Great post, thanks.It would be nice if the mods supported a bit more nuance around here. The "worst coach ever" thing draws battelines right away and is very youtube-comments like, adding a lot of heat with no light.
Strong de-pussified the locker room when it was sorely needed, brought a standard of basic human decency along with a willingness (very much unlike his peers) to enforce it even when it hurt him, is an elite talent evaluator, and is a really good (maybe even great) defensive mind. As Scipio notes here we'll ultimately be glad that Strong was the coach here and Strong will very likely leave the program in a better state than he found it. None of that belies the basic facts (also noted in Scipio's comment) that a) Strong is failing miserably at the executive management tasks of his job, and b) it remains incomprehensible what this defensive staff was doing in the offseason but it's clear they weren't teaching football. That b) happened at all is bad enough at $5M per year; that it happened on Strong's side of the ball is even worse.
Focusing on win totals (6-6 vs 7-5 vs 8-4) is a rhetorical trap that obscures these basic process failures that by their very nature put a ceiling on this team's performance. *That's* the conversation that needs to be had and we'd likely all be a lot less grumpy with each other if we had any collective sense that the leadership of this school was in a position to have it. To Ketch's credit, he's been calling out for a while the dangers of a placeholder AD, and we're seeing those dangers come to fruition. But as we prepare to say goodbye to our head coach (this year, next year, whatever; the ceiling is there), can we at least acknowledge the good even as we call out the bad?
If Ketch and anyone else saying CS is the worst coach would take a look at the 2017 two-deep, they might realize how stupid they are. CS rebuilt the program for whoever is coaching in 2017, and he did it after coming in late and having to deal with Patterson's chicken shit.