I shouted out "free the Expo 67"
Til they stepped on my head
And told me I was fat.
Now I'm very big, I'm a big important man
But the only thing that's different
Is underneath my hat.
I shouted out "free the Expo 67"
absolutely. I have sensed from some admin that they know a Texas move will change the landscape of the entire sport.
I think with ESPN not in a position to bail out the Big 12 moving forward, the safety net is pretty much gone.IF Texas & OU stay do you think the B12 survives as a P5 or do you think they will be forced to move into a P4 scenario ?
.
Yes and no. I don't think the talent in TX is any less, but with teams like Baylor getting a few good runs, it made adding lesser players into more system friendly programs a trend.Do you not perceive the landscape different than itwas a decade ago?They should for many reasons but to say players' aren't getting drafted do to being in the Big 12 is weak. Didn't stop all those picks from 1998-2008. League has one good team. That's why there are few picks . OU is one of only 2 schools with at least 4 players drafted the past 10 years . UT will be there next draft. I bet there are at least 10picks the next 2 seasons.
I would say that it doesn't say a thing considering a whole lot of Texas High School talent went out of state to other conferences to play their college ball. Alabama and Ohio State to name just a couple.3
And what does this (the lack of respect for the Big 12) say about Texas high school talent, which we have always thought of as the best in the nation?
The state doesn't quite produce in enough volume for its rep.I would say that it doesn't say a thing considering a whole lot of Texas High School talent went out of state to other conferences to play their college ball. Alabama and Ohio State to name just a couple.
I disagree.The state doesn't quite produce in enough volume for its rep.
So you were bullied and did not commit suicide?I shouted out "free the Expo 67"
Til they stepped on my head
And told me I was fat.
I think he would prefer to be called a warlock.BUY or SELL: The Anwar Richardson Texas curse is real?
(Sell) I reserve the right to change my mind. One more season of sub-.500 play and I’m going to be of the opinion that there are no accidents in life, which means he’s a witch and we all need to be very careful about our next steps.
I go back and forth.
I was speaking of this draft.I disagree.
Looking at the 2016 opening day rosters:
1) Florida - 193 players
2) California - 187 players
3) Texas - 160 players
4) Georgia - 97 players
5) Ohio - 80 players
6) Pennsylvania - 66 players
7) Louisiana - 63 players
Source: Cleveland.com
Looks like Texas is right where most people would expect.
the question was merely about my preference in a league.trophies2 said: ↑
What say you?
I'd be fine with that if OU was coming with.
So are you saying that it may be ok to head to the B1G with OU or the B1G without OU? I don't see a viable path forward not involving OU unless it is the SEC - otherwise we're isolated from our two historical rivals.
Chinese people were fighting in the parkSo you were bullied and did not commit suicide?
You said that the state (of Texas) doesn't quite produce in enough volume for its rep.I was speaking of this draft.
I'll help. Wyoming had more players drafted than Texas. Wyoming.
Fair enough.You said that the state (of Texas) doesn't quite produce in enough volume for its rep.
That reads as a general statement about the condition of things, not as a reflection on a single draft. If you are saying it didn't produce the volume this year as its rep, then fine. But in general it's still ranks at the top in generating NFL talent, and I don't think that is going to change.
The state had less this year than it historically does, but it's only one year away from having more players drafted than any other. You can't make a broad difinitive statement based off of either year. But our society has the collective attention span of a gnat, which leads to the posts questioning why the state of Texas can't produce NFL talent anymore.
Well if you think about it, it really comes down to the Texas/OU game with whoever wins that game. Just like it the way it used to be anyway. Maybe the conference championship game will bolster that, or screw it up. But really how many 2 loss teams make it to the CFP anyway?Texas and Oklahoma are likely going to have very little margin of error moving forward. Not sure they'll be getting a ton of benefit of the doubt,
It'll be a four-game sweep. Forget I ever said it.Solid call thus far on Tucker/James. King James struggling with 35 points.
I'm back and forth too but can only consider the B1G with OU in tow. I get the issues with the SEC, but it is an athletic conference, not an academic one. If we can win without major cheating then we need to go SEC IMO.the question was merely about my preference in a league.
It baffles me that people fail to realize Texas is one of the big 12s biggest problems
The Big 10 is the favorite at the moment.I've read comments about the demise of the B12.
Any comment on which conference could be potentials for Texas?
The Big 10 is the favorite at the moment.
I could see 16.Will they take OU?
Will it be 20 teams? 16? 18?
Probably. Media creates perception. Propaganda works.I haven't seen anybody mention Mel Kiper's comment when D'Onta was drafted by the Texans. He basically said the 2K rushing yards were not real because he did it against Big 12 Defenses. I know Kiper is a bit of a blow hard talking head that just has to have some provocative BS lined up for the draft telecast, but I still found this comment surprisingly negative about the B12. Is this really what the rest of the world thinks ... that all offensive production in the Big 12 is suspect?
Oh, come on. In his biggest games, he was often playing against wretched defenses.That's not perception, that's what happened.Probably. Media creates perception. Propaganda works.
I would respond that he did it on a team with almost no other options, so it should count a bit more.
"No one wants to build a mansion in a trailer park and that’s exactly the position in which Texas finds itself." That's a succinct summary of how the dying B12 is holding our program back.
correct ^^^^^^^Sorry, but what's held our program "back" has, IMO, had little to nothing to do with the conference and overwhelmingly due to horrendous leadership from the AD's office which led to 4 years of "rolling out like a lamb" under Mack then just a bizarre 3 year odyssey with Strong. Rest assured, once Herman starts kicking ass then the whole "let's blame the Big 12" will go away.
Your post is exactly right, except for one thing.Sorry, but what's held our program "back" has, IMO, had little to nothing to do with the conference and overwhelmingly due to horrendous leadership from the AD's office which led to 4 years of "rolling out like a lamb" under Mack then just a bizarre 3 year odyssey with Strong. Rest assured, once Herman starts kicking ass then the whole "let's blame the Big 12" will go away.
Oh, come on. In his biggest games, he was often playing against wretched defenses.That's not perception, that's what happened.