I will.Cool stats, thanks for compiling! You should tweet the chart (if you haven't already)
I will.Cool stats, thanks for compiling! You should tweet the chart (if you haven't already)
It was just so heart-warming to see that end well.Items like your last make me wonder how people can deny the emotional intelligence and sentience of some animals.
It happens from time to time.
Yes, there is a direct correlation between the super blues being drafted much higher than non-super blues.Ketch - I like and appreciate the analytical work you are doing. If I’m following you correctly, it is very binary, drafted or not drafted. If you dug deeper, would it warrant thinking about getting drafted in rounds 1 -3 differently than 4-7? Or even a different value for each round. It seems like that would yield a different conclusion than the 85th ranked recruit is essentially the same as number 248.
Doesn’t this mean saying there is little difference between the 85th ranked recruit and 248th, potentially misleading? There is little difference in getting drafted, but could be a meaningful difference in playing in the NFL vs. getting drafted but not playing.Yes, there is a direct correlation between the super blues being drafted much higher than non-super blues.
I wasn't talking about those two rankings. (see the rounds those players that hit were drafted in).Doesn’t this mean saying there is little difference between the 85th ranked recruit and 248th, potentially misleading? There is little difference in getting drafted, but could be a meaningful difference in playing in the NFL vs. getting drafted but not playing.
To clarify, I’m mainly referring to the overall similarity between the Blue Chip Ratio Teams and the post-transfer column. Your graphic would seem to indicate that USC and FSU should outperform their blue chip ratio position. Michigan and Auburn should do worse. That would prove your point.Indeed. I just think they tell different, important stories.
Your graphic would seem to indicate that USC and FSU should outperform their blue chip ratio position.
Appreciate it! Birthday cake!Great stuff Ketch. I love you deep dive into the recruiting rankings, it has peeked my interest since you began on this crusade and really reshaped my own view of recruiting. Appreciate your exhaustive search for the truth. Have a great rest of your Sunday, and enjoy your rogue shop
I tried to find the difference between your metrics and the blue chip ratio. USC and FSU are in your top team metrics but are not on the blue chip ratio. Michigan and Auburn are top blue chip ratio teams but not on the super blue chip metrics. IMHO, if USC and FSU outperform Michigan and Auburn this season that would be evidence that favors your metrics in this small sample size. Other than that, I noticed a lot of the same teams.Why?
Tom BeanFor those not aware, what is the high school that Tyrone Swoops is now coaching ?
I don't think there's enough difference makers on those teams to warrant being in a top tier or tier that matters.I tried to find the difference between your metrics and the blue chip ratio. USC and FSU are in your top team metrics but are not on the blue chip ratio. Michigan and Auburn are top blue chip ratio teams but not on the super blue chip metrics. IMHO, if USC and FSU outperform Michigan and Auburn this season that would be evidence that favors your metrics in this small sample size. Other than that, I noticed a lot of the same teams.
That was going to be my question. How many of A&M’s super blue chips are lower class men? Also, what is the position distribution? Are most of them along the d-line?11 of A&M's 19 have not played in a game yet because they just signed.
15 from the last two classes.That was going to be my question. How many of A&M’s super blue chips are lower class men? Also, what is the position distribution? Are most of them along the d-line?
I don't really have any desire to watch it twice.Man no love for Solo? Any movie with Emilia Clarke has to be top ten on that fact alone.
Back in the 70s, when I was in Dallas, I'd put a dollar in the farmer's mailbox as a fee to fish his pond in Howe, Texas. Wow. Things have changed.Tom Bean
No doubt. +1,000,000Rogue One might be no.1 on my list. It was so well written and carried out. Then the Vader scene at the end… chef’s kiss.
Back in the 70s, when I was in Dallas, I'd put a dollar in the farmer's mailbox as a fee to fish his pond in Howe, Texas. Wow. Things have changed.
Ooooh, good question.B/S QE has more 5 TD games this year than 1 TD games.
I feel like he gets two 5 TD performances. That’s 10 in 2 games, then avg 3 for the other 10 games. A run at the Big12 championship game, plus a bowl game, gives him a realistic shot at 45 for the year.Ooooh, good question.
Buy
5 before Sark is tempted by the Portal.How many WR do you think we'll take in the 2023 recruiting cycle?
The triggered list led the column lolSo the data tells me Jimbo sucks at development and the aggys are underachieving as usual. ACES