Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend: 24 Hours Later...

[rylo7956rylo]

That stat blew my mind.

17 of the 18 were while he was at Washington and 9 of them were against top 10 teams. Remember back then Oregon, USC, and Stanford were really good and they played LSU and a couple of other top 10 teams. That what happens win you take over a winless program

 

[FrancoBevo]

What is best for the long term future of your program, Casey Thompson or Hudson Card. You are not going to improve the talent on this awful offensive line this year. Do you feel its better at this point to let Card grow into the QB we all think he can be and take his lumps growing up, or do you pacify your fickle fan base and send Thompson out to be in this spot again next spring or worse because Card bails out and your backups are Murphy and Charles Wright.

You do what is necessary to win football games now because you are at the edge of the recruiting irrelevance abyss. Texas doesn’t have anymore “just trust us, we’re building something great” cards to play on the recruiting trail.

 

[McGuapo]

As far as the QBs go, as @Ketchum likes to say, my eyes tell me Thompson is most prepared to win at this point. When you watch them each play the game, it seems a different level of confidence and aggression exists with Casey. That’s just what my eyes tell me watching the real bullets fly. However, I don’t think Card is done by any means, but in an all time close battle, according to the QB guru, allowing the other guy to have a real opportunity doesn’t look bad, I don’t care what you did in a couple practices with the backups. I’m pretty sure some great coaches have had QB controversies over the years and gone back and forth in an effort to find the right answers for a particular team. I just think that part of your argument is overplayed. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t have some ego tied to the decision, however.

As far as the OL, if there aren’t a couple changes made there, I really need to hear the coaches explain that. You have to at least try a couple different combinations.

 

[McGuapo]

Another side item to this QB conversation. Going with Casey and if he does grab the reins and take off, gives Sark a kind of get out of jail card for the Arky game. He can sell it to everyone as kind of a different team moving forward. Doesn’t mean he buries Card, but he can just ride the wave and have somewhat of a plausible aberration for one game.

 

[SR60]

It's Simple Jack from Tropic Thunder.

It was my response to being called a simpleton.

interesting. never watched that movie completely just a few scenes here and there. plenty of over the top performances in that one. need to put it on the "watch" list.

 

[Marshall07]

Buy

Sell

Sell - I didn't think it was THAT bad.

Supr buy

I have watched the last two games and I think one thing that is missing is strength and conditioning. We have been being pushed around in the first two games. That was not the case with Tom Herman and Yancy McKnight. McKnight prepared them with heavy lifting and running.

 

[86LawHorn]

Yikes, what a lot of bad analysis. Sark gave Casey a ton of reps since he got hired. He gave Card a lot as well. And then he announced that Card was his starter but Casey would play. Fans and mods gave the typical "you need to pick one and stick with him" "if you have two you dont have one" knee jerk reactions. But the fact is Sark was clearly never convinced Card was ready, and he knew Casey might well be needed. He gave Casey real time in Game 1, not garbage time. That game wasnt cemented until Casey finished it off. That action alone refutes Ketch's assertion that Card was the "one". Further the assertion that one guy got an "overwhelming majority of reps" ignores the past 8 months of practices and training.

Sure Sark thought Card might be ready to take off this year, and then come back for 2-3 more. But he hedged that bet with Casey. Smart move, misunderstood by fans at the time, and clearly by mods even now. Sark is playing to win now, this year. He isnt going to punt a season hoping to set up future years. Everything he has said big picture wise since he was hired is he is here to win, now.

He is going to play the QB that gives him the best chance to win conference games Just like Saban does, just like Day does, just like Swinney does. He thought Card could be that guy. He gave himself the ability to switch, which he may well do. He is playing chess. Analysts of his moves are playing checkers. Sark didnt hitch his saddle to either guy, Ketch is laughably wrong on that front as well. Sark wont truly commit on a QB until the Tech game, at the earliest, Rice is another exhibition affair.

The only one panicking are fans and mods. This coaching staff is light years ahead of the past decades. They are going to make mistakes, sure. But much of the nonsense on message boards is just that, ridiculous over reaction.

So after Sarks announcement today, we now know that the angst by Ketch and other posters was wasted energy. Sark is playing chess while the chicken littles are playing with their marbles. Sark found out early that Card, while still full of potential, isnt quite ready to jump into the spotlight. Better in Arky than the Cotton bowl.

Funny that all these angst laden posts failed to recognize how Saban has often used two QBs to win big. Maybe silly axioms like two Qbs = zero Qbs are indeed just silly.

 

[Ketchum]

17 of the 18 were while he was at Washington and 9 of them were against top 10 teams. Remember back then Oregon, USC, and Stanford were really good and they played LSU and a couple of other top 10 teams. That what happens win you take over a winless program

I would hop most were at Washington. He wasn't at USC very long.

 

[Ketchum]

As far as the QBs go, as @Ketchum likes to say, my eyes tell me Thompson is most prepared to win at this point. When you watch them each play the game, it seems a different level of confidence and aggression exists with Casey. That’s just what my eyes tell me watching the real bullets fly. However, I don’t think Card is done by any means, but in an all time close battle, according to the QB guru, allowing the other guy to have a real opportunity doesn’t look bad, I don’t care what you did in a couple practices with the backups. I’m pretty sure some great coaches have had QB controversies over the years and gone back and forth in an effort to find the right answers for a particular team. I just think that part of your argument is overplayed. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t have some ego tied to the decision, however.

As far as the OL, if there aren’t a couple changes made there, I really need to hear the coaches explain that. You have to at least try a couple different combinations.

The thing with this OL is that they've been married to it since they arrived. This group of guys has been there group of guys and no efforts to change that have bene made.

 

[Ketchum]

interesting. never watched that movie completely just a few scenes here and there. plenty of over the top performances in that one. need to put it on the "watch" list.

Yes, you do.

 

[Ketchum]

So after Sarks announcement today, we now know that the angst by Ketch and other posters was wasted energy. Sark is playing chess while the chicken littles are playing with their marbles. Sark found out early that Card, while still full of potential, isnt quite ready to jump into the spotlight. Better in Arky than the Cotton bowl.

Funny that all these angst laden posts failed to recognize how Saban has often used two QBs to win big. Maybe silly axioms like two Qbs = zero Qbs are indeed just silly.

a. Sark might be doing a lot of things, but making a quarterback change in week three of the season after a 19-point loss against a rival is not playing chess.

b. What you call "angst" is really just discussion. The idea that I wrote in "angst" is what is silly.

 

[86LawHorn]

a. Sark might be doing a lot of things, but making a quarterback change in week three of the season after a 19-point loss against a rival is not playing chess.

b. What you call "angst" is really just discussion. The idea that I wrote in "angst" is what is silly.

1. Nick Saban laughs.

2. A new coach, with two Qbs with very limited playing experience, who were running neck and neck in months of practice, is certainly entitled to get a look at both in real time before picking his horse.

3. Your OP drips of angst, and exaggerated implications, for Sark picking a Qb or changing his mind. For example...

What Sarkisian does next is fascinating on multiple fronts. Consider the following:

* Making a switch after two games would essentially translate to Sarkisian admitting that he not only hitched his saddle to the wrong guy, but that he's been wasting a lot of important time and reps since the first scrimmage of August when he positioned Card to take the overwhelming majority of the reps in each practice outside of the one that occurred on the day before he actually told the quarterbacks of his decision.

* In choosing Card as his starter in August, Sarkisian unofficially announced that Card was his quarterback for the future. One of the elements of Sarkisian's decision that was discussed all season was that the winner of the job in 2021 might set the winner up to be the long-term answer at the position, meaning that Sarkisian would need to be prrepared to lose the loser of the battle to a transfe at some point.

4. In fact, none of this is based in reality. Sark said Card would start and Casey would play. Clearly he wasnt convinced Card was the clearly best Qb. Just that he was going to get the first shot at being the starter, until he showed he wasnt ready. Which Card sadly did Saturday. Though I still would bet Sark thinks Card will be an elite performer at some point, just not today.

 

[Ketchum]

1. Nick Saban laughs.

2. A new coach, with two Qbs with very limited playing experience, who were running neck and neck in months of practice, is certainly entitled to get a look at both in real time before picking his horse.

3. Your OP drips of angst, and exaggerated implications, for Sark picking a Qb or changing his mind. For example...

What Sarkisian does next is fascinating on multiple fronts. Consider the following:

* Making a switch after two games would essentially translate to Sarkisian admitting that he not only hitched his saddle to the wrong guy, but that he's been wasting a lot of important time and reps since the first scrimmage of August when he positioned Card to take the overwhelming majority of the reps in each practice outside of the one that occurred on the day before he actually told the quarterbacks of his decision.

* In choosing Card as his starter in August, Sarkisian unofficially announced that Card was his quarterback for the future. One of the elements of Sarkisian's decision that was discussed all season was that the winner of the job in 2021 might set the winner up to be the long-term answer at the position, meaning that Sarkisian would need to be prrepared to lose the loser of the battle to a transfe at some point.

4. In fact, none of this is based in reality. Sark said Card would start and Casey would play. Clearly he wasnt convinced Card was the clearly best Qb. Just that he was going to get the first shot at being the starter, until he showed he wasnt ready. Which Card sadly did Saturday. Though I still would bet Sark thinks Card will be an elite performer at some point, just not today.

When has Nick Saban ever replaced a starting quarterback after two games?

Are you of the opinion that replacing a guy in a game is the same thing?

Is this your intellectual capacity?

 

[Utexex1989]

Now we know that Casey will start against Rice. My take on Sark is that he's not worried about making the switch. The bottom line is not whether he made the wrong decision naming Card QB1 at the beginning of the season (he did); the bottom line is what he does to steer the team to maximize the season from this very low point.

I agree, though, that he should have pulled Card at half-time, if not before, when he just wasn't moving the offense, and was missing A LOT. It wasn't just a couple of bad deep throws. It seems like for a bunch of snaps, he was just a step behind. I commented multiple times after Card was named QB1 that you'll have to expect at least one, but maybe more, games like Saturday. That's just the nature of going with the untested redshirt freshman. If I were running things, it would have been the exact opposite of what we've had so far this year: Casey as QB1 with Card coming in for meaning reps in the games. Even I have said, as the president of the Casey Fan Club, that it's possible the Card would eventually take over the team this year as he gains more in game experience. In my opinion, it was a mistake to overlook Casey's under the lights experience and the performance in the bowl taking over when the game was certainly not won yet (and we were not moving the ball well with Sam in there). If they were both producing similarly in practice and camp, Casey should have gotten the edge with his in game performances. Anyway, unless Sark just lets Casey start Rice and puts Card back in as starter for Tech, I feel like we're in the best possible position to maximize wins this year - whatever that number turns out to be.

 

[Ketchum]

Now we know that Casey will start against Rice. My take on Sark is that he's not worried about making the switch. The bottom line is not whether he made the wrong decision naming Card QB1 at the beginning of the season (he did); the bottom line is what he does to steer the team to maximize the season from this very low point.

I agree, though, that he should have pulled Card at half-time, if not before, when he just wasn't moving the offense, and was missing A LOT. It wasn't just a couple of bad deep throws. It seems like for a bunch of snaps, he was just a step behind. I commented multiple times after Card was named QB1 that you'll have to expect at least one, but maybe more, games like Saturday. That's just the nature of going with the untested redshirt freshman. If I were running things, it would have been the exact opposite of what we've had so far this year: Casey as QB1 with Card coming in for meaning reps in the games. Even I have said, as the president of the Casey Fan Club, that it's possible the Card would eventually take over the team this year as he gains more in game experience. In my opinion, it was a mistake to overlook Casey's under the lights experience and the performance in the bowl taking over when the game was certainly not won yet (and we were not moving the ball well with Sam in there). If they were both producing similarly in practice and camp, Casey should have gotten the edge with his in game performances. Anyway, unless Sark just lets Casey start Rice and puts Card back in as starter for Tech, I feel like we're in the best possible position to maximize wins this year - whatever that number turns out to be.

I would just simply say that if you're only going to let your young freshman quarterback have 2 1/2 bad quarters before you take the job away from him, you probably shouldn't have given him the job in the first place.

As it stands, he's given Card less room for growth and margin of error than any other player that has been starting on the roster.

 

[SR60]

Another side item to this QB conversation. Going with Casey and if he does grab the reins and take off, gives Sark a kind of get out of jail card for the Arky game. He can sell it to everyone as kind of a different team moving forward. Doesn’t mean he buries Card, but he can just ride the wave and have somewhat of a plausible aberration for one game.

sorry amigo ..the only way Sark gets to wash his hands of that disaster is win a national title while he's at Texas.

that was an embarrassment and Sark owns it.

 

[txsfight]

I would just simply say that if you're only going to let your young freshman quarterback have 2 1/2 bad quarters before you take the job away from him, you probably shouldn't have given him the job in the first place.

As it stands, he's given Card less room for growth and margin of error than any other player that has been starting on the roster.

Every single player on this team should be looking over their shoulder. None of them (save maybe Bijan) deserve any benefit of the doubt. If their psyches are so fragile they can’t handle being bench for sucking then they’re in the wrong business. At least Thompson has demonstrated a skill of making plays with his feet when plays breakdown which they do often with this Oline. He seems more geared to the “stop thinking and play” mind set.

 

[largeutfan]

The mod here is cornered. The head coach is making decisions to win games, one at a time. The head coach is making decisions to treat amazing QBs with utmost respect. The mod should treat his readership the same.

 

[McGuapo]

The thing with this OL is that they've been married to it since they arrived. This group of guys has been there group of guys and no efforts to change that have bene made.

I just don’t think it’s such a new group that you can just pass it off as they need more time together. We’ve seen that. It’s not good enough and I refuse to believe the alternative could be any worse.

 

[EdSimmonsPants]

Ok, let's talk about it.

As president of the Hudson Card Fan Club, the last thing I can do after my guy posted a quarterback rating nearly 100 points lower than his previous game is bury the discussion down a few sections. In the face of the hottest kitchen Card has ever entered, he didn't so much as blink when the flame got near him as he simply allowed himself to become engulfed into flame over the course of nearly three quarters of action.

While he wasn't throwing the ball into dangerous areas that led to turnovers, that can't be the best part of your performance. We can't come out of a game and say that the best part of a quarterback's performance is that he didn't have too many disasters. Card wasn't good enough on Saturday. He missed throws that should have put points on the scoreboard. His eyes never seemed to find what they wanted to look for and he didn't lead the offense to remotely enough success.

At halftime, Card was 4 of 8 for 39 yards and he simply wasn't giving the offense enough. Even the president of his fan club can admit that Sarkisian looked like Rocky Balboa refusing to throw the towel while Ivan Drago was seconds away from killing Apollo Creed because of a need to protect the ego of his guy.

It's hard to believe that Sarkisian's old boss Nick Saban would have hesitated to make a switch at halftime, considering we've seen him pull the plug on much more accomplished players than Card when the moment calls for it.

At 16-0, the moment was screaming for a change, all in the name of doing what was best for the team in the next 30 minutes of action. That the hook didn't come until the game was effectively over at 33-7 is completely on Sarkisian.

Perhaps it's unfair to suggest that Sarkisian hesitated because he didn't want to create a quarterback debate with a switch six quarters into the season, but it's hard to fathom what else he could have been thinking in not making the switch. Sometimes a guy just doesn't have it and Card didn't have it on this night. Leaving him in did Card and the team about as many favors as Balboa not throwing the towel in did for Creed.

Ironically, if Sarkisian was trying to avoid a debate at the most important position on the field, he failed because that's where we absolutely are heading into the Rice game this week after Casey Thompson outperformed Card in his limited time to a large enough degree that many of those reading this article might riot at DKR is a change isn't made.

What Sarkisian does next is fascinating on multiple fronts. Consider the following:

* Making a switch after two games would essentially translate to Sarkisian admitting that he not only hitched his saddle to the wrong guy, but that he's been wasting a lot of important time and reps since the first scrimmage of August when he positioned Card to take the overwhelming majority of the reps in each practice outside of the one that occurred on the day before he actually told the quarterbacks of his decision.

* In choosing Card as his starter in August, Sarkisian unofficially announced that Card was his quarterback for the future. One of the elements of Sarkisian's decision that was discussed all season was that the winner of the job in 2021 might set the winner up to be the long-term answer at the position, meaning that Sarkisian would need to be prepared to lose the loser of the battle to a transfer at some point. There's been so much discussion about Thompson leaving immediately, but there's little question that both players would likely have a big issue with sitting through the 2022 season. If Sarkisian makes a switch in the third game of the season, it's fair to wonder exactly where the long-term future of the position stands.

* Few will watch the Rice game and believe that the result of the game means much after what happened on Saturday night, but it's exactly the kind of game that could provide a platform for whomever he chooses to begin the process of building momentum that would allow him to keep the job moving forward.

* Sarkisian's team is watching all of this closely. They'll know that Thompson outplayed Card in Fayetteville. They'll know that if it had been any other position on the field, such a thing would matter with regards to future playing time.

Bottom line - Sarkisian has a lot to think about. Either decision has implications that go beyond who gives the team the best chance to win against Rice.

Is he ready to make it?

His actions suggested the answer is yes, and that the answer was Card. His actions also suggest that confidence in his decision-making among the Texas fan base has been shaken in less than 90 minutes of action as the coach.

Whatever happens, the eyes of Texas are watching and ready to render some judgments based on what happens next.

It's never easy around this place, is it?

No. 2 - For the record ...

I'm torn on what I think should happen at the quarterback decision.

On one hand, I'm not a fan of giving up on the guy you thought was the quarterback of the future after 2 1/2 quarters of bad football because it screams of a panic move by a coach that doesn't know what he's doing.

On the other hand, I'm not a fan of suggesting that what happened on Saturday night shouldn't matter at all.

If I had a third hand, I'd also say I'm not a fan of a decision being made on what happens in practice this week.

At the end of the day, Sarkisian needs to trust himself, but if it were me, I'd probably treat a Rice team that just got worked 44-7 by Houston as a platform for both to decide what happens next on the field in actual games. Both would play in the first quarter and throughout the game.

It's far from ideal, but nothing about where things stand is ideal. I'd probably start Card because I'm not going to quit on Card after one miserable half of football, but Thompson doesn't deserve to simply slide back into the kind of back-up role he's been in the first two games.

No. 3 - Discussing Kyle Flood ...

There are three things that I believe represent a bit of an early indictment on the coach that was supposed to be the answer of the offensive line problems that just won't go away.

1. The choice to stand with a pat hand throughout the off-season and not really make any effort to improve the starting options in the transfer portal was just a terrible decision and it's one that everyone that has followed the program closely knew was a terrible decision.

2. Flood's recruiting in the 2022 class hasn't been good enough at this point. There's still room to change this before the 2022 class puts pen to paper, but up until now, it hasn't been good enough.

3. There's not a single starter on the offensive line that I can tell with my naked eye has made progress from last year to this year, which is the single biggest indictment of all at this early stage of the season. The offensive line actually played pretty well in the final two games of the 2020 season with almost the same exact personnel that exists this year and the results from this group right now are borderline horrifying.

I'm not saying that Flood warrants being on the hot seat or anything like that, but we also can't ignore what has actually happened right now just because Flood came from Alabama, is making a ton of money and is Sarkisian's guy.

No. 4 - More randomness with a day to chew on things ...

... It is less incredibly worrisome that Sarkisian is 0-19 in games when his teams have fallen behind by 10+ at halftime than it is that he has been behind by 10+ at halftime in more than 20-percent of the games he's put together as a head coach. The math says what happened last night won't be the last time it happens this season. Hell, the math says it might happen more than once before this season is complete.

... What exactly what Sarkisian's plan in this game? When you look at the early scripting of the offense, I can't tell who he thought needed to get the ball. Where we the screens and short throws that might have allowed his quarterback to get into some kind of groove? Why are they not finding a way to get the ball into Xavier Worthy's hands with end arounds, screens and other plays that can get him in space? Why did it take nearly three quarters for Joshua Moore to get a target? I just don't have any idea what the plan was.

... The defense deserves credit for keeping the Longhorns in the game through the second quarter, but there were some guys that stopped giving maximum effort in the second half and that just can't happen.

... We've talked about the pass rush being a question mark all off-season and there never really appeared to be anyone that was getting close to K.J. Jefferson when he dropped back to pass, as the Longhorns finished as a team with zero sacks and two quarterback hits. This is going to be a problem all year.

... Joshua Moore can't go catchless over 60 minutes. It feels like that's the kind of thing that happened last season after he'd catch a couple of touchdowns the previous week. How are we not beyond that kind of thing happening?

... There were five players I thought could hold their heads up high on Sunday ... Bijan Robinson, Casey Thompson, DeMarvion Overshown, Anthony Cook and B.J. Foster.

... Cook is very quietly having an excellent start to the season. Whatever success is occurring against the Longhorns in the passing game isn't occurring on his watch so far.

... Luke Brockermeyer's lack of athleticism and speed felt like a problem on Saturday night. He'll have better days moving forward, but he just seemed a tick slow in getting to the football for a lot of the game.

No. 5 – ICYMI ...

It's year seven of our post-game show and I'm pretty sure we've never had more people watching than we did in the aftermath of Saturday night.

View embedded media

No. 6 - A little love for the Texas volleyball team ...

The No.1-ranked Longhorns moved to 7-0 on Sunday with a four-set win over Notre Dame, which followed a four-set win over Arizona on Friday night.

So far this season, the only question has been whether the Longhorns will lose a game, not whether they'll lose a match.

If only it could be like this in football.

View embedded media

No. 7 – BUY or SELL …

(Sell) Sadly, I've done so many of these after awful losses over the last decade-plus that I'm just numb to it all. No dread.



(Sell) I don't know many coaches that are willing to admit being terribly wrong after just two games. It might be the wrong decision, but changing quarterbacks at this stage would make Sarkisian look like he doesn't know what he's been doing for the last month.



(Sell) Exactly as Tom Herman did, Sark overestimated the level of talent on the current coaching staff.



(Buy) I'll just let the facts speak for themselves. In my 25 years of doing rankings, all six of the quarterbacks I've ever ranked as five-stars that have finished their eligibility have played in the NFL and five of the six were drafted by NFL teams. If we extend the list to quarterbacks I've rated as high four-stars, the numbers are eight of 11 of the highest-ranked quarterbacks I've ever evaluated have played in the NFL. If we extend the data to include all mid four-star quarterbacks, the numbers turn into 11 of the 20 highest-ranked quarterbacks I've ever ranked have turned into NFL players.

You let me know a single person on the planet that has a better track record than that with evaluating high school players and I'll let you talk all the mess you want.



(Sell) Largely, the realistic expectations for this program centered on an 8-4 or 9-3 season. No one on Orangebloods picked this team to make the Big 12 Championship game.



(Sell) The schedule outside of Oklahoma the rest of the way is full of a bunch of crap. Just don't get overly excited when Texas potentially proves to be less crappy than the rest of the teams in the Big 12.



(Sell) lulz.



(Sell) Last night was an abomination in all three phases of the game, the coaching staff, the overall effort and intensity.



(Buy) He's real good. Just ask Sarkisian.



(Sell) There have been teams in the last decade that didn't have any NFL-level draftable players on the roster. That's not the case with this team. I mean ... 2014-16 happened.



(Sell) Texas is still in the running with Campbell, but this was a damaging loss in the pursuit of Stewart IMO.



(Buy) Decent might be good enough in the Big 12 this season.



(Sell) Texas has a bunch of four-star players on the roster that are marginally more valuable than three stars. It has too few five-stars and high four-star level talent.



(Sell) All of the above.



(Sell) I'll take the under.



(Sell) I'm not sure average helps change what happened last night at all.



(Sell) Part of what will make this game miserable in future weeks will be seeing Arkansas exposed as just an ok team over 12 games. Rice was more competitive last week than Texas was this week.



(Sell) I don't really understand this question at all. Ash's sophomore season in 2012 is probably the best quarterback season of the last decade, unless you want to argue that Sam Ehlinger in 2018 was better. Regardless, Ash's career was sidetracked by injuries, which isn't an issue with Card. Maybe put some respect on Ash's name.



(Sell) No, the early returns do not suggest that yet.



(Buy) Bingo. We were supposed to be beyond this team getting its ass kicked to such levels that Charlie Strong's worst teams get mentioned as comparisons.



(Sell) Let me introduce you to Arsenal TV. (NSFW)

View embedded media

(Buy) Of course. He's one of the best coaches in the history of college football. He might be an awful human being that would have hired a racist strength coach and tolerated all sorts of felonies from the players on his roster, but he wouldn't get skull-banged on national television at this level.



(Sell) This was settled last night. Kayla wore a watch last night.

View embedded media

No. 8 - Scattershooting on the sports weekend ...

... The moment when you knew Ohio State was in trouble.

View embedded media

... Iowa State returned 20+ senior just so that it could get thrashed at home and have its starting senior quarterback benched against its in-state rival. Woof.

... I have to believe Florida State fans felt worse on Saturday night than Texas fans. Someone ask @DustinMcComas for an opinion.

... My fantasy football team's first three picks combined for less than 15 points and I likely lost my fifth round pick (Jerry Jeudy) for the entire season after a third quarter injury.

... Are the Texans any good or is Urban Meyer about to flame out in Jacksonville in historic fashion?

... If you had the 49ers at -8.5, I'm really sorry for your weekend.

... Chandler Jones is a damn monster.

... Daniil Medvedev shut down Novak Djokovic's run for history. I didn't see that coming at all.

... Emma Raducanu is going to be a superstar tennis player that crosses over into the public mainstream in a big way. Huge talent. Magnetic personality. Let's hope the British tabloids don't ruin her.

... My first mention of cricket in 20 years of Orangebloods...

View embedded media

No. 9 - Top 10 Most Believable Actors as Athletes in Movies ...

Two weeks ago, Michael J. Fox topped the least of the least believable actors in sports movies, which means this week we'll look at the actors that were the most believable.

Rule: Actors that played the sport that they are nominated in at the professional level were not eligible for the list.

10. Hilary Swank as Maggie Fitzgerald (Million Dollar Baby)
9. Maris Valainis as Jimmy Chitwood (Hoosiers)
8. Kurt Russell as Reno Hightower (Best of Times)
7. William Zabka as Johnny Lawrence (The Karate Kid)
6. Kevin Coster as Roy McAvoy (Tin Cup)
5. Robert DeNiro as Jake LaMotta (Raging Bull)
4. Charlie Sheen as Rick Vaughn (Major League)
3. Cuba Gooding, Jr. as Rod Tidwell (Jerry MaGuire)
2. Jamie Foxx as Willie Beaman (Any Given Sunday)
1. Carl Weathers as Apollo Creed (Rocky, Rocky II, Ricky III and Ricky IV)

No. 10 - And Finally ...

This video deserves its own section and this cat now has one less life to use up on its path towards nine.

View embedded media

All I know is that @TurfHorn should not have been the first one to read this. You gotta get someone to read your copy @Ketchum ! I'm reading this at 5:45 on Monday and it's an unedited beating.

 

[McGuapo]

sorry amigo ..the only way Sark gets to wash his hands of that disaster is win a national title while he's at Texas.

that was an embarrassment and Sark owns it.

Of course you can’t erase it, but imagine a world where Casey comes in and tears it up and maybe they only lose a good game to OU and finish 10-2. You don’t think that will be spun as the Arkansas game is in the rear view mirror as more of an aberration because it’s been a different team ever since? That’s exactly how the narrative will be framed whether you like it or not.

 

[Big Stoop]

It means he was woefully wrong about the single biggest decision he's had to make as head coach thus far. It's a criminal indictment, especially since he gave some of Thompson's reps during August to Wright.

The OL has a lot to do with the lack of QB play. Look what Shane did at SMU with a better relative OL.

 

[sbmartin2]

I don’t disagree with going with Thompson, but man I don’t know how anyone who watched that game the other night thinks him alone is going be a savior. Thompson can absolutely be better than Card, but we have to be much better in some other areas for that to matter, especially the o-line play. I’m intrigued to see if he unlocks something different in the offense play calling wise, but I just don’t know what to expect.

 

[TurfHorn]

All I know is that @TurfHorn should not have been the first one to read this. You gotta get someone to read your copy @Ketchum ! I'm reading this at 5:45 on Monday and it's an unedited beating.

 

[frink1951]

Of course, it's possible. I don't know that Saturday night answered the question in my mind.

I haven’t seen a quarterback look so terrified in 60 years of watching the Horns. Come on. Quit being such an incredible one-trick pony.

 

[frink1951]

Not based off of the previous six months prior to last night, no?

Wrong. Witness James Brown. And the ‘63 Horns.

 

[frink1951]

you mean less than 20 minutes for Thompson.

In three games, his touchdowns per drive record is 80 percent. I don’t care when in the games they occurred. He is quite deserving of the start. And don’t ever compare card or Thompson or anyone else to James Street. You weren’t around for his 20-0 record as a starter. He was Godhead of leaders.

 

[Coach_Bass]

1. I didn't say it would be woeful to start Thompson. That's not quite what was said.

Your response:

It means he was woefully wrong about the single biggest decision he's had to make as head coach thus far. It's a criminal indictment, especially since he gave some of Thompson's reps during August to Wright.

2. I'm not telling you Thompson didn't do enough in the last 9 months, the head coach and quarterback guru did.

Your response:

Possibly. I've simply not seen a large enough sample size.

I'm not going to argue with you about it, I simply don't think you change six months of thinking in one game.

3. I'm not making a judgment on Sark after three games. I asked others if they did.

Even asking that question after two games is crazy talk.

4. I didn't say to go after average OL targets. There were better options than that available and better ways to work the transfer market IMO.

Like who? And what is better exactly? We have brought in plenty of supposedly above average transfers only for them to not make difference. The odds of finding difference makers, especially at OL is very slim.

5. k/

Good talk.

 

[frink1951]

All I can say to that is if he does stick with Card he better be willing to ride that horse into the ground. Sure, you can trot Card back out against Rice and he'll likely look fine. He may even be okay against Texas Tech. Then we'll have TCU and OU and if Card plays anything like he did against Arkansas that may absolutely splinter the program.

This is way bigger than how Sark is perceived for selecting Card as starter early on. Everyone gets that Card is a better 7 on 7 and practice QB. I think most people still believe Hudson may ultimately be the better QB. He's just not right now and especially not given our woeful offensive line situation.

He is NO THREAT to be a plus runner. Defenses already know that. Casey can throw and he can run. The decision, at least for this year, was obvious. Gotta have a running-able QB with this crap offensive line.

 

[frink1951]

And if Casey tanks against Gary P and ou, what’s the move?

Card. It ain’t rocket science.