ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend (Time for the UT staff to do its thing...)

What record would Sark need in 2022 to keep him off of at least a warm seat going into 2023 following a 5-7 year one?
I think 8 regular season wins is the minimum number here. The seat will get pretty warm is that expectation is not met.
 
Running back yardage against Baylor in the 4th quarter when protecting a lead...

19 yards on 4 carries.

Again, when it mattered most, the running game didn't get it done.
You keep saying the running game didn't get it done, which is accurate I guess, but isn't it because they weren't given the chance to get it done? I mean almost 5 yards a carry in the fourth against Baylor seems good enough to me if they are getting more carries. I understand the point you're making, but the bigger problem is the offence maybe one or two times didn't get a first down then the defense gave up the lead and then we went to passing the ball almost every play.
 
Where's my content piece on Arch?!!!
 
Last edited:
I'd agree with you if the staff hadn't been an abject failure in year one on the football side of their jobs.
Totally agree. They need to get it done this year. I am assuming Flood is one saying he can make it work with what he has and what is coming in August. He cannot be wrong 2 years in a row.
 
I saw it late one night, didn't love it and have never returned to it. 🤷‍♂️

walk-hard-the-dewey-cox-story.gif
 
I hate the thought that there was some kind of implied promise not to chase top OL in the portal to our incoming Freshmen OL recruits. That feels like perpetuation of the entitlement culture that we're trying to stamp out.

I wonder if Saban consults with any of his incoming Freshmen on who he should and should not pursue in the portal?

Maybe the Brockermeyers should have their feelings hurt that Nick is chasing the Vandy Xfer OL guy and enter the portal themselves and come back to Texas?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gregory I
This coaching staff has showed zero interest in either of the last two off-seasons to lean on the portal for any OL help.

Last year, they were just stupid.

This year, they clearly didn't want to interfere with any of the recruitments of high level HS prospects, which is easy to understand and I think they might feel like if they change their tune and go after someone, it'll mean they weren't true to their word with the OL prospects coming in and might get in the way of their development.

I don't agree with taking that kind of risk, but I understand it more than I did a year ago when they just ignored their weaknesses because they thought they could make it work.

There's literally a left tackle from Vandy in the Portal right now that Alabama is pursuing that Texas hasn't really made any effort with. It is what it is.
I thank you for your volunteering that info regarding the Vandy OT. It makes the point very clear that they want to build, rightly or wrongly, the OL, especially, from HS recruits.
 
The big debate over our running game stats aside, the reality is that the offense had numerous opportunities to help a struggling gassed defense out late in games and mostly failed to lend a hand at those critical moments.

The D is getting gashed late and the O goes on the field and throws up a quick 3 and out for -2 yards while running about 90 seconds off the clock. Then we net 30 - 35 yards on a punt and throw the D right back out on the field with the ball near midfield after they've barely had a chance to take a breadth.

Coaches talk about playing "complementary football" and last year was the antithesis of this strategy ... thus the 5 - 7 record.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ketchum
I mean look at next years schedule. Ok Alabama is probably an ass whipping but otherwise who do they play that has more talent? Baylor? OU? OK st? I don't think any of those teams are more talented.
Look at last year's schedule! We had probably more talent than everyone except OK. Definitely more talent than West Virginia and a Kansas team that won only one other football game all season against... the South Dakota Coyotes.

I hate to say it but Texas has been doing less with more talent since 2009 than anyone.

I'm optimistic that this staff will do better in a couple of years (although that optimism is probably unearned as of yet), but as a firm believer in "You're only as good as your O-Line and D-Line" I have to think we're a couple of years away regardless of how many high 4 and 5 star QB's and RB's we have.
 
The big debate over our running game stats aside, the reality is that the offense had numerous opportunities to help a struggling gassed defense out late in games and mostly failed to lend a hand at those critical moments.

The D is getting gashed late and the O goes on the field and throws up a quick 3 and out for -2 yards while running about 90 seconds off the clock. Then we net 30 - 35 yards on a punt and throw the D right back out on the field with the ball near midfield after they've barely had a chance to take a breadth.

Coaches talk about playing "complementary football" and last year was the antithesis of this strategy ... thus the 5 - 7 record.
Running game, passing game... they all HINGE on the O-Line. We had a poor O-Line last year and I'm a little concerned (mostly because of the youth) that we're at least one more year away from that changing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gregory I
You keep saying the running game didn't get it done, which is accurate I guess, but isn't it because they weren't given the chance to get it done? I mean almost 5 yards a carry in the fourth against Baylor seems good enough to me if they are getting more carries. I understand the point you're making, but the bigger problem is the offence maybe one or two times didn't get a first down then the defense gave up the lead and then we went to passing the ball almost every play.
I think the running game was definitely solid, it just wasn't elite. we're debating really fine margins here. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: UTAlum
I hate the thought that there was some kind of implied promise not to chase top OL in the portal to our incoming Freshmen OL recruits. That feels like perpetuation of the entitlement culture that we're trying to stamp out.

I wonder if Saban consults with any of his incoming Freshmen on who he should and should not pursue in the portal?

Maybe the Brockermeyers should have their feelings hurt that Nick is chasing the Vandy Xfer OL guy and enter the portal themselves and come back to Texas?
I just think they didn't believe they had the leverage to openly take players that could block immediate playing time available. That was the big sale's pitch.
 
I thank you for your volunteering that info regarding the Vandy OT. It makes the point very clear that they want to build, rightly or wrongly, the OL, especially, from HS recruits.

Yeah, it's one thing to be able to not be in the final 5s for a kid like Tyler Steen, but it's another to just ignore every player like him that has become available.

Baylor doesn't win the Big 12 last year without their incoming OL transfers.
 
Whichever one emerges as the starter?

I could see DJ Campbell as an honorable mention All-BIg 12 player as a true freshman.
I know you're setting the table to discuss the mileage we should expect to get in 2022 from our high priced coaching staff, but I can't help but push. How can we expect an 8-4 overall record, 6-3 in conference and 3rd place in conference, without
expecting a 3rd team all conference left tackle and 3rd team all conference QB? Not potentially but expectedly.
 
It’s just really odd that I haven’t accidentally stumbled across anything containing real meat on a kid in what feels like a couple years of him being the top player in the nation with tons of buzz. There’s lots of stuff out there about him, but it never contains anything other than gossip column type stuff with an assumption that he’s just obviously the consensus best player in the nation. Like everyone just goes along with it and there’s not any real break downs or comps or evidence against peers or top players. It’s weird for a player in that spot.
 
I know you're setting the table to discuss the mileage we should expect to get in 2022 from our high priced coaching staff, but I can't help but push. How can we expect an 8-4 overall record, 6-3 in conference and 3rd place in conference, without
expecting a 3rd team all conference left tackle and 3rd team all conference QB? Not potentially but expectedly.

Texas has pulled off 8-4 without those things, no?
 
It’s just really odd that I haven’t accidentally stumbled across anything containing real meat on a kid in what feels like a couple years of him being the top player in the nation with tons of buzz. There’s lots of stuff out there about him, but it never contains anything other than gossip column type stuff with an assumption that he’s just obviously the consensus best player in the nation. Like everyone just goes along with it and there’s not any real break downs or comps or evidence against peers or top players. It’s weird for a player in that spot.
Last week got away from me because of personal reasons. I'll get it done, damnit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McGuapo
Apples and oranges. He wasn't a legacy like those two.
I’m talking strictly on “missed opportunity“ purely on the impact the players have during their career. I didn’t weigh the legacy aspect but see how that might make it sting more.
 
I love Boogie Nights.

One could make a decent argument that Boogie Nights took his career to the next level. FWIW, and I forgot about this off the radar movie, but he's also good in The Good Girl opposite Jennifer Aniston.
 
The truth of the matter is that the season's average was aided significantly by the 763 yards on 93 carries (8.20) in two games against Rice and Texas Tech. If you take the games against those two minnows out of the equation, the average drops almost an entire yard, and suddenly the running game numbers become very average.
I 100% agree that OL improvement, both run and pass blocking, is probably the determining factor in this year's team success. And finding a pass rush on D.

But my inner math nerd can't help but nitpick. If you take away the best 2 rushing games of just about any team in the country I'm guessing the remaining numbers look very average. Of course I don't have any numbers to support that.
 
Here's my Top 10 Reilly list. I doubt many will agree on the order.

10. The Perfect Storm
9. The Aviator
8. For the Love of the Game
7. Chicago
6. Wreck-It Ralph
5. Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby
4. Magnolia
3. Gangs of New York
2. Boogie Nights
1. Step Brothers tie Walk Hard-the Dewey Cox Story
Obvious correction needed.
giphy.gif

AnimatedSharpIguanodon-max-1mb.gif

AggressiveWhichAmethystinepython-size_restricted.gif

BrilliantDisastrousDeermouse-size_restricted.gif
 
One could make a decent argument that Boogie Nights took his career to the next level. FWIW, and I forgot about this off the radar movie, but he's also good in The Good Girl opposite Jennifer Aniston.
I don't remember that one. Off to Youtube I go!
 
I 100% agree that OL improvement, both run and pass blocking, is probably the determining factor in this year's team success. And finding a pass rush on D.

But my inner math nerd can't help but nitpick. If you take away the best 2 rushing games of just about any team in the country I'm guessing the remaining numbers look very average. Of course I don't have any numbers to support that.
No, not with truly elite ground games. That's the point.

It falls off a cliff to some degree if a team with a strong pulse shows up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hookem62
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT