ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From the Weekend (Channeling my inner Matthew... )

My irritation with this site is that you have all taken this one source's opinion and presents it as a done deal despite what you yourselves have previously written. Then you talk to your subscribers like a sage addressing the village idiot when someone dares to question it. It's arrogant and condescending . You like on by telling everyone that your thinking is the only logical way of thinking and the rest of us shouldn't date question. It's pretty poor to treat your customers line they are idiots . Especially since other websites are contradicting what you are putting out as chiseled in stone.

This times a million. Every OB member I personally know (over 10 different members who don't necessarily know each other) feel the same way. None of them respect ketch and all feel like he's condescending and arrogant.
 
Burt's position on the depth chart must be more volatile than imagined, then, considering that both Swoopes and Buechele threw to him during open practice scrimmage work last Sunday. Swoopes threw to Heard on Monday - this Monday, today - while Buechele hit Burt for a TD. Sounds like some mix-and-match to me.
correct
 
This reminds me of the "Prince is better than Mozart" debate.

Seriously, though, if we are expected to trust OB staff because they do this reporting stuff full time and have sources we do not, wouldn't it follow that OB staff should trust CS and the other coaches, who -- you know, coach football full time and have lots of sources?

I don't have a clue who will start at QB but I am sure it will be whoever the coaches believe gives them the best chance of winning.
and what we've reported is that at this point that is Swoopes.
 
This times a million. Every OB member I personally know (over 10 different members who don't necessarily know each other) feel the same way. None of them respect ketch and all feel like he's condescending and arrogant.
None respect me? Not one?

condescending and arrogance never go the other way, I suppose.
 
None respect me? Not one?

condescending and arrogance never go the other way, I suppose.

I never said they didn't go the other way. The difference is you are the owner and the supposed professional "journalist". When you speak to your customers like they are lesser than you, you open yourself up. Just my 2 cents. I don't expect you to agree or change your ways. Just stating how many of your subscribers feel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanielSucks
The idea of starting a freshman QB is just another example of white privilege. If he were any other color, we would not be having this controversy.
---signed social justice warrior
 
  • Like
Reactions: El Che Guevara
Ketch-

Doesn't all of this highlight the monumental mistake of us not going after a highly ranked JUCO QB with experience in a similar offense? Looks like the difference between 2 or 3 wins this year which is big. It would have given Sam and Shane time to be groomed and kept the defense from stacking the box.
 
I remember when this was a recruiting site. Now it's "Days of our Lives" with so much BS scripted BS by the mods with their only intention being creating more drama than there really is in the program and getting their subscribers all fired up in the hopes everyone stops noticing that there is little to no real useful information on recruiting being offered. And I'm falling for it. Shame on me.
fish rot from the head down. libs gonna lib. Just don't expect them to NOT direct the blame on ..... Bush.
 
So is it correct that both quarterbacks threw to first- and second-team receivers, or that one quarterback works exclusively with the ones and the other works exclusively with the twos? Because both of those assertions can't be correct, and only one of them is supported by video/eyes on evidence.
 
a. What about my second point. You disagree with that?
What second point? About slander, or about y'all and click bait? I haven't slandered you or your site, and I haven't expressed my opinions about click bait. Not sure what you mean here...

b. You need to trust me when I tell you the level of our sourcing on this is high. In theory, it's why you signed up. We're good at our jobs and we don't casually approach these things.

Trust is a fickle thing, and I don't give it unless it's earned. Year after year we read things on internet message boards and then we see an on field product that doesn't match that description. This damages trust. It is obviously not isolated to your site, but it certainly happens on your site. Also, your sourcing is one of the lesser reasons why I joined this site. But yes, I'm paying you for a service.

That being said, I realize that you're trying to hint at the fact that, particularly in this case, your sourcing is elite. That's fine, but as an engineer I know to never fully trust a single data point. You have no idea what frame of mind this person was in when they provided the info. You almost surely don't fully understand their motivation for sharing the info, unless you're paying them perhaps. It also could have been a relatively skewed day in terms of the QBs' performance, they (the QBs or the source) could have been short on sleep, etc. My point isn't that they're wrong; I'm saying in my experience you can almost never be 100% sure.

c. what parts do you think I believe are facts that aren't?

Based on the way you're addressing posters' comments ITT, I gather that you believe basically everything you wrote in that excerpt was factual. Your writing indicates you're using general trends as your basis, but ITT you're defending those same trends as if they were facts and shooting people down left and right without actually considering their POV.

d. Yes, our sourcing indicates that we have a clear understanding as to what is occuring with the chief decision makers on this subject. 100-percent.

If your sourcing didn't involve talking to both Strong and Gilbert about their thought process, then you and I have different definitions of 100%. If it did, then I'm surprised our HC and OC are so candid with the media, but I guess that's good?

e. You do understand most of the others on this board don't do what I do for a living and don't have access to the info the totality of our sources combined bring to the table?

Yes, do you think I'm stupid? FYI, I'm not.

f. what was the point of the Social Justice Warrior remark? Seems unneeded.

This board is a social place. You even jokingly call yourself a social justice warrior, but in this thread you're completely dismissing the opinions of others because you say you have logic, or "facts", on your side. From that I could infer that you think each of those posters - your readers - are illogical and they make things up. But I don't have to infer that you're blowing them off in a way that we both know makes them more frustrated. Is that typical social justice warrior behavior?
f. You are starting to get it.
 
seems to me you chuckled at my Sadio Mane comment last week.

Ask Arsenal fans if they think my thought about him is entertaining.

The chuckle is at the prediction of Liverpool fighting for the top spot and ManU to a lesser degree

Liverpool hasn't been relevant in forever outside of a fluke champions league run under Rafa Benitez

I guess if Leicerster City can win it than anything is possible. Maybe Texas will win the MNC this season also
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdriscoll
I suspect that if Tyrone performs as he has in the past (deer in headlights), the boos will not be directed at him -- they will be directed at Charlie and Sterling. But less at Sterling, because he doesn't know what Charlie should know. I went from thinking that Texas could go 8-4 to now thinking 6-6 is optimistic. With Swoopes as QB, or at least as starting as QB when the frosh needs the reps, tell me how we beat ND, Cal, OSU, ou, TCU, and yes, even Tech on the road. With a suspect O-line and D-line, and dinged top 2 RBs? Yes, the backups are solid, but how are they going to beat gang tackles? I'm waiting...

We'll see. Then again, I could be wrong.

Hook 'em!!!
 
I suspect that if Tyrone performs as he has in the past (deer in headlights), the boos will not be directed at him -- they will be directed at Charlie and Sterling.

Hook 'em!!!

No offense to you directly but that's what everyone says and it's horseshit.

'I wasn't booing Little, I was booing Akers. I wasn't booing Simms or Gilbert I was booing Greg Davis and Mack'

You think if a Swoopes-led offense goes 3-out in their first possession and is greeted with a chorus of boos, he and the rest of the team will know it was meant elsewhere?
 
good+grief.png



Keep up. From the column that we're discussing and was referenced in out conversation:

The second thing that we can all agree on is that if the coaches know with absolute certainty that Shane Buechele is going to start the opener, he needs to be taking every first-team rep that his human hands can get. We’re talking about a true freshman potentially playing in his first game in prime-time on a Sunday night against a top 10 team that just happens to be the most well-known program in college football.

If he takes 1,000 reps every day, it might not be enough if 1,001 are available. I feel like we can all agree to that, right?


Anyone disagree? Ok, let’s move on.



a. You've been here since 2012. What have we had wrong about the team in the last four years because your notion that we've posted things that haven't translated to the field is pure garbage and you just talking out of your ass.

Name them. Name all of things I've missed on that has eroded trust.

Also, you have a short memory because we absolutely dominated the assistant coach hiring process.

b. You don;t know what we know, who we know and where we're getting it from.

You don't know what you're talking about and you're not listening to the people that do.



no specifics. Nothing quoted. Gotcha. I see what I'm dealing with.


You just aren't paying attention at all.


You have not proven that in this discussion.


Be better. Much better.

You can't make a post without listing points a-z about how much smarter you are than the world, so forgive me for not following one of your multiple tangents.

As for the rest of your reply, I guess I put as much detail and fact into my response as you put into all of your "analyses". Is it frustrating?

I won't be renewing my membership here for reasons exactly like this. You treat members like shit unless they kiss your ass. You worship yourself like a god, but you're just some guy hiding behind his computer like the rest of us. Only you're eating and watching soccer more.

And I'm sure you don't care. And my $100/yr is just a pinprick. But you won't see it again.

At the end of the day, you can insult your patrons all you want. But you aren't as smart as you think, and many of them are much smarter than you think. So sometimes, you should try to listen to them instead of being a dick. Because it will cost you again.

My last piece of advice that you wont take... Invest in like 10 editors for you and Anwar. Holy hell you guys need it.
 
People are way overthinking this QB thing. The guy that can throw the ball downfield to open receivers, will play. As far as I've seen, that guy is Shane Buechele -

He rest of this is semi interesting banter at best.
 
I never said they didn't go the other way. The difference is you are the owner and the supposed professional "journalist". When you speak to your customers like they are lesser than you, you open yourself up. Just my 2 cents. I don't expect you to agree or change your ways. Just stating how many of your subscribers feel.
Isn't the use of the word "supposed" the exact kind of treatment towards me that you're speaking of.

You can see how one might view that irony, right?
 
The idea of starting a freshman QB is just another example of white privilege. If he were any other color, we would not be having this controversy.
---signed social justice warrior
weirdest post in the thread.
 
So is it correct that both quarterbacks threw to first- and second-team receivers, or that one quarterback works exclusively with the ones and the other works exclusively with the twos? Because both of those assertions can't be correct, and only one of them is supported by video/eyes on evidence.
When one works with the ones, the other works with the 2s, and vice versa.
 
You can't make a post without listing points a-z about how much smarter you are than the world, so forgive me for not following one of your multiple tangents.

As for the rest of your reply, I guess I put as much detail and fact into my response as you put into all of your "analyses". Is it frustrating?

I won't be renewing my membership here for reasons exactly like this. You treat members like shit unless they kiss your ass. You worship yourself like a god, but you're just some guy hiding behind his computer like the rest of us. Only you're eating and watching soccer more.

And I'm sure you don't care. And my $100/yr is just a pinprick. But you won't see it again.

At the end of the day, you can insult your patrons all you want. But you aren't as smart as you think, and many of them are much smarter than you think. So sometimes, you should try to listen to them instead of being a dick. Because it will cost you again.

My last piece of advice that you wont take... Invest in like 10 editors for you and Anwar. Holy hell you guys need it.
You didn't address any of the post. That's my issue. You make claims without supporting evidence and when I ask you to list the evidence, you turn away from that conversation and tell me that I'm out of line and being rude.

I don't need you to kiss my ass. I need you to be less rude when you're confronted by a discussion that sees you take wild swings.
 
People are way overthinking this QB thing. The guy that can throw the ball downfield to open receivers, will play. As far as I've seen, that guy is Shane Buechele -

He rest of this is semi interesting banter at best.
I'm not sure that's thing that matters the most to Strong.
 
White privilege.
well, it's not an accident that some of the people that really take nasty little digs are motivated by social matters they think I'm way off on.

They just won't come out and say that that's the real issue.
 
Me be less rude? Yeah, try the mirror first. You're an A hole on here sometimes and you blind yourself to it. And one of my biggest problems with this site is your definitions of evidence.

Only Alex and Dustin really provide objective analysis on a consistent basis. Otherwise, yall are just journalists with uncited sources and bad proofreading.

Ultimately, once I decided I'm fed up with your shit, I decided it made no sense to dig up evidence. So go pound sand.

Bro, relax. Some of you guys truly need a hobby...Or a job...or something...
 
The chuckle is at the prediction of Liverpool fighting for the top spot and ManU to a lesser degree

Liverpool hasn't been relevant in forever outside of a fluke champions league run under Rafa Benitez

besides the champions league run They almost won the league a few years ago. I don't see them competing for the top spot the year as that is unrealistic to expect, but I've seen several predictions of "Top 4", and wouldn't be surprised if they managed that. They have their best manager in a very long time who seems keen on being around for awhile and really building a team. They are on the way up.
 
besides the champions league run They almost won the league a few years ago. I don't see them competing for the top spot the year as that is unrealistic to expect, but I've seen several predictions of "Top 4", and wouldn't be surprised if they managed that. They have their best manager in a very long time who seems keen on being around for awhile and really building a team. They are on the way up.
In Klopp, I trust.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT