Practice? You talking ‘bout Practice? The last 6 months of game time have been absolutely crystal clear.
Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend: 24 Hours Later...
- Thread starter Ketchum
- Start date
I’m fairly cynical after last night to be honest. If we see anything like that again then no
Playing both QBs in first quarter and beyond is just plain stupid! Card showed he can’t get it done. That doesn’t mean he won’t ever be able to get it done.( I think he is average at best, Garrett Gilbert 2.0) But Casey should’ve been named the starter. And for Sark yesterday was strike 1 in game two. Not a great start! Although strike 1 could’ve been not bringing in transfer OL which you were right about.
I’m all in with this one…. I’ve fallen on this sword before, I just like his demeanor, and my gut feeling think he will get this turned around. I’m on the hill hoping not to die alone.
Man i
I'm not saying they're wrong based on how bad it was, but that's a FAST turn.
Man isn't that the whole issue- 95 percent of this board lost all trust for their HC after 2 games.
I'm not saying they're wrong based on how bad it was, but that's a FAST turn.
After last night? Is this a real question?
@Ketchum Cricket is awesome! We watch all the time on the dedicated sky Sports channel. I bought my wife a signed bat for her birthday.
Rules are weird but it’s fun. And this is what happens with a decade of bad UT football. You start watching cricket.
Rules are weird but it’s fun. And this is what happens with a decade of bad UT football. You start watching cricket.
It is. You can answer it any way you want.
The implications are significant if the answer is no, especially based on a game.
You guys would have run Mack out of town after his first three games, no?
That’s fair. Is there anything that can be done on the OLine? I guess insert Karic and Conner?
I don’t see where starting CT at least thru OU (see where the chips fall) and continuing to let Card grow and develop is an admission on his part he was wrong. He has openly admitted Casey needs to play and will play and the decision to not start Casey was razor thin, even if those words were just rhetoric. He can simply say the competition at every position is still ongoing and that CT has earned the right to start vs Rice..
it’s actually pretty simple, I think his team would not disagree with CT starting,would probably respect him more. They know CT and his passion and desire to put this team on his back.
I mean we don’t have to run Sark out of town to be skeptical of his future here. I still believe but if I see 1-2 more performances like this, it’s hard to say he is the right guy.
As a fan of the team, it really bothers me that any of us don’t think it should be Casey Thompson until he screws up. It makes me think we don’t want to win.
Not yet..I’m more hopeful than trusting, his resume is not Saban, Meyer or even Mack Brown.
Costner was good in Tin Cup, but better in Bull Durham. Crash Davis should be top 5 on your list.
@Ketchum B/S. Sark didn't want show too much considering we have Rice coming up this week.
It's about 2 qtrs to late...if he woul have at least rotated CT I to game early he could have given card cover and some time to collect his shit...leaving him in there for that ass kicking did nothing to further his development
Completely off topic but last night a poster created a thread about Sark and drinking. It was trash and it was deleted. Did the poster get a ban?
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
More classified material discovered at Mar-a-Lago 4 months after FBI search
- Latest: Denz Washington
-
-
Stargazing: Ranking the Top 50 head coaches in college football- Latest: CodyCarpentier
-
