"effort"I have tried like to hell to forget about our 2017 recruiting "effort."
Yeah....
"effort"I have tried like to hell to forget about our 2017 recruiting "effort."
I don’t even know how that works anymore with counting back and such. Thanks for clarifying.No, because the team is working with the 25-limit, not the 85-man limit when it comes to transfers.
* Speaking of track times I'm dying to see, put new 2023 commit Reuben Owens II in that category, especially when you consider that he ran an 11.71 this weekend at the Needville Relays (also long jumped 20-7 and tripled jumped 42-2). When you look at his film, he's on a completely different level than all of the kids he's playing against. In fact, his film is so absurd at times that it's tough to quantify exactly what we're seeing when it comes to raw explosiveness. I'm just curious about what level of freak we're talking about. Back in the day, Adrian Peterson popped off a 10.33 in the Class 4A 100 Meter final as a junior. Reggie Bush was a 10.43 guy (fastest in California at the time). I don't know what my expectations are for Owens, but I'd certainly like to see him run better by the end of the year than 11.71.
It's not that they are laying poorly, it's that they aren't performing above-average consistently together.
They keep having moments of brilliance, followed by shit within minutes of each other.
Yet, that's the Tournament and with all due respect to games like the one that was played yesterday... it doesn't really matter at this point in the season. The Longhorns can win the final three games of this season and then win the conference tournament, but if it loses in the second round of the Big Dance, the season will be a failure.
Likewise, if it loses its final three games and flames out quickly in the Big 12 Tournament, but then finds a way to make it to the Sweet 16, all the bitching and complaining from this week (and other weeks) won’t matter much.
It gets dizzying at times.I don’t even know how that works anymore with counting back and such. Thanks for clarifying.
(Sell) But, a dreaded 5 vs. 12 type of match-up looms and unless the Texas guards get it together soon, I might change my mind.
I just don't know that winning two games is catching fire. It'll likely come down to who is in the bracket.Perhaps to some extent. The reality is Shaka's program doesn't exactly give me confidence that they would all of a sudden "catch fire" once the Tournament hit.
well, yeah.... but we're at a point in the season where we have a very good idea of where the team WILL be seeded.This is why the "regular season doesn't count crowd" strikes me as misguided. They just don't pull names out of a hat come seeding time. You would the best seed possible and that comes with the best regular season you can fashion.
... Cade Cunningham did the damn thing in Norman on Saturday with a 40-point monster. The two teams play again on Monday, and it feels like must-watch stuff.
do you think anyone was surprised?Cade Cunningham is what happens when a frosh has a legitimately ELITE skillset. Not just elite athleticism. What he's doing isn't the least surprising for people who have been paying attention for the last 2 years.
Spots opening up isn't a huge issue IMO.
Texas being closer to 75 scholarships when the season starts than 85 is potentially a very real thing.
I just don't know that winning two games is catching fire. It'll likely come down to who is in the bracket.
Hell, Penders' last sweet 16 had everything to do with the bracket falling the right way once Coppin State did what it did in the first round.
Sark is going to have 25 for 2022 without even trying."Potentially?" There is no "potentially" about it. The more schollies Sark has the better for '22.
Is Texas playing like a drunken bum in losing closely on the road in Lubbock, by 2 at home to West Virginia and by seven on the road in Stillwater?It is when you come in stumbling like a drunken bum.
do you think anyone was surprised?
Let's take a look at the team's resume for a second.
Wins
vs. North Carolina
at Oklahoma State
at No.17 Kansas
at No.10 West Virginia
vs. No.17 Kansas
Losses
4 point loss to No.8 Villanova
2 point loss to No.18 Texas Tech
1 point loss to No.7 Oklahoma
14-point loss to No.2 Baylor
8-point loss at Oklahoma State
2-point loss to West Virginia
9-point loss at No.18 Texas Tech
well, how many times has he dropped a 40-burger in Bedlam?Pretty sure a lot of OBers didn't quite understand what Okie Lite was getting. FWIW, not saying you were surprised, but exactly how many times prior have you even bothered to discuss Cunningham?
well, how many times has he dropped a 40-burger in Bedlam?
He's a projected No.1 overall player in the Draft, so anyone paying attention knew he was sick. I can't really speak for anyone that just didn't give a shit to know that basic point.
Timing is everything. If it had happened midweek, it likely doesn't get mentioned.
Dak over Wilson if he comes back healthy.A 32-year old player starting to enter a bit of a natural decline for a 27-year old player entering his prime is a no-brainer?
Agreed. Against the best competition on the recent schedule, Texas has more often been on the slightly not good enough place against Sweet 16 or better level teams.That's a pretty front-loaded resume. A not so small detail.
He's no Michael Beasley.I mean, he's only averaging 20/6/3.5 and is going to be the Big 12 POY and probably at least 2nd team AA.
Agreed. Against the best competition on the recent schedule, Texas has more often been on the slightly not good enough place against Sweet 16 or better level teams.
I think it becomes truly problematic when combined with recent seasons, but this season's team can't control what happened in the last decade.
I just don't think they are playing the kind of basketball that warrants being compared to previous seasons, but that still might not translate to Tournament success.
The back-court failings in crunch time have been the most problematic issue for me in the last couple of weeks.The tournament exposes precisely a team's biggest flaws. And we have several fatal flaws that not surprisingly show up too often against better teams.
No. That was during the time I was living in LA. 2004 was a long time ago though (as much as I hate to admit it). So long ago........Lance Armstrong still hadn't won the last of this Tour de Forces, the Red Sox still hadn't lifted the Curse of the Bambino, Osama Bin Laden was still the leader of Al Qaeda, Rosa Parks & Christopher Reeves were alive, and Maalik Murphy was 6 months old.were you at the game in 2004?
... And when they do, I'll be absolutely effin thrilled! Until then, we'll continue to have DB's that have to cover all day, RB's that have to make their own holes, WR's who don't have time to get open, and QB's who spend most of their time playing ineffectively through injuries.Actually, recruiting and landing special quarterback prospects is a big deal.
Texas has exactly one national top 100 level quarterback outside of Jerrod Heard in the last 13 recruiting classes.
The linemen will come, especially on the offensive side of the ball.
Well, they were out of their ****ing minds in 2004. Not Ohio State-like, but not far away.No. That was during the time I was living in LA. 2004 was a long time ago though (as much as I hate to admit it). So long ago........Lance Armstrong still hadn't won the last of this Tour de Forces, the Red Sox still hadn't lifted the Curse of the Bambino, Osama Bin Laden was still the leader of Al Qaeda, Rosa Parks & Christopher Reeves were alive, and Maalik Murphy was 6 months old.![]()
Are you somehow of the position that I am debating you on the importance of OL/DL recruiting?... And when they do, I'll be absolutely effin thrilled! Until then, we'll continue to have DB's that have to cover all day, RB's that have to make their own holes, WR's who don't have time to get open, and QB's who spend most of their time playing ineffectively through injuries.
Nobody will remember Jerrod Heard outside of one stellar game against Cal. You know the answer to this question and I don't, but how good was the OL in front of him in 2015? I'm guessing it wasn't great. How much upside would he have had if he had four 4* and a 5* O-lineman in front of him?
BTW, haven't we landed special QB's the last three years? Or am I overstating signing Card, Jackson, Thompson and Rising?Actually, recruiting and landing special quarterback prospects is a big deal.
Texas has exactly one national top 100 level quarterback outside of Jerrod Heard in the last 13 recruiting classes.
The linemen will come, especially on the offensive side of the ball.
Are you somehow of the position that I am debating you on the importance of OL/DL recruiting?
Potentially, but the stats you provided about the receiver rankings throughout the years was rough to read.I think the Rivals rankings at the top get it right more than NFL people get the Draft right, at least if we're talking about success rates.
I viewed Card as special. The national services did not.BTW, haven't we landed special QB's the last three years? Or am I overstating signing Card, Jackson, Thompson and Rising?
Don't get me wrong, I'd rather have Murphy than NOT have him.
But I'm old fashioned in that I believe 4* Lineman turn 3* skill players into superstars, and not the other way around.
It's the WORST producing position of them all, along with linebackers.Potentially, but the stats you provided about the receiver rankings throughout the years was rough to read.