ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From the Weekend (Don't fall for the spring football okey-doke ...)

Don't lose the forest through the trees. It's not important in the bigger piece of discussion that the point was making.
I thought it was a weakness in your argument. I struggle to see your overall point. Can't we often find pluses in a minus coach? My opinion is Shaka should get fired; reality is he won't so I'm not sure what it matters. Seems like 18-19 is do or die (I think.)
 
I thought it was a weakness in your argument. I struggle to see your overall point. Can't we often find pluses in a minus coach? My opinion is Shaka should get fired; reality is he won't so I'm not sure what it matters. Seems like 18-19 is do or die (I think.)
The point is that when it came to actually leading, directing and improving the team, I thought he did that this year.

Coleman got better.
Roach got better
Bamaba got better.
Sims got better.
Young got better.

I'd even argue that Eric Davis got better.

If you would have told me before the season started that Jones would cancer, Davis would get suspended and Bamba would get hurt in a critical stretch, I would not have predicted that this team would make the Tournament. That it did is proof of some good coaching.

That being said, it doesn;t change the bottom line of the results from Shaka's first three seasons. It just adds some context.
 
The point is that when it came to actually leading, directing and improving the team, I thought he did that this year.

Coleman got better.
Roach got better
Bamaba got better.
Sims got better.
Young got better.

I'd even argue that Eric Davis got better.

If you would have told me before the season started that Jones would cancer, Davis would get suspended and Bamba would get hurt in a critical stretch, I would not have predicted that this team would make the Tournament. That it did is proof of some good coaching.

That being said, it doesn;t change the bottom line of the results from Shaka's first three seasons. It just adds some context.
fair enough
 
fair enough
the-walking-dead-season-5-finale-rocky-4.gif
 
@Ketchum The big buy/sell Q that arises from your column...

Ketch: . "[Shaka] has to do better or his tenure will end as a failure."
Buy/Sell*: Will that tenure end after next year by the decision of CDC if Shaka does not win 20+ games and finish in the top 3 in the conference, or make the Sweet 16?

*I recognized I have not formed the Buy/Sell Q in the proper form.
 
So if Shaka wins 20+ games and at least one NCAA tourney game next season is that “better” enough? Do you think he will?
I actually like that bar as a realistic goal. Getting to the Sweet 16 ain't easy.

But for me, I want to see Shaka COACH some. And I'm not talking about being a calming influence, or picking the right time to let the players lead the timeout huddle. I want to see him say, "Hey we aren't a good 3 pt shooting team but that Sims kid seems to shoot 70% when we get him the ball. So maybe let's stop using our center solely as a guy who screens for the guards at the top of the key."

Shaka says all the right things, I love everything about him but it's like he can't gameday coach his way out of a wet paper bag.

If you get a 14 pt lead on Nevada, and their tallest guy is 6'7 why aren't you POUNDING the ball inside? THAT'S the frustration that makes me question Shaka's ability as a D1 coach.
 
What do you think happens to this team is Jones doesn't have cancer and Davis isn't ineligible?

Davis is a non issue. Young is the same or better player, shoots about the same and better energy Davis only missed 8 games all year, his absence meant little. If anything, we may well have lost the OSU and WVa games if Davis plays and Young took his normal bench role. And Tech would have blown us off the court.

Clearly Jones is just the opposite. With him this was a borderline top 10 team. Two first round NBA talents and a decent supporting cast.

But your question really misses the main point about Shaka. Which is, Shakas offense is every bit as bad as anything Herman had last year. It has not only has no identity, it has little purpose. Half court play is basically slow perimeter passes and then a random drive to the basket and hope for the best with little time on the clock. With three big guys like we had, that's criminal. DO, if nothing else, should have been passing hi lo to Bamba and Sims over the top of any defense. It rarely happened, maybe never. Sims and Bamba are made to jump and dunk, and we couldn't do that with short teams, like Nevada. Its just mind bottling.

Sure AJ opens up the floor with his shooting. But the floor was open for those elite bigs without him, and we didn't take advantage. And Andrew opening up the floor doesn't matte much when no one cuts to the basket. I have rarely seen an offense that's so stagnant. It makes Rick Barnes offense look like Phil Jacksons. This isn't a matter of "plays" or "playbook". Its a matter of ball movement and player movement. Movement is the antithesis of a Shaka offense.

So even with AJ, and the several wins he would have brought us with his presence, this team would have disappointed. A failed offense is a failed offense no matter how talented the players are that are operating it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: txfight
Okay. Remove realistic from my original question. Who should TX have pursued demonstrating "We're Texas"?
Now that's a good and fun question.

I was quite open that I would have made a full-court press on John Harbaugh at a time when he wasn't sitting on an extension. No way the Ravens would have matched a monster contract offer.

It's crazy to think about now in the current landscape, but Jimbo would have been a monster hire and he would have listened.

I would make David Shaw tell me no. I feel like if you could get that dude in Austin for a visit to check out the place, you might have a chance.

The timing for Dabo was off and the window for Saban was closed.

I think the best thing that ever happened for Tom was that little 24-hour freak out over "red flags" that took place. Once that occurred and everyone looked around and realized there weren't any harvested back-up plans, something like a concern that Herman was too young and liked to have too good of a time in public became trivial real fast.

People forget how that all went down, but other media outlets in this market were reporting that UT higher-ups had completely ruled Herman out and I was the only one in the market explaining in as careful of a tone as I could what the hell was going on. Yet, we never reported that Herman was no longer under consideration. If ever anything was worthy of an "85-percent" or "It's Austin" level of remembering, it was that moment.

If that had happened over here, the uproar would have been over the top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buffalosoldiers
What do you think happens to this team is Jones doesn't have cancer and Davis isn't ineligible?
Probably a higher seed but still a first or second round exit.

The offensive scheme is so bad that the team relies on exceptional talent to overcome it. When that exceptional talent is removed or has an off-night, the result is ugly.
 
Davis is a non issue. Young is the same or better player, shoots about the same and better energy Davis only missed 8 games all year, his absence meant little. If anything, we may well have lost the OSU and WVa games if Davis plays and Young took his normal bench role. And Tech would have blown us off the court.

Clearly Jones is just the opposite. With him this was a borderline top 10 team. Two first round NBA talents and a decent supporting cast.

But your question really misses the main point about Shaka. Which is, Shakas offense is every bit as bad as anything Herman had last year. It has not only has no identity, it has little purpose. Half court play is basically slow perimeter passes and then a random drive to the basket and hope for the best with little time on the clock. With three big guys like we had, that's criminal. DO, if nothing else, should have been passing hi lo to Bamba and Sims over the top of any defense. It rarely happened, maybe never. Sims and Bamba are made to jump and dunk, and we couldn't do that with short teams, like Nevada. Its just mind bottling.

Sure AJ opens up the floor with his shooting. But the floor was open for those elite bigs without him, and we didn't take advantage. And Andrew opening up the floor doesn't matte much when no one cuts to the basket. I have rarely seen an offense that's so stagnant. It makes Rick Barnes offense look like Phil Jacksons. This isn't a matter of "plays" or "playbook". Its a matter of ball movement and player movement. Movement is the antithesis of a Shaka offense.

So even with AJ, and the several wins he would have brought us with his presence, this team would have disappointed. A failed offense is a failed offense no matter how talented the players are that are operating it.
I think this team was capable of 23+ wins and a Sweet 16 spot with a healthy roster.

This is a team that was forced to start Febres and Young, both of whom were overwhelmed in the moment, against a very good Nevada team... that they still should have beaten.
 
Probably a higher seed but still a first or second round exit.

The offensive scheme is so bad that the team relies on exceptional talent to overcome it. When that exceptional talent is removed or has an off-night, the result is ugly.
That last part is true of any team. See Virginia this weekend.

Texas actually had some very nice offensive showings this season when it had all of its parts and before a umber of guys had really started to show improvement.
 
Other Osetkowski, who underperformed? Because I saw a lot of guys making progress throughout the season,all the way until the final game of the season.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/stats/_/id/251

Take a look at those season stats, and tell me who you think did as well or better than you expected.

I think Coleman improved over the year. Sims as well, but only because Bamba got hurt did he really get the opportunity. Roach bounced back from a soph slump.

Those stats make my eyes bleed.
 
I think this team was capable of 23+ wins and a Sweet 16 spot with a healthy roster.

This is a team that was forced to start Febres and Young, both of whom were overwhelmed in the moment, against a very good Nevada team... that they still should have beaten.

I don't disagree with any of that. None of which relates to the point I made however. A team with a lottery pick center and a first round guard, and the rest of the roster being top 100 recruits should be a final four contender. But it wont be with a Shaka offense.
 

The following statements are almost certainly going to be heard in the coming weeks with the start of spring football on Tuesday:

"The defense is ahead of the offense."

"Both quarterbacks have good days, but remain inconsistent."

"Collin Johnson looks like a future NFL player."

"The off-season has been incredible."

The question I've been asking myself for the last few weeks is whether there's actually anything we can learn about this football team's fortunes in six months based on anything we see, hear or think in the next month?

I have my doubts.

There's only so much that can be fixed on a 7-6 team in a couple of months, especially on the side of the ball where so much attention will be focused. Herb Hand hasn't even had a practice with his new players, Calvin Anderson won't arrive until the summer and a number of players are still on the mend. The trickle down impact of the unsettled line issues the team will deal with this spring hits every position, from quarterbacks to running backs to wide receivers to tight ends.

Much discussion will take place about the quarterback job, but it would be shocking to see Tom Herman announce a starter before the end of the spring, and if we're being honest, is this really a job that can be won in p-r-a-c-t-i-c-e?

From my perspective, the 15 days of practice this team is about to experience are all about making baby steps of forward progress. Forget about the offensive line as a whole ... are there a couple guys picking up their levels of play? Forget about whether this team has a 1,200-yard back on the roster ... are the young guys making definitive progress? Position by position, baby steps of progress needs to be the name of the day.

With the anticipation that Rome will take at least 6-9 more months (at a minimum) to build on the offensive side of the ball, it should allow everyone to properly control the amount of Kool-Aid they consume in the coming weeks and months. If you hear something about a player or a part of the team that sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

I'm not suggesting that everyone tempter their enthusiasm as much as I'm advocating establishing realistic expectations.

What's a realistic expectation for this team over 15 days of practice?

Progress. In small increments. At every position on the roster.

No. 2 – The elephant in the room ...
EmjzjdP.jpg


Quarterbacks, quarterbacks and more quarterbacks.

Will Shane be released without restriction from the first day on? Who takes reps with the 1s? Are the reps really even, regardless of coaching rhetoric?

What about the freshmen? Can one of them take reps with the second-team offense at the expense of the other quarterbacks before the end of the spring?

We could ask questions about this group until the cows come home, but I'm going to stick to one more and one more only ... is it more productive or problematic to have a starting quarterback named before the team breaks for the summer?

I'm going to make a case that, despite the possible negatives, it is more important to have the quarterback of this team announced for everyone to see and I'm going to point to last season's summer workouts as the big centerpiece of my point.

Championship teams take a break after finals and all the way through Memorial Day, but from June 1 on, it's work time and the only break between June 1 and Big 12 media days (good teams take their starting quarterbacks to these events ...) is the Fourth of July. Other than that, it's daily workouts and three or four nights of seven-on-seven for the entire summer.

Last year, the players in the program participated in fewer seven-on-seven workouts than just about any team I can ever remember covering in the last two decades. Part of that is the lack of quarterback leadership the program had a year ago. It's the quarterbacks who get the keys to the practice field. It's the quarterbacks who organize the entire workout schedule. It's the quarterbacks who hold everyone accountable for getting their ass to practice.

Chris Simms made people show up because of his personality. Vince Young made people show up with his mere presence. Colt McCoy made sure people showed up by driving around and picking up his teammates, personally.

This team will not win 9+ games this season if it coasts through June and only busts its ass in seven-on-seven workouts for three weeks in July because the internal leadership inside the program is lacking and/or being placed on training wheels.

Look, if there's really not an answer at the quarterback position by the spring game, then you hold off. However, if one guy is clearly ahead of the other, to the point that he is taking the overwhelming volume of reps with the first-team offense, then I would contend that there's just as much good out there to be had than bad when making an announcement.

It's time for someone to spread some wings at that position, if at all possible.

Otherwise, someone needs to tell someone on the defense to take the lead in off-season organizing because the players expect the quarterbacks to take the lead ... and when that doesn't happen, the least-active summer workout schedule in the last 20 years occurs.

No. 3 - Really wondering what is inside the tanks of these players ...

Toneil Carter - Right when the door seemed to be opening for the true freshman in 2017, he was passed on the depth chart by another true freshman. For the first time in Carter's life, he didn't just out-talent everyone on the way to the top of the depth chart. How Carter responds this spring will likely tell us what we should expect from him for the next few seasons.

Reese Leitao - A redshirt year always made sense for a guy with a ton of talent, but not nearly the overall development needed to take advantage of playing time available in the fall. Well, the playing time is still there, as is the talent. Where will the development be?

Denzel Okafor - With Calvin Anderson on the way, there's a game of musical chairs taking place on the offensive line and someone that starts in the spring is going to be on the bench in the fall. Okafor is always a guy that has been talked about in the context of future upside, but as he enters his third season, it's time for the upside to be realized. This guy HAS to emerge as a top-four lineman on this team over the next 15 days or he'll have officially not made the progress needed that matches what his ceiling can/should be.

Chris Nelson - He's a starter on this defensive line and a key piece of the puzzle going into this season, but where is his head?

Jeffrey McCulloch - You wouldn't have convinced me in a 100 years that McCulloch would be entering his third year without having locked up a starting position, but yet here we are ... and he's still not a starter. It's time for him to take a job and run with it.

Brandon Jones - It's year three ... this should be the time he starts to take off. This is a guy who has played a lot of football, but now it's time to emerge into a game-changer or give up the job to someone who will (see Caden Sterns).

No. 4 - Well, here we are ...

I believe the following statements are all true ...

a. Shaka Smart did a really nice job of coaching in his first and third seasons in Austin, although really nice only means he had teams good enough to qualify for the NCAA Tournament and not win.

b. However good those first and third seasons were, they don't cancel out the bad from the second season, one that was arguably the worst in the modern history of the program.

c. Smart hasn't competed for a conference title or made it to a Sweet 16 in his first three years, which is beneath the bar of acceptability that I think Smart, himself, would create. His three years have been a failure to date.

d. I believe Smart is still held in very high regard across the country, even if his Q rating isn't high among a large segment of Texas fans.

e. He has to do better or his tenure will end as a failure.

That's pretty much it.

No. 5 - Question about the Texas women ...

How far do the Texas women have to go in the Tournament in order to call this season a success, especially following three losses to Baylor in Big 12 play, which defined the regular season?

I'm going to say Elite 8. The Longhorns are a two-seed and get the first two games of the Tournament at home. A regional final against UCLA in Kansas City could be a very big game for this program.

In the meantime, I expect that the Longhorns handle some business on Monday night in an effort to set up that very important game.

No. 6 – Random Tournament thoughts ...

... I thought the edge in experience that Nevada had across its line-up proved to be a pretty defining difference between the two teams in the final two minutes. Unless you're Kentucky or Duke, it's going to be hard to have success with three freshmen in the starting line-up vs. a bunch of upperclassmen. Nevada played with just a touch more composure.

... You can scoff all you want, but this team had a chance to be playing in the Sweet 16 with a healthy Andrew Jones and eligible Eric Davis.

... I'm a fan of Dylan Osetkowski, but he needs to commit himself to a level of fitness that he simply wasn't committed to this season. I wouldn't normally make a comment like that, but on a team with a rotation of seven at the end of the season, it made a negative difference.

... Matt Coleman and Snoop Roach will be better next March for the experience of this March. Those two dudes deserved a second game.

... For the most part, I thought the officials did a good job of letting the players play (not a lot of whistles), which makes it ironic that a big piece of the outcome was the final two fouls called on Mo Bamba, which were questionable at best. I would have like to have seen him in those final five minutes.

... So, about Virginia being my national championship pick ... oops.

... Texas A&M looked like the most dangerous team in the Tournament on the first weekend.

... Random note: Five of the eight teams that qualified for the Sweet 16 were on the Texas schedule this year. Three more teams (not including West Virginia that were on the Texas schedule qualified on Sunday.

... The door is wide-open for Kentucky.

... It's hard not to root for Loyola (Chicago). I've been a fan ever since Brewster's Millions.

No. 7 - No offense to the Kansas baseball team ...

The Jayhawks should never win a baseball game in Austin. Ever.

If the Texas baseball program is living right, these are the games that the program can win in cruise control. When it loses them, it's a warning sign.

The 2018 Jayhawks actually have a nice little squad, but it doesn't change anything ... a good Texas team handles its business and wins all three games.

That happened this weekend.

Say whatever you want about this Texas team and where it might be headed in year two under a new coach, but taking all three games this weekend under different circumstances proves to be a nice pulse check of this club going into conference play after the number that Stanford and Arkansas combined to do to it in the last week.

Like Tom Herman's program, David Pierce's is still going through building block stages and it's possible this weekend served as one.

We'll see.

No. 8 – Buy or Sell …
buy-or-sell-stock-ideas-by-experts-for-december-20-2017.jpg


BUY or SELL: Texas goes undefeated in non-conference next year, setting itself up for the type of season we're all dying for around here?

(Sell) I'm just not in the giving benefits of the doubt to this program until they are earned. I fell for the okey-doke last year for the first time since 2010 and it won't happen again the very next year.

BUY or SELL: As a general philosophy, Texas should not hire head coaches from schools like Tulane, VCU and Houston?


(Buy) Texas should never have to reach down, not if Texas is being Texas.

BUY or SELL: Fans didn't know how good they had it during the days of Mack, Augie and Barnes?

(Buy) In 20 years, the era will be remembered as the Golden Years.

BUY or SELL: Shaka is coaching elsewhere next season?

(Sell) I don't see it. I think he knows he'd be remembered as a huge failure if he left now.

BUY or SELL: Texas baseball is only 50-50 to make an NCAA regional this year?

(Sell) I'd say 70-30. They kind of remind me of the basketball team in that they are going to get some benefit of the doubt because of the schedule.

BUY or SELL: Liverpool advances to the Champions League semifinals.

(Buy) I ain't scared.

BUY or SELL: You would let @UTwiz back after an extended break if he formally apologized, but his ego is too big to ever do so?

(Buy) All I ever asked for was some basic levels of respect. I tend to feel like he views showing people respect as a sign of weakness.

BUY or SELL: Ketch throws a damn good kids birthday party?

(Buy) 25+ kids got a 2-hour free-for-all good time at Catch Air, complete with pizza, toy bags and 2 cakes from which to choose.

BUY or SELL: You like Peter, Paul and Mary better than Simon and Garfunkel or the Beatles.

(Sell) Girl, you crazy.

No. 9 – Eternal Randomness of the Spotty Sports Mind …

... I watched golf on Sunday over the NCAA Tournament and soccer. That's the power of Tiger Woods.

... So, the Jets moved up in the draft so they could draft a quarterback? Oh boy ...

... Really like Houston's signing of Tyrann Mathieu. When he's healthy, he's an impact player.

... Man, this just might not be the Warriors' year. It feels like it's there for the Rockets to take. Watching James Harden in the playoffs will be fascinating.

... Mo Salah, Mo Salah,

Running down the wing.

Salah la la la la la la la

Egyptian king

... Ronaldo has 20 goals in his last 11 games. Yeah, I'd say he's in form with the quarterfinals of the Champion's League approaching.

No. 10 – And Finally …
augie-garrido-1600x500.jpg


Augie Garrido, the man, was an absolute joy to cover.

The very first time I met Augie Garrido was in the hotel lobby in a Dallas hotel near the airport on the day he was announced as the Texas head coach. Tipped by Jerry Scarborough on his whereabouts, Andy Liscano, myself and a camera guy sat in the hotel lobby for three hours waiting for Garrido to emerge from the hotel elevators.

When he finally popped into the lobby while wearing a hotel robe, we sprang into action and confirmed through him that he was going to be the next Texas coach. If he didn't know what he was getting into by taking the job before that moment, he sure as hell did afterwards.

I had a chance to talk to Augie after big wins, big losses and even while he was wearing slippers, and he was nothing short of a bright, shining soul each and every time.

We were all incredibly lucky to have him around here for all those years. He was a special one.

Rest in peace, Coach.
 
Now that's a good and fun question.

I was quite open that I would have made a full-court press on John Harbaugh at a time when he wasn't sitting on an extension. No way the Ravens would have matched a monster contract offer.

It's crazy to think about now in the current landscape, but Jimbo would have been a monster hire and he would have listened.

I would make David Shaw tell me no. I feel like if you could get that dude in Austin for a visit to check out the place, you might have a chance.

The timing for Dabo was off and the window for Saban was closed.

I think the best thing that ever happened for Tom was that little 24-hour freak out over "red flags" that took place. Once that occurred and everyone looked around and realized there weren't any harvested back-up plans, something like a concern that Herman was too young and liked to have too good of a time in public became trivial real fast.

People forget how that all went down, but other media outlets in this market were reporting that UT higher-ups had completely ruled Herman out and I was the only one in the market explaining in as careful of a tone as I could what the hell was going on. Yet, we never reported that Herman was no longer under consideration. If ever anything was worthy of an "85-percent" or "It's Austin" level of remembering, it was that moment.

If that had happened over here, the uproar would have been over the top.

when we hired pierce, it seemed like we were trying to throw our weight around but couldn't and baseball our clout is for real. not sure if that was who was doing the scheming or circumstances (Vandy stuff) or what, but that party hadn't changed, so i don't see any reason to expect the result to be different.

seems like football would be a harder sell and we very likely would have ended up with a much, more questionable fit than than herman. for all the negatives about his experience, fit has meant a ton at this school and Herman's rep was that of a superstar rising and an absolutely perfect fit for Texas. the time may have been too soon, but he would have been at LSU if they didn't move quickly. And then what happens? At best, we get harbaugh who hasn't coached in college in almost 20 years. I love the dude too, but let's not act like he's proven match for a college head coaching job, much less one where "fit" is as important as Texas.

So, what's your take Ketch? Bad hire, "good hire but could have been better" or best possible hire at the time. Count me as best possible hire at the time. we're having some growing pains, but i'm sitting here and i still fully believe in where we are headed.
 
Buy or sell next week @Ketchum. Salah departs for Real Madrid after this season and Bale returns to England. Just not to Liverpool.
 
Let's set up a call with your old man. I'll tell you the "other candidate" story over the phone. I can't tell it on the board.

Why not? It's not cool to hint about something you are not willing to dish.
 
when we hired pierce, it seemed like we were trying to throw our weight around but couldn't and baseball our clout is for real. not sure if that was who was doing the scheming or circumstances (Vandy stuff) or what, but that party hadn't changed, so i don't see any reason to expect the result to be different.

seems like football would be a harder sell and we very likely would have ended up with a much, more questionable fit than than herman. for all the negatives about his experience, fit has meant a ton at this school and Herman's rep was that of a superstar rising and an absolutely perfect fit for Texas. the time may have been too soon, but he would have been at LSU if they didn't move quickly. And then what happens? At best, we get harbaugh who hasn't coached in college in almost 20 years. I love the dude too, but let's not act like he's proven match for a college head coaching job, much less one where "fit" is as important as Texas.

So, what's your take Ketch? Bad hire, "good hire but could have been better" or best possible hire at the time. Count me as best possible hire at the time. we're having some growing pains, but i'm sitting here and i still fully believe in where we are headed.
Texas misplayed its hand by misunderstanding the clock in play for the primary elite candidates.

It should have taken its sweet time.
 
I don't disagree with any of that. None of which relates to the point I made however. A team with a lottery pick center and a first round guard, and the rest of the roster being top 100 recruits should be a final four contender. But it wont be with a Shaka offense.
it matters that those players are freshmen.

Ask any number of teams that lost this week with lottery picks on their teams, from Arizona to Texas to Michigan State to numerous other schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hook_em27
No. 5 - Question about the Texas women ...

How far do the Texas women have to go in the Tournament in order to call this season a success, especially following three losses to Baylor in Big 12 play, which defined the regular season?

I'm going to say Elite 8. The Longhorns are a two-seed and get the first two games of the Tournament at home. A regional final against UCLA in Kansas City could be a very big game for this program.

..........................................................................................................

BUY or SELL: Fans didn't know how good they had it during the days of Mack, Augie and Barnes?

(Buy) In 20 years, the era will be remembered as the Golden Years.

Karen Aston has taken her teams to three straight Sweet 16s, hopefully #4 tonight. Her first 5 years are everything Barnes' were, including his best run from 2001-4. Considering Barnes never replicated that early success, though he still had a lot of damn good years, I think you might want to ease up on how you continue to frame Astons success at UT.

As a Longhorn fan, I can assure you that I think Aston is one of the few coaches who has more than held up her end of the bargain in every way one can measure.



If you think Smart earned a "B" this year, and is a damn good coach, etc etc....... you need to reconsider the scale on which you grade Aston.
 
it matters that those players are freshmen.

Ask any number of teams that lost this week with lottery picks on their teams, from Arizona to Texas to Michigan State to numerous other schools.

Roach and DO aren't freshman. They are juniors. They basically played the entire Nevada game and most all the minutes possible this season. Jones spot was mostly filled by Davis, also a junior. The bench was filled with freshmen, and a sophomore who rarely saw the floor.
 
I'm with Ketch on the focus on incremental progress. Before Anderson shows up, we still have a basic talent problem with the offensive line - I won't name the names but no coach can turn two of these guys into solid starters IMO - and as Alex has noticed, Kerstatter needs to show he is mobile enough to hold off speed rushers or move inside. Ehlinger needs to improve a lot and Anderson and Johnson needs to play like NFL draft picks next year to win more than 8 in the regular season. Don't listen to any happy talk before then.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT