At the end of the day, I think the bigger root issue is that too many people begrudge the players for making money.
Interesting. Not me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At the end of the day, I think the bigger root issue is that too many people begrudge the players for making money.
That’s definitely one element. However, I think there are other fundamental issues that have many questioning wtf is going on. Also, when you consider that the organization and coaches have all the control and are ultimately responsible for the product, it makes sense the money would also be in house. Otherwise you have a base of people funding the most important piece of your product but have no knowledge of what is really necessary and how and why it’s used, nor do they have any control over the outcomes. Fans are just too disconnected from the reality and the process but are expected to be the stewards. Doesn’t make sense. I pay my employees because I’m the one with my fingers on the pulse and all the controls and decision making and ultimately being my ass on the line.At the end of the day, I think the bigger root issue is that too many people begrudge the players for making money.
I thought it was Top 30-40 good.
That’s short sighted. You’re describing a scenario where the whole market is due to correct. Now they might have a little more but they’ll be making choices at that time too and not just having a blank check book.It's not a problem for A&M.
Exactly my point!!At the end of the day, this NIL thing is a market just like anything else. It will balance out eventually and when it does I have full faith that Texas will be in the top 3 spots whenever that is. Especially if we keep winning.
They’re the thirstiest kids on the block, by a mile. They aren’t really a good example, except for the fact that they are our closest rival, so it’s easy to point and say “aggy is doing it”. Well yeah, you knew they would. Like saying hey a crazy person is doing something crazy! Yeah, that’s what they do. Doesn’t mean it’s good or sustainable.That’s short sighted. You’re describing a scenario where the whole market is due to correct. Now they might have a little more but they’ll be making choices at that time too and not just having a blank check book.
They’re the thirstiest kids on the block, by a mile. They aren’t really a good example, except for the fact that they are our closest rival, so it’s easy to point and say “aggy is doing it”. Well yeah, you knew they would. Like saying hey a crazy person is doing something crazy! Yeah, that’s what they do.
It’s not built for long term success as currently constructed. JMO. I’m just not seeing it, but I’m a huckleberry for the moment.It's interesting. I mean I work in financial markets and I have seen this a million times. What's the externality that would drive consistent over the top giving? Aggieness? Actually maybe.
In cycling jumbo visma just won the triple. It's never ever been done before (giro tour and vuelta) so what happens? Their title sponsor drops them and they are having to combine with another team that has been historically great but lost their sugar daddy
Honestly this is like Texas winning the Natty and half the fans stop giving anything. It's more than that.
I can't figure any of this out
Wait until this recession hits. Shits gonna change for sure. Why don’t they just ask to add 1, 2, or 3 $ to every beer you buy on game days? If people knew that they’d do it instantly.They’re the thirstiest kids on the block, by a mile. They aren’t really a good example, except for the fact that they are our closest rival, so it’s easy to point and say “aggy is doing it”. Well yeah, you knew they would. Like saying hey a crazy person is doing something crazy! Yeah, that’s what they do. Doesn’t mean it’s good or sustainable.
Well when you put your balls in the hands of others, you’re subject to any of the feelings and whims of the person holding them.Wait until this recession hits. Shits gonna change for sure. Why don’t they just ask to add 1, 2, or 3 $ to every beer you buy on game days? If people knew that they’d do it instantly.
According to KetchumAdonai Mitchell didn't just come to Texas to be close to family. Xavier Worthy isn't still on campus because he loves Zilker Park. T'Vondre Sweat didn't come back to Texas for another season when the NFL was calling because he liked playing for free so much that he thought he would do it for one more season.
According to Sarkisian.On how you keep guys in the program and stick to development in today's day and age ... first, it starts with their relationships. He tries to be a hands-on coach, tries to have a really good connection with the players. At the end of the day, wherever you are on the depth chart, they're trying to get everybody better every day. Trying to develop them as players, as students, as a person. Players appreciate that. Ultimately they've created a culture that guys like to be part of.
It’s a bit of a hush hush nebulous thing, as mentioned earlier, and Sarks comments kind of reflect that, which is one element of the disconnect.According to Ketchum
According to Sarkisian.
See ketch, it AIN'T ABOUT THE BENJAMINS!
Not sticking up for Curt schilling just calling a spade a spade. How old are you dude seriously? Name calling, lol. You must of had a hard time in school with the thin skin you have.Says the guy calling people names... and... sticking up for.... *checks his notes*... Curt Schilling...
or alumni care about sports outside of squash and croquet.A lot of schools have huge money. That doesn't mean its invested in NIL.
shirley you mean Hogan's Heroes.How is Kelley’s Heroes not on your ww2 movie list? What kind of shenanigans is this?
That’s definitely one element. However, I think there are other fundamental issues that have many questioning wtf is going on. Also, when you consider that the organization and coaches have all the control and are ultimately responsible for the product, it makes sense the money would also be in house. Otherwise you have a base of people funding the most important piece of your product but have no knowledge of what is really necessary and how and why it’s used, nor do they have any control over the outcomes. Fans are just too disconnected from the reality and the process but are expected to be the stewards. Doesn’t make sense. I pay my employees because I’m the one with my fingers on the pulse and all the controls and decision making and ultimately being my ass on the line.
Of course. Sark can't talk about his program like a grifter. I was teasing Ketchum.It’s a bit of a hush hush nebulous thing, as mentioned earlier, and Sarks comments kind of reflect that, which is one element of the disconnect.
Our legacy model involved very wealthy donors making large donations to the Longhorn Foundation and then wielding influence, there was nothing that qualified them for the most part to be making football decisions. While NIL for football has a lot of warts, specific to Texas, the system has allowed the experts to start driving the bus with much less distraction and interference and I think from what you have seen on the field this year, it is obvious it is definitely not fan directed.
When a persons gives to Texas One Fund, my belief is they just want to win and be good at football, you don't expect access or benefits because at the end of the day, all I can really sell is winning.
Wait until this recession hits. Shits gonna change for sure. Why don’t they just ask to add 1, 2, or 3 $ to every beer you buy on game days? If people knew that they’d do it instantly.
Sodexho gave some bullshit excuse why they couldn't execute a round up program in the stadium.This makes a lot of sense if they can work it legally
I get all that, for sure. Just not sure it’s resonating the way it should, or that it’s sustainable as it is now. I certainly don’t think the fans should have influence over the decisions, that’s kind of my point. Even if we are only discussing perception, perception is sometimes everything when you’re telling people it’s their responsibility and the pay off is winning, which is largely controlled by other things and decisions that are made by others.Our legacy model involved very wealthy donors making large donations to the Longhorn Foundation and then wielding influence, there was nothing that qualified them for the most part to be making football decisions. While NIL for football has a lot of warts, specific to Texas, the system has allowed the experts to start driving the bus with much less distraction and interference and I think from what you have seen on the field this year, it is obvious it is definitely not fan directed.
When a persons gives to Texas One Fund, my belief is they just want to win and be good at football, you don't expect access or benefits because at the end of the day, all I can really sell is winning.
According to Ketchum
According to Sarkisian.
See ketch, it AIN'T ABOUT THE BENJAMINS!
That's fair.It’s a bit of a hush hush nebulous thing, as mentioned earlier, and Sarks comments kind of reflect that, which is one element of the disconnect.
Not sticking up for Curt schilling just calling a spade a spade. How old are you dude seriously? Name calling, lol. You must of had a hard time in school with the thin skin you have.
TicketCity Becomes Corporate Sponsor of Texas One Fund
TicketCity Supports Texas One Fund I was a student-athlete my first year in college so I can relate to the huge commitment these young men and ladies make. We are excited to do our part to support them on their journey...”— Randy Cohen, Founder of TicketCityAUSTIN, TEXAS, UNITED STATES OF...www.kxan.com