He's good people.I appreciate the kind words about Jordan Whittington. I have the pleasure of getting to know Jordan and he is all that and more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's good people.I appreciate the kind words about Jordan Whittington. I have the pleasure of getting to know Jordan and he is all that and more.
I'm sorry Ketch. I'm just going to have to disagree with you on including any of the sequels in your top ten. They were ill conceived trash. There is a reason people want them retconned. Top 3 were spot on though.
Indeed. I just think they tell different, important stories.Nice graphic. both results are still pretty close.
Thanks for the super recruit stats. Very interesting.
I like the Star Wars ranking too but I'd have Rogue One much lower.
??Thanks! So does the ranking “.. post attrition and including transfers” sort of amount to being the elite players on the 2022 rosters?
I will.Cool stats, thanks for compiling! You should tweet the chart (if you haven't already)
It was just so heart-warming to see that end well.Items like your last make me wonder how people can deny the emotional intelligence and sentience of some animals.
It happens from time to time.
Yes, there is a direct correlation between the super blues being drafted much higher than non-super blues.Ketch - I like and appreciate the analytical work you are doing. If I’m following you correctly, it is very binary, drafted or not drafted. If you dug deeper, would it warrant thinking about getting drafted in rounds 1 -3 differently than 4-7? Or even a different value for each round. It seems like that would yield a different conclusion than the 85th ranked recruit is essentially the same as number 248.
Doesn’t this mean saying there is little difference between the 85th ranked recruit and 248th, potentially misleading? There is little difference in getting drafted, but could be a meaningful difference in playing in the NFL vs. getting drafted but not playing.Yes, there is a direct correlation between the super blues being drafted much higher than non-super blues.
I wasn't talking about those two rankings. (see the rounds those players that hit were drafted in).Doesn’t this mean saying there is little difference between the 85th ranked recruit and 248th, potentially misleading? There is little difference in getting drafted, but could be a meaningful difference in playing in the NFL vs. getting drafted but not playing.
To clarify, I’m mainly referring to the overall similarity between the Blue Chip Ratio Teams and the post-transfer column. Your graphic would seem to indicate that USC and FSU should outperform their blue chip ratio position. Michigan and Auburn should do worse. That would prove your point.Indeed. I just think they tell different, important stories.
Your graphic would seem to indicate that USC and FSU should outperform their blue chip ratio position.
Appreciate it! Birthday cake!Great stuff Ketch. I love you deep dive into the recruiting rankings, it has peeked my interest since you began on this crusade and really reshaped my own view of recruiting. Appreciate your exhaustive search for the truth. Have a great rest of your Sunday, and enjoy your rogue shop
I tried to find the difference between your metrics and the blue chip ratio. USC and FSU are in your top team metrics but are not on the blue chip ratio. Michigan and Auburn are top blue chip ratio teams but not on the super blue chip metrics. IMHO, if USC and FSU outperform Michigan and Auburn this season that would be evidence that favors your metrics in this small sample size. Other than that, I noticed a lot of the same teams.Why?
Tom BeanFor those not aware, what is the high school that Tyrone Swoops is now coaching ?
I don't think there's enough difference makers on those teams to warrant being in a top tier or tier that matters.I tried to find the difference between your metrics and the blue chip ratio. USC and FSU are in your top team metrics but are not on the blue chip ratio. Michigan and Auburn are top blue chip ratio teams but not on the super blue chip metrics. IMHO, if USC and FSU outperform Michigan and Auburn this season that would be evidence that favors your metrics in this small sample size. Other than that, I noticed a lot of the same teams.
That was going to be my question. How many of A&M’s super blue chips are lower class men? Also, what is the position distribution? Are most of them along the d-line?11 of A&M's 19 have not played in a game yet because they just signed.
15 from the last two classes.That was going to be my question. How many of A&M’s super blue chips are lower class men? Also, what is the position distribution? Are most of them along the d-line?
I don't really have any desire to watch it twice.Man no love for Solo? Any movie with Emilia Clarke has to be top ten on that fact alone.
Back in the 70s, when I was in Dallas, I'd put a dollar in the farmer's mailbox as a fee to fish his pond in Howe, Texas. Wow. Things have changed.Tom Bean
No doubt. +1,000,000Rogue One might be no.1 on my list. It was so well written and carried out. Then the Vader scene at the end… chef’s kiss.