Nevermind that it supplies data to all 32 NFL teams and near 100 college football programs.
Let's just say their grades are "Done differently." Their grades have Banks as the best OL on the team? Do you ignore that or agree with it?
As long as the grading scale is carried out with the same criteria across the board then the data is something you can draw conclusions on. Same as Alex's deep dig grades. It doesn't matter what the final number is it matters what you can compare it against based on the same grading criteria. We can quibble about sample size, bias, etc but until a computer is grading them, you can pick a part anyone's analytics.
The issue with the Deep Dig is that it compares this year's O-line against much maligned O-line's of the past decade. So when you say "Hey it's much improved!" It's a lot like saying a 7-5 record is much improved over 5-7. A lot like our football program currently. It's improved, but it ain't great.
I realize it's your job here to provide an opinion to your readers. Don't get me wrong here, Alex does a fantastic job and it's probably one of the most valuable columns on the board. It's also way less travled than your 10 thoughts because it actually requires critical thinking. But the context of comparing today's team vs other poor results doesn't really paint the picture of where the bar needs to be, to be considered good. Texas has had 2 OL drafted in the last decade. Alabama has had 13. Want to compare grades with them over the last decade? It's what should be done instead of leading with QB controversy type headlines. I get it, it doesn't move the needle for clicks.
Anyhow, you devalue your credibility with people who either understand the game or take the time to get beyond blanket statements not backed by research. And you are really doing a disservice to the players and coaches when you let out an opinion that says something like "Sark took the ball out of Quinn's hands."
I'm not trying to war with you, strong opinions are good for business, even if they are faulty. What is the price of misinformation? Nobody is going to be as successful as you by starting a site and giving factual game day breakdown. The thousands of casual viewers couldn't give a crap about the protection, the reads, the breakdowns etc. They just want a winning result. Such is life. I just think you could be better.