The previous drive to the 22 consecutive runs was a 50-50 mix of run/pass... right up until Ewers gave the other team the lead.
I'm ok with you disagreeing with me, though. It happens.
You can spin it by calling it 50/50 run-pass because using those words helps you sell your opinion better but you should at least list what those 50/50 passes were.
Ewers was sacked on 3 consecutive called passes to end the first half. One of those being his own fault.
In the second half he completes a hitch to Worthy on a 3 step drop.
Then he throws a screen to J Witt that gets blown up because Milton blocks nobody. Milton gets pulled.
The next pass play Bijan doesn’t pick up the free man coming off the edge and Ewers escapes to complete the pass.
The next pass was the J Witt fumble where we used 8 blockers on 1st and 20 & 2 guys are coming free in about 2.5 seconds. It was a really good throw. And we needed 8 men blocking to provide that amount of time.
From that point on the next 4 passes Sark calls were WR screens. This is your 50/50 pass you keep talking about but the goose was already cooked.
Then the sack fumble where we bring in an extra tackle who blocks air on a fake screen and go deep shot.
I’ll concede Ewers has to protect the ball that’s just a fact.
Sark didn’t take the ball away from him tho. This O-line had their worst pass protection day of the season. I guess he did by proxy. But you’re fooling yourself if you think we don’t pass had the running game sputtered us in to a 3rd and long.
1) hitch
1) blown assignment/scramble completion
1) blown assignment sack/fumble with an extra tackle against a 4 man rush.
1) 8 man pass protection to block 6
3) Sacks
5) WR Screens
That’s the last 12 passing plays of the game.
I’m fine disagreeing with you because you’re simply wrong on the Baylor game.
