Whaaaat?I’m only 39, but I’d take Reba over Dua Lipa. Dua is a 10/10 smoke show, but Reba moves me in ways that few other women have.
Whaaaat?I’m only 39, but I’d take Reba over Dua Lipa. Dua is a 10/10 smoke show, but Reba moves me in ways that few other women have.
I don't think that's a crazy take.Arch may win us a Natty this year if given the chance. He’s got quick feet to improvise and a better deep touch. He still has things to learn but he can make things happen when it gets off schedule. We may never have this combo again - great D, great O line and great WRs. It is soooo rare. I fear that’ll we’ll come up short with Q. We could do it with Q but it feels a bit more likely with Arch.
I'm a huge Colt fan but if Q wins a natty he jumps Colt. Sorry bro.If he’s pretty good and Texas wins a natty that doesn’t necessarily put him over Colt. He needs a special type of season for that
Dua might be "Sunshine" from Harlem Nights.
Im outShe's the face of Dolce and Gabbana. She's never looked better in her life.
Easy brother. Don't get out over your skis. There is more to playing QB than throwing bombs and running fast. If you don't think Arch will have a learning curve you are sadly mistaken. Let's consider the competition he has played before you bring out the annoiting oil.I'm not even sure about that, it just seems like the offense has the entire playbook available with Arch. While an efficient subset with Quinn.
Not a crazy take but there are so many other aspects that you don't see on T. V. to playing QB that Q does that it will take Arch more time to master.. Q had a slightly off game. People need to relax.I don't think that's a crazy take.
Easy brother. Don't get out over your skis. There is more to playing QB than throwing bombs and running fast. If you don't think Arch will have a learning curve you are sadly mistaken. Let's consider the competition he has played before you bring out the annoiting oil.
Ewers processes the field way better , arch will eventually be better with experience
Arch may win us a Natty this year if given the chance. He’s got quick feet to improvise and a better deep touch. He still has things to learn but he can make things happen when it gets off schedule. We may never have this combo again - great D, great O line and great WRs. It is soooo rare. I fear that’ll we’ll come up short with Q. We could do it with Q but it feels a bit more likely with Arch.
It is a crazy take. How does Arch compare to Quinn in RPOs? That is a staple of Sark's offense. If Sark is who we think he is then having a great Oline, Defense and QB should not be that rare.I don't think that's a crazy take.
The dynamics in the quarterback room are unique to any program in the country.It is a crazy take. How does Arch compare to Quinn in RPOs? That is a staple of Sark's offense. If Sark is who we think he is then having a great Oline, Defense and QB should not be that rare.
If it is that rare why would Sark waste this opportunity by playing the worse player?
Arch is not nearly as good at the RPO game as Quinn. It takes time to get those down he might be later, but not todayThe dynamics in the quarterback room are unique to any program in the country.
How do you think Arch compares to Quinn in RPOs?
Based on what?Arch is not nearly as good at the RPO game as Quinn.
It would be interesting to know how the coaches quantify the edges that each other bring to the equation.Based on watch the games. In the first game I do not think they actually ran any RPOs. Then in the second start most of his RPOs looked to be called from the sideline and not actual reads. Go back and watch. Again this not surprising since he has two starts. It took Quinn time to master them as well.
This has literally become something that people just say.as a default statement.
The "R" is not for the QB to run. Would he be better in zone read, yes absolutely. But the RPO is about do I give this to the running back or do i throw to the WR. It takes quick processing and tons of reps. I think Arch will get there, but Quinn is great at that now.It would be interesting to know how the coaches quantify the edges that each other bring to the equation.
For instance, does the value that you just described weigh more in terms of importance that an actually being a legit RPO threat in the RPO game, which Arch clearly gives the offense when he's in the game.
Arch actually leads all rushers in YPC for those that have more than 2 carries and that includes sack numbers.
Right...The "R" is not for the QB to run. Would he be better in zone read, yes absolutely. But the RPO is about do I give this to the running back or do i throw to the WR. It takes quick processing and tons of reps. I think Arch will get there, but Quinn is great at that now.
S. Carolina wins that game on the back of their defense. S. Carolina D is pretty salty and will live in the aggy backfield.The truism is that QB play makes a difference. LaNorris Sellers, as a redshirt freshman, needs to be on top of his game against a very good TAMU defense. I hope he and the rest of the team have the recipe to have something excellent cooking.
I tend to agree.S. Carolina wins that game on the back of their defense. S. Carolina D is pretty salty and will live in the aggy backfield.
💯The fact we are even having this debate is delicious. Finally being out of the “QB Desert” is allsome.
We're on the same page.Wingo needs to play more, period. Every play he’s not on the field, you’re losing the potential of a home run.
what good did it do to process a throw to an open deep pass player that you can't consistently hit?It’s not a default statement , Ewers can hit intermediate and short throws a lot better.
What makes you think arch could process the game as fast or better than Quinn? He has only faced weak defenses
... Clemson is going to win the ACC.