college btw.

Is Mack’s covering up sexual assault of a university employee that worked for him acceptable but Urban covering up domestic abuse isn’t?

Just trying to understand your sinner rating system.
 
Should Mack be allowed to coach?

He shielded Cleve who was a serial sexual harasser of women that worked for Mack and who committed sexual assault on one of Mack’s employees a few feet from Mack’s office. Mack went so far as to threaten to quit if they fired Cleve.

He also shielded Major from a sexual harassment lawsuit - and then promoted him.

At least 18 of Mack’s players that I could count were arrested. Aaron Hernandez was never arrested in college btw.

Is Mack’s covering up sexual assault of a university employee that worked for him acceptable but Urban covering up domestic abuse isn’t?

Just trying to understand your sinner rating system.
Mack absolutely should have received more criticism and inspection when that stuff went down. He's protected by the fact that there's not a paper trail of direct cover up, which exists with the situation Urban was suspended over at Ohio State.

All of the sexual misconduct from that era of Texas football warranted more inspection.

You're asking fair questions.

I'm not Mack Brown's protective savior, so if your point is that Mack shouldn't have a job because of it, sure.

I don't believe he's anywhere as dirty as Urban, but he has skeletons for sure.
 
Mack absolutely should have received more criticism and inspection when that stuff went down. He's protected by the fact that there's not a paper trail of direct cover up, which exists with the situation Urban was suspended over at Ohio State.

All of the sexual misconduct from that era of Texas football warranted more inspection.

You're asking fair questions.

I'm not Mack Brown's protective savior, so if your point is that Mack shouldn't have a job because of it, sure.

I don't believe he's anywhere as dirty as Urban, but he has skeletons for sure.

My point is there are no choir boys in college football, and there’s not a whole lotta separation between Urban and Mack. Hell, they’re close friends.

The Urban is trash narrative exists in a vacuum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drunk randoke
There is no buyout for Urban. There will be a $2-8MM buyout for any other new head coach.

The current coaches are one year deals. No buyouts if we can them now. If we bring in stop gaps and then fire them, that will be $4MM in addl buyouts.

So hiring Urban now is only a $2MM annual increase. The one-time buyouts are the same.
Orlando's contract runs until spring of 2020. I think Beck's does also. Position coaches are all year to year, but I don't know what time of year that is. Maybe just a few months each? Still looking at around a $3M if you add in the S&R staff, and all the analysts. Charlie Strong's S&R staff and some analysts had buyouts. Not sure about current staff.

Urban's contract might only be a $2M per year increase (I think it'll be closer to $3.5-4.0. CDC isn't the only one bidding for Urban's services). That still doesn't include Urban's staff. He's been know to have some of the most expensive staffs in the country (at UF and OSU). You don't hire Urban Meyer and then tell him he has to hire the head coach at Pfluegerville to be his DC. You could easily double the current salary for the assistants.

If you fire Herman, you still have to pay him. That's the buyout I was referencing.

So the 2020 season HC salary would cost:
$8M to Urban Meyer
$5M to Herman (might be lower if he finds another job).

Not just the difference in the two head coaches salaries in other words.
 
Development and experience matters!
It would be very interesting if you could put some kind of value on each year of development and experience.
For example, if a year of development and experience was worth 10 percent a year, a player with a ratings of 5.8 coming out of high school with
No experience or development would be expected to perform as a 5.8 level.
1 year experience and development would be expected to perform at a 5.858 level.
2 years experience and development at a 5.91 level.
3 years experience and development at a 5.975 level.
4 years experience and development at a 6.035 level.
5 years experience and development at a 6.095 level.

This applied to the starting roster for each game would give a better view of what to expect for that game.
I don’t know how much experience and development is worth but it seems like each year should be worth something.
Four or five years of experience and development should be worth at lot more than one year.
It is hard to compare development after one or two years to development after four or five years.

Please give this some thought, thanks.



Herman is a fraud...
 
Development and experience matters!
It would be very interesting if you could put some kind of value on each year of development and experience.
For example, if a year of development and experience was worth 10 percent a year, a player with a ratings of 5.8 coming out of high school with
No experience or development would be expected to perform as a 5.8 level.
1 year experience and development would be expected to perform at a 5.858 level.
2 years experience and development at a 5.91 level.
3 years experience and development at a 5.975 level.
4 years experience and development at a 6.035 level.
5 years experience and development at a 6.095 level.

This applied to the starting roster for each game would give a better view of what to expect for that game.
I don’t know how much experience and development is worth but it seems like each year should be worth something.
Four or five years of experience and development should be worth at lot more than one year.
It is hard to compare development after one or two years to development after four or five years.

Please give this some thought, thanks.
you might be the last Herman guy here. hope you end up being right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: msbbo421
ee0e3a40b744e2eebc3b4d949eaa9055x.jpg


Recruiting matters.

You've heard me say it a million times. Pretty much every year (except this year), you've seen me break down the metrics from each NFL Draft in a way that makes things pretty plain for you to see. One of my goals as a long-time recruiting analyst is to make recruiting as transparent as possible in terms of what a commitment means when projecting possible NFL upside when the commitment is actually received.

Well, that's not what this column is about.

Quite the contrary, actually.

Using the same data that I've acquired over the last half-decade, I'm going to present you a new two-letter declaration that needs to reside right next to my "recruiting matters" mantra. Ready for it? Here goes ...

Development matters.

Too often when I've written about the metrics of recruiting through the prism of the Rivals recruiting star system, I think I've focused too much on the success of the higher-ranked prospects and not enough on the failure rate, which potentially paints a picture that might just change the way you look at the importance of having quality coaching.

Using a four-year average of NFL Draft data that I accumulated from 2015-2018 (2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015), I want everyone to take a look at the the Rivals star system in terms of failing to develop into drafted NFL Draft prospects.

Five stars (6.1) - 31.84-percent
High Four Stars (6.0) - 62.04-percent
Mid Four Stars (5.9) - 76.84-percent
Low Four Star (5.8) - 82.75-percent
High Three stars (5.7) - 89.26-percent
Mid Three stars (5.6) - 93.07-percent
Low Four Stars (5.5) - 95.39-percent

The biggest takeaway I want you guys to have from this set of numbers is that while a low four-star prospect projects as a future NFL drafted player at nearly three times the rate of a mid-three star prospect, a prospect with that high of a ranking still fails to develop into an NFL drafted player at a 82.75-percent clip, while the mid-three star prospect checks in with a 93.07-percent failure rate.

Why is all of this important to you as a fan of the Texas football program?

Well, your talent isn't as good as all of the years of highly-ranked prospects might suggest that it is. For years I've been trying to tell everyone that the only recruits that really warrant special attention are those that rank in the national top 70-75 (or so), but in focusing on the top-rated players, the relative smaller margins among the rest of the four stars and all of the three stars seem to get lost along the way and I want that to stop.

When we look at the University of Texas roster, you'll find only nine players on the entire roster that arrived with a ranking in the top two Rivals tiers. Those players are: WR Devin Duvernay (2016 - 6.0), DB Caden Sterns (2018 - 6.1), DB BJ Foster (2018 - 6.0), DB Jalen Green (2018 - 6.0), WR Brennan Eagles (2018 - 6.0), DB Anthony Cook (2018 - 6.0), RB Jordan Whittington (2019 - 6.0), WR Jake Smith (2019 - 6.0) and DB Tyler Owens (2018 - 6.0)

What that means is that the other 70+ scholarship players on the roster all arrive in Austin with a projected 76.84 failure rate at best. What is also means is that when the Longhorns take on a program like Baylor, its advantage over a team that doesn't have a single 6.1 or 6.0-ranked player on its team is relatively meaningless once you get beyond those nine players listed above.

If one player fails to develop into a drafted NFL player at a rate between 76-82-percent and another player fails to develop into an NFL drafted player at a rate between 89-95 percent, we're somewhat splitting hairs about the advantage that exists when one roster has a bunch of four stars and high three stars, while another has a roster full of mostly three stars.

Is there an advantage for the Longhorns on paper? Yes.

Is it relatively minor, especially when the majority of the nine players the Longhorns have that represent the biggest talent advantage are all very young? You bet.

It means that what happens to those players once they enter college and the kind of hands-on development they receive matters significantly.

In dismantling the Longhorns by two scores on Saturday, the Bears didn't pull off some sort of miracle. All that happened is that Baylor's players were coached and developed at much higher levels than the Texas players received from their staff. In a sport where the fine margins are often so significant, it turns out that the Longhorns merely wasted their built-in advantage on paper and the Bears erased their disadvantage with better 365-day preparation.

Recruiting matters, but for most programs outside of the truly nationally elite, it matters less than player development. It makes having the best of the best in the way of coaching/strength and conditioning incredibly important.

When comparing the Longhorns to their competition in the Big 12, the numbers make it clear that what the program is getting from its coaches and developmental staff isn't good enough.

No. 2 - Just to be clear ...

There have been a lot of questions about the dynamics in the Texas locker room and what might be happening behind the scenes that has led to the collapses on the field this season.

It's really as simple as this - Herman's older players seem all-in with the direction of the program, while it seems like the younger players in the program, all of whom were recruited by Herman, seem to have more question marks. When I say "younger players," I'm mostly talking about the players from the 2018 and 2019 recruiting classes.

For some players, there are questions about the relationships with assistant coaches. For some others, playing time is an issue. For some others, it's just a general level of unhappiness.

Herman mentioned coming out of the bye week a couple of weeks ago that he had taken steps to address some of these issues by meeting with individual players on a one-on-one basis during the bye week, but there's likely more work to do on this front.

No. 3 - Five Players I'm Still Thinking About 24 Hours Later ...

Parker Braun - It just hasn't come together for Braun this season like I thought it might. Don't get me wrong, he's still been better than any alternative that the Longhorns would have otherwise had at left guard this season, but he hasn't been the force I thought he'd be. Like every single starting lineman on the roster, regression seems to have occurred this season and perhaps never more than on Saturday against the Bears. The fact that he was escorted back to the locker room in the fourth quarter, even though he was not officially thrown out of the game, speaks volumes about several things.

Chris Brown - The junior might actually be the best performing defensive back on the roster. When he's on the field and healthy, the Longhorns are better for it.

Sam Ehlinger - In terms of efficiency rating, Saturday was the third-worst game of his career and only one of three times he's ever posted a sub-100 rating. Ehlinger has had two of his worst performances in a three-year career in the last four games. Since the start of October, he's posted sub 123 ratings in four of seven games. That's incredibly poor.

Jalen Green - I'm not sure there was a single time in his match-up against Denzel Mims when he didn't either hold or commit pass interference. There might have been times when it wasn't called, but there was always some tugging and pulling on the jersey down the field at a bare minimum.

Juwan Mitchell - Where the hell was he and why didn't he play? Maybe we'll get a definitive answer from Tom Herman on Monday.

No. 4 - The key to Texas basketball this season ...


When Jericho Sims is fully engaged and on, the Longhorns can be more than a handful against really good teams.

When Jericho Sims isn't fully engaged and on, the Longhorns likely won't be more than a handful against really good teams.

For the season, he's averaging 8.5 points and 6.8 rebounds per game, but he's capable of being a double-double type of guy.

No. 5 - One Texas volleyball thought from the weekend ...

After handling Kansas in four sets at home over the weekend, the Longhorns have only one remaining Big 12 match left in the regular-season before the Texas heads into post-season play.

Considering the Longhorns will likely share the regular-season Big 12 crown with Baylor, it feels like these two could have one more match-up left between them this season.

If it happens, it will likely occur in the Final Four or in the national championship game.

tenor.gif


No. 6 - If I had a vote that mattered ...

1. LSU
2. Ohio State
3. Clemson
4. Georgia
5. Alabama
6. Utah
7. Oklahoma
8. Minnesota
9. Michigan
10. Oregon

No. 7 – BUY or SELL …
BUY-SELL.gif


(Sell) For one damn time, the University of Texas needs to flex some damn financial muscle and make the kind of dynamic, big-boy hire that guarantees success. That's not what the Tom Herman hire was. That's not what the Charlie Strong hire was. Those were the best hires available because Texas subscribed to the theory of not being the force that lifts coaching salaries in the sport to the kind of levels that cause academic people to cry out in vain. I don't think Texas will ever be the force I think it should be, but it's what I believe it should aim to be.


(Sell) If the Longhorns moved on from Herman right now, it would mean that Texas will have set more than $30 million on fire in dead coaching money in a shade over 1,000 days. That's just not going to happen, not unless the people who are responsible for these types of decisions completely change their moral codes.


(Sell) I think he's coaching next year somewhere else. Besides, I believe if the Texas admin flinched over "red flag" concerns with Herman, it would fall over itself when vetting Meyer.


(Buy) In a heartbeat.


(Buy) I believe they'll reach out, but LSU will match any offer he receives, which probably makes landing him a pipe-dream.


(Buy) The powers at be will give Herman whatever he needs in terms of money for his coaching staff and in support staff, which nets them at least an 8. Scoring higher than a 9 or 10 would likely mean doing things without a moral compass and that's not UT.


(Sell) There's not a single reason to give the school the benefit of the doubt on this topic.


(Buy) Did the lack of a response from his head-butting Malcolm Roach at midfield yesterday before the game not give that away? Humpty Dumpty needs to be put back together again.


(Sell) Inside Bellmont, they are praying Herman saves them from the extension gaffe it made in the spring.


(Sell) Texas won't lose that many 2020 commitments in my opinion, but the program averages double-digit numbers of attrition every year, so you might want to double your transfer numbers.


(Buy) Yup.


(Sell) The answer to that question is Charlie Strong.


(Sell) I've been watching Texas football closely for more than three decades, went to the University as a student and don't plan on leaving the Austin area anytime soon. My habits ain't changing.


(Sell) Did you just out Sally Brown's handle?;)


(Buy) It's not rocket surgery.


(Buy) His history suggests he'll bunker down with guys he knows and has relationships with. My money is on Larry Fedora being the offensive coordinator next season and under normal circumstances, that would represent one hell of a hire. I just wonder if this program doesn't need someone that's not already here with fingerprints on this year's failure.

No. 8 – Eternal Randomness of the Spotty Sports Mind …

... Oklahoma is just begging to be dethroned as Big 12 champions and I don't think anyone has the spine to pull it off. The Sooners are going to win a fifth straight by default.

... Mike Gundy has very quietly had a very good year.

... Ed Orgeron said this about beating Arkansas on Saturday: "There wasn't going to be a celebration for beating Arkansas, they haven't beaten anyone in a long time." Yikes.

... Call me crazy, but I think Michigan gives Ohio State one hell of a game this weekend.

... Kevin Sumlin is exactly who we thought he was.

... Surprise! The 6-5 Dallas Cowboys struggled to make the key play in any phase of the game against a team the quality of the Patriots. Nothing but fool's gold in silver and blue.

... Frank Gore is officially No. 3 on the NFL's all-time rushing list. That's a real thing.

... Speaking of things that actually happened...


... Luka Doncic has my vote for early season NBA MVP. And he's still just a baby.

... Before they both retire, Patrick Beverly and Russell Westbrook have to be allowed to fight each other in an NBA game without punishment from the commish.

... It wasn't pretty, but it still counts. Liverpool 2 Crystal Palace 1. YNWA.

No. 9 - Two Quick Movie Reviews...

Ford Vs. Ferrari (B)

I've seen this movie called the Dad Movie of the Year and that's probably fair. More than the star-studded acting, which sometimes had me asking questions about the casting of the movie, the thing that stands out from the pack in this movie are all of the bad-ass cars. I'm not even a big car guy and I found myself salivating over some of the greatest cars ever made. That the story stays mostly very true to the facts made me very happy. It was just a well-executed story. Definitely worth the trip.

It's a Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (A)

It's easily one of my favorite movies of the year, as I walked out of the theater wanting to be more like Fred Rogers in every aspect of my life, while also wanting to watch as many of the greatest hits of Mister Rogers on Youtube as I could find. Tom Hanks absolutely nails his role of our childhood hero and the story was incredibly moving. I can see this being a movie that I watch on cable a lot once it makes it there.

No. 10 – And Finally ...


I'm not sure anything touched my heart this week more than this video. Get your tissues ready.

Ketch, I agree with your premise about development. I have a question or two. If high 4 star to mid 3 stars can be developed into a great college player by a great staff then why do we have so much emphasis on class rankings? Wouldn't a great coach get players to end up with higher rankings based on his evaluation?
You are using the NFL as a guide to who became a better player through development. What about the vast majority of college rockstars that never get drafted or get cut in camp? Great article BTW
 
Ketch buy or sell?
Jason Garrett after yesterday's rain soaked fiasco in Foxborough is on his way out by the end of the season?
Finally Jerry Jones sees the light and mellos out and decides to make a big name coaching hire to get the very long suffering Dallas Cowboys fans a coach that they deserve in someone like a Lincoln Riley or maybe an Urban Meyer?
 
I don't understand why you say that Texas will never be the force you think it should be. It has been, at the highest level, in the not distant past. Mack was playing for two and winning one NC, Augie won multiple NCs and Rick had us in the Sweet 16 with some regularity. We will get back there. CDC is a good bet to make it happen.
 
ee0e3a40b744e2eebc3b4d949eaa9055x.jpg


Recruiting matters.

You've heard me say it a million times. Pretty much every year (except this year), you've seen me break down the metrics from each NFL Draft in a way that makes things pretty plain for you to see. One of my goals as a long-time recruiting analyst is to make recruiting as transparent as possible in terms of what a commitment means when projecting possible NFL upside when the commitment is actually received.

Well, that's not what this column is about.

Quite the contrary, actually.

Using the same data that I've acquired over the last half-decade, I'm going to present you a new two-letter declaration that needs to reside right next to my "recruiting matters" mantra. Ready for it? Here goes ...

Development matters.

Too often when I've written about the metrics of recruiting through the prism of the Rivals recruiting star system, I think I've focused too much on the success of the higher-ranked prospects and not enough on the failure rate, which potentially paints a picture that might just change the way you look at the importance of having quality coaching.

Using a four-year average of NFL Draft data that I accumulated from 2015-2018 (2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015), I want everyone to take a look at the the Rivals star system in terms of failing to develop into drafted NFL Draft prospects.

Five stars (6.1) - 31.84-percent
High Four Stars (6.0) - 62.04-percent
Mid Four Stars (5.9) - 76.84-percent
Low Four Star (5.8) - 82.75-percent
High Three stars (5.7) - 89.26-percent
Mid Three stars (5.6) - 93.07-percent
Low Four Stars (5.5) - 95.39-percent

The biggest takeaway I want you guys to have from this set of numbers is that while a low four-star prospect projects as a future NFL drafted player at nearly three times the rate of a mid-three star prospect, a prospect with that high of a ranking still fails to develop into an NFL drafted player at a 82.75-percent clip, while the mid-three star prospect checks in with a 93.07-percent failure rate.

Why is all of this important to you as a fan of the Texas football program?

Well, your talent isn't as good as all of the years of highly-ranked prospects might suggest that it is. For years I've been trying to tell everyone that the only recruits that really warrant special attention are those that rank in the national top 70-75 (or so), but in focusing on the top-rated players, the relative smaller margins among the rest of the four stars and all of the three stars seem to get lost along the way and I want that to stop.

When we look at the University of Texas roster, you'll find only nine players on the entire roster that arrived with a ranking in the top two Rivals tiers. Those players are: WR Devin Duvernay (2016 - 6.0), DB Caden Sterns (2018 - 6.1), DB BJ Foster (2018 - 6.0), DB Jalen Green (2018 - 6.0), WR Brennan Eagles (2018 - 6.0), DB Anthony Cook (2018 - 6.0), RB Jordan Whittington (2019 - 6.0), WR Jake Smith (2019 - 6.0) and DB Tyler Owens (2018 - 6.0)

What that means is that the other 70+ scholarship players on the roster all arrive in Austin with a projected 76.84 failure rate at best. What is also means is that when the Longhorns take on a program like Baylor, its advantage over a team that doesn't have a single 6.1 or 6.0-ranked player on its team is relatively meaningless once you get beyond those nine players listed above.

If one player fails to develop into a drafted NFL player at a rate between 76-82-percent and another player fails to develop into an NFL drafted player at a rate between 89-95 percent, we're somewhat splitting hairs about the advantage that exists when one roster has a bunch of four stars and high three stars, while another has a roster full of mostly three stars.

Is there an advantage for the Longhorns on paper? Yes.

Is it relatively minor, especially when the majority of the nine players the Longhorns have that represent the biggest talent advantage are all very young? You bet.

It means that what happens to those players once they enter college and the kind of hands-on development they receive matters significantly.

In dismantling the Longhorns by two scores on Saturday, the Bears didn't pull off some sort of miracle. All that happened is that Baylor's players were coached and developed at much higher levels than the Texas players received from their staff. In a sport where the fine margins are often so significant, it turns out that the Longhorns merely wasted their built-in advantage on paper and the Bears erased their disadvantage with better 365-day preparation.

Recruiting matters, but for most programs outside of the truly nationally elite, it matters less than player development. It makes having the best of the best in the way of coaching/strength and conditioning incredibly important.

When comparing the Longhorns to their competition in the Big 12, the numbers make it clear that what the program is getting from its coaches and developmental staff isn't good enough.

No. 2 - Just to be clear ...

There have been a lot of questions about the dynamics in the Texas locker room and what might be happening behind the scenes that has led to the collapses on the field this season.

It's really as simple as this - Herman's older players seem all-in with the direction of the program, while it seems like the younger players in the program, all of whom were recruited by Herman, seem to have more question marks. When I say "younger players," I'm mostly talking about the players from the 2018 and 2019 recruiting classes.

For some players, there are questions about the relationships with assistant coaches. For some others, playing time is an issue. For some others, it's just a general level of unhappiness.

Herman mentioned coming out of the bye week a couple of weeks ago that he had taken steps to address some of these issues by meeting with individual players on a one-on-one basis during the bye week, but there's likely more work to do on this front.

No. 3 - Five Players I'm Still Thinking About 24 Hours Later ...

Parker Braun - It just hasn't come together for Braun this season like I thought it might. Don't get me wrong, he's still been better than any alternative that the Longhorns would have otherwise had at left guard this season, but he hasn't been the force I thought he'd be. Like every single starting lineman on the roster, regression seems to have occurred this season and perhaps never more than on Saturday against the Bears. The fact that he was escorted back to the locker room in the fourth quarter, even though he was not officially thrown out of the game, speaks volumes about several things.

Chris Brown - The junior might actually be the best performing defensive back on the roster. When he's on the field and healthy, the Longhorns are better for it.

Sam Ehlinger - In terms of efficiency rating, Saturday was the third-worst game of his career and only one of three times he's ever posted a sub-100 rating. Ehlinger has had two of his worst performances in a three-year career in the last four games. Since the start of October, he's posted sub 123 ratings in four of seven games. That's incredibly poor.

Jalen Green - I'm not sure there was a single time in his match-up against Denzel Mims when he didn't either hold or commit pass interference. There might have been times when it wasn't called, but there was always some tugging and pulling on the jersey down the field at a bare minimum.

Juwan Mitchell - Where the hell was he and why didn't he play? Maybe we'll get a definitive answer from Tom Herman on Monday.

No. 4 - The key to Texas basketball this season ...


When Jericho Sims is fully engaged and on, the Longhorns can be more than a handful against really good teams.

When Jericho Sims isn't fully engaged and on, the Longhorns likely won't be more than a handful against really good teams.

For the season, he's averaging 8.5 points and 6.8 rebounds per game, but he's capable of being a double-double type of guy.

No. 5 - One Texas volleyball thought from the weekend ...

After handling Kansas in four sets at home over the weekend, the Longhorns have only one remaining Big 12 match left in the regular-season before the Texas heads into post-season play.

Considering the Longhorns will likely share the regular-season Big 12 crown with Baylor, it feels like these two could have one more match-up left between them this season.

If it happens, it will likely occur in the Final Four or in the national championship game.

tenor.gif


No. 6 - If I had a vote that mattered ...

1. LSU
2. Ohio State
3. Clemson
4. Georgia
5. Alabama
6. Utah
7. Oklahoma
8. Minnesota
9. Michigan
10. Oregon

No. 7 – BUY or SELL …
BUY-SELL.gif


(Sell) For one damn time, the University of Texas needs to flex some damn financial muscle and make the kind of dynamic, big-boy hire that guarantees success. That's not what the Tom Herman hire was. That's not what the Charlie Strong hire was. Those were the best hires available because Texas subscribed to the theory of not being the force that lifts coaching salaries in the sport to the kind of levels that cause academic people to cry out in vain. I don't think Texas will ever be the force I think it should be, but it's what I believe it should aim to be.


(Sell) If the Longhorns moved on from Herman right now, it would mean that Texas will have set more than $30 million on fire in dead coaching money in a shade over 1,000 days. That's just not going to happen, not unless the people who are responsible for these types of decisions completely change their moral codes.


(Sell) I think he's coaching next year somewhere else. Besides, I believe if the Texas admin flinched over "red flag" concerns with Herman, it would fall over itself when vetting Meyer.


(Buy) In a heartbeat.


(Buy) I believe they'll reach out, but LSU will match any offer he receives, which probably makes landing him a pipe-dream.


(Buy) The powers at be will give Herman whatever he needs in terms of money for his coaching staff and in support staff, which nets them at least an 8. Scoring higher than a 9 or 10 would likely mean doing things without a moral compass and that's not UT.


(Sell) There's not a single reason to give the school the benefit of the doubt on this topic.


(Buy) Did the lack of a response from his head-butting Malcolm Roach at midfield yesterday before the game not give that away? Humpty Dumpty needs to be put back together again.


(Sell) Inside Bellmont, they are praying Herman saves them from the extension gaffe it made in the spring.


(Sell) Texas won't lose that many 2020 commitments in my opinion, but the program averages double-digit numbers of attrition every year, so you might want to double your transfer numbers.


(Buy) Yup.


(Sell) The answer to that question is Charlie Strong.


(Sell) I've been watching Texas football closely for more than three decades, went to the University as a student and don't plan on leaving the Austin area anytime soon. My habits ain't changing.


(Sell) Did you just out Sally Brown's handle?;)


(Buy) It's not rocket surgery.


(Buy) His history suggests he'll bunker down with guys he knows and has relationships with. My money is on Larry Fedora being the offensive coordinator next season and under normal circumstances, that would represent one hell of a hire. I just wonder if this program doesn't need someone that's not already here with fingerprints on this year's failure.

No. 8 – Eternal Randomness of the Spotty Sports Mind …

... Oklahoma is just begging to be dethroned as Big 12 champions and I don't think anyone has the spine to pull it off. The Sooners are going to win a fifth straight by default.

... Mike Gundy has very quietly had a very good year.

... Ed Orgeron said this about beating Arkansas on Saturday: "There wasn't going to be a celebration for beating Arkansas, they haven't beaten anyone in a long time." Yikes.

... Call me crazy, but I think Michigan gives Ohio State one hell of a game this weekend.

... Kevin Sumlin is exactly who we thought he was.

... Surprise! The 6-5 Dallas Cowboys struggled to make the key play in any phase of the game against a team the quality of the Patriots. Nothing but fool's gold in silver and blue.

... Frank Gore is officially No. 3 on the NFL's all-time rushing list. That's a real thing.

... Speaking of things that actually happened...


... Luka Doncic has my vote for early season NBA MVP. And he's still just a baby.

... Before they both retire, Patrick Beverly and Russell Westbrook have to be allowed to fight each other in an NBA game without punishment from the commish.

... It wasn't pretty, but it still counts. Liverpool 2 Crystal Palace 1. YNWA.

No. 9 - Two Quick Movie Reviews...

Ford Vs. Ferrari (B)

I've seen this movie called the Dad Movie of the Year and that's probably fair. More than the star-studded acting, which sometimes had me asking questions about the casting of the movie, the thing that stands out from the pack in this movie are all of the bad-ass cars. I'm not even a big car guy and I found myself salivating over some of the greatest cars ever made. That the story stays mostly very true to the facts made me very happy. It was just a well-executed story. Definitely worth the trip.

It's a Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (A)

It's easily one of my favorite movies of the year, as I walked out of the theater wanting to be more like Fred Rogers in every aspect of my life, while also wanting to watch as many of the greatest hits of Mister Rogers on Youtube as I could find. Tom Hanks absolutely nails his role of our childhood hero and the story was incredibly moving. I can see this being a movie that I watch on cable a lot once it makes it there.

No. 10 – And Finally ...


I'm not sure anything touched my heart this week more than this video. Get your tissues ready.

Wow Ketch paraphrased is if you are a fan of Texas football...find something else. 0-12 is a possibility and no one cares enough to do anything about it. Well definitely not sunshine pumping
 
My point is there are no choir boys in college football, and there’s not a whole lotta separation between Urban and Mack. Hell, they’re close friends.

The Urban is trash narrative exists in a vacuum.
Urban literally was suspended from his last job for being dirty.

That never happened to Mack.

Mack never had a paper trail of intent to constitute a conspiracy to commit to a fireable offense. Urban has left his last two jobs in shame in a way that's different than going 5-7.

I think it's intellectually dishonest to compare Mack and Urban to each other as if they are remotely the same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHop6714
Ketch, I agree with your premise about development. I have a question or two. If high 4 star to mid 3 stars can be developed into a great college player by a great staff then why do we have so much emphasis on class rankings? Wouldn't a great coach get players to end up with higher rankings based on his evaluation?
You are using the NFL as a guide to who became a better player through development. What about the vast majority of college rockstars that never get drafted or get cut in camp? Great article BTW
I have been trying to convey for years that the mid and low four star recruits aren't worth nearly as much in value as generally get placed on them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JHop6714
I don't understand why you say that Texas will never be the force you think it should be. It has been, at the highest level, in the not distant past. Mack was playing for two and winning one NC, Augie won multiple NCs and Rick had us in the Sweet 16 with some regularity. We will get back there. CDC is a good bet to make it happen.
You're probably correct. Never say never.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT