ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend (The truth may hurt, but it's the truth)

How much is "race" being used in negative recruiting against us? The Eyes of Texas, professors at Texas refusing to let it go, the band refusing to play the song, the march and demands by the players last year, students refusing to work for UT. Even Earl Campbell and Ricky Williams thinking there are racial undertones and we should do away with the song. These are all things that occured that the current staff is probably having to deal with that is making it more challenging to attract African-American athletes. Is this what has killed the momentum in recruiting that we had earlier this year? Is this why we struggled with the portal? Other schools are probably using this against us and it may be working. Especially at places like Oregon.
Not as much as being a constant disappointment on the field. Seriously, I understand wy you would ask, but it hasn't been coming up.
 
Isn’t this the cart before the horse scenario? If you don’t have the players you can’t win big. If you don’t win big, you can’t get the players. If the current O line isn’t good enough, or the QB situation is too green, or the WR Corp not good enough-yet, how do they get to 10 wins, including a win over OU.? I think that’s asking too much of the staff in the first year. If they can’t get the elite players at that position your asking TX to do something I don’t even think Mack was able to accomplish. Where is the allegiance to the University? What happened to going to a school because it’s a great opportunity? Do these players think they won’t get exposure at Texas to showcase their abilities to the NFL? That makes no sense, at least to me, but I’m just an old guy. I think everyone is getting tired of anticipating good news and being disappointed with bad news. It’s human nature, it’s reality. Sark is going to have to do something historically that TX hasn’t been able to do- win with less talented players. Iowa State did it, K State has done it, TCU occasionally has done it(especially against Texas). I really like Sark and his staff,. They must be thinking TX/we shouldn’t be having these problems getting elite players to buy in.
Elite coaching + very, very good quarterback play = something we haven't seen in a long time.

This is what Sark was hired to fix.
 
@Ketchum from the athletic today


Related: Elite 11 daily tracker

1. The most impressive quarterback was from Texas, but for at least this week, it wasn’t Quinn Ewers, the player who has the rare perfect ranking from 247Sports. Ewers was excellent overall, but the guy who I thought outshined him was Cade Klubnik, a Clemson commit from powerhouse Austin Westlake. The wiry 6-foot-2, 185-pounder, ranked as 247Sports’ No. 6 QB entering the event but likely is headed for a better ranking soon. He was the MVP selected by the Elite 11 coaches and led his team to the seven-on-seven tournament championship. His accuracy sparkled each day. He showed he could throw very well on the move, and he seemed dialed in throughout the event, which separated him from most of the other top guys who flashed at times but weren’t as consistently sharp.




Clemson, which is in the midst of quite a run of gifted quarterbacks, has another terrific one on the way. From talking to coaches about Klubnik and from observing him the past few days, it feels like the bust factor — the chance that he won’t come close to the hype — is going to be very low. I’ll be really, really surprised if he doesn’t have an excellent college career


7. The guy everyone seemed to be most split on was Texas commit Maalik Murphy. He struggled Friday in seven-on-seven, and he knew it. I was around him when he discussed it with one of the Elite 11 coaches, and Murphy handled that exceptionally well. He came across as sincere and accountable, focused on trying to get better. Not making excuses or being obtuse.

Murphy, at 6-5 and 230 pounds, has a huge frame and big arm; if you told me he was 6-5, 245, it wouldn’t surprise me. He’s engaging and fun to be around. The guys I spoke to think he’s very coachable. He was inconsistent this week, but keep in mind, he has started only six high school games, and as one of the other Elite 11 QBs told me the other night, Murphy just turned 17 recently and is one of the youngest quarterbacks at the event. It’ll be fascinating to watch his development.

Murphy plays with real confidence in his ability to make throws into tight windows, and he displayed that several times. That’s something a lot of young quarterbacks shy away from in settings like this one. His attitude indicates he’s going to embrace getting better in the detail work and the finer nuances of the position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CutaneousHorn
@Ketchum from the athletic today


Related: Elite 11 daily tracker

1. The most impressive quarterback was from Texas, but for at least this week, it wasn’t Quinn Ewers, the player who has the rare perfect ranking from 247Sports. Ewers was excellent overall, but the guy who I thought outshined him was Cade Klubnik, a Clemson commit from powerhouse Austin Westlake. The wiry 6-foot-2, 185-pounder, ranked as 247Sports’ No. 6 QB entering the event but likely is headed for a better ranking soon. He was the MVP selected by the Elite 11 coaches and led his team to the seven-on-seven tournament championship. His accuracy sparkled each day. He showed he could throw very well on the move, and he seemed dialed in throughout the event, which separated him from most of the other top guys who flashed at times but weren’t as consistently sharp.




Clemson, which is in the midst of quite a run of gifted quarterbacks, has another terrific one on the way. From talking to coaches about Klubnik and from observing him the past few days, it feels like the bust factor — the chance that he won’t come close to the hype — is going to be very low. I’ll be really, really surprised if he doesn’t have an excellent college career


7. The guy everyone seemed to be most split on was Texas commit Maalik Murphy. He struggled Friday in seven-on-seven, and he knew it. I was around him when he discussed it with one of the Elite 11 coaches, and Murphy handled that exceptionally well. He came across as sincere and accountable, focused on trying to get better. Not making excuses or being obtuse.

Murphy, at 6-5 and 230 pounds, has a huge frame and big arm; if you told me he was 6-5, 245, it wouldn’t surprise me. He’s engaging and fun to be around. The guys I spoke to think he’s very coachable. He was inconsistent this week, but keep in mind, he has started only six high school games, and as one of the other Elite 11 QBs told me the other night, Murphy just turned 17 recently and is one of the youngest quarterbacks at the event. It’ll be fascinating to watch his development.

Murphy plays with real confidence in his ability to make throws into tight windows, and he displayed that several times. That’s something a lot of young quarterbacks shy away from in settings like this one. His attitude indicates he’s going to embrace getting better in the detail work and the finer nuances of the position.
Murphy was one if the top 3 quarterbacks in 2 of the days... struggled some in the other,
 
  • Like
Reactions: DKinnamon
From 2002-15, here's a look at the performance breakdown of each of the top four rankings tiers in the Rivals.com rankings system with regards to players being drafted in the NFL.

* 46.3% (25 of 54) of five-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams:
* 34.2% (28 of 82) of high-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 23.0% (26 of 113) of mid-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 14.7% (50 of 341) of low four-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams.

From 2002-15, here's a look at the performance breakdown of each of the top four rankings tiers in the Rivals.com rankings system with regards to players from the state of Texas being drafted in the NFL.

* 22.2% (2 of 9) of five-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams:
* 35.7% (5 of 14) of high-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 6.7% (1 of 15) of mid-four star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams
* 21.1% (8 of 38) of low four-star offensive line prospects were drafted by NFL teams.
These numbers don’t convince me that high OL rankings matter.

If you add up the numbers for those top four rankings, it only amounts to just above a 20% chance of being drafted. It actually tells me that OL player development is more important.

This might explain why Walker Little (five star) and Sam Cosmi (three-star) we’re pretty much drafted in same spot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xarmygetover
These numbers don’t convince me that high OL rankings matter.

If you add up the numbers for those top four rankings, it only amounts to just above a 20% chance of being drafted. It actually tells me that OL player development is more important.

This might explain why Walker Little (five star) and Sam Cosmi (three-star) we’re pretty much drafted in same spot.
You don't measure it by adding those four together,

As is the case with all positions, the top twi tiers matter... the ones below it don't.
 
Lots of negativity and I get why. But everyone has Iowa State in the Big 12 Championship game as well as preseason top 10. Check my math but I don't remember ISU putting together a string of top 5 recruiting classes to get to this point.

I'm not saying recruiting doesn't matter. But after Strong and Herman, I'm putting much more emphasis on development than our class ranking.

We are worried about our opener against Louisiana. Where have those guys finished in recruiting the last 5 years?

I will say that I'm very happy to be reading about OL recruiting for a change instead of skill position. Outside of QB, nothing matters more.

I just wish the commitment of Maalik translated to the windfall of OL recruits the way some people thought it would have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevenspaul1357
You don't measure it by adding those four together,

As is the case with all positions, the top twi tiers matter... the ones below it don't.
Genuine question, not being a smart ass, why not?

Also, if the numbers worsen for Longhorn players, doesn’t that tell you player development is a problem?
 
Lots of negativity and I get why. But everyone has Iowa State in the Big 12 Championship game as well as preseason top 10. Check my math but I don't remember ISU putting together a string of top 5 recruiting classes to get to this point.

I'm not saying recruiting doesn't matter. But after Strong and Herman, I'm putting much more emphasis on development than our class ranking.

We are worried about our opener against Louisiana. Where have those guys finished in recruiting the last 5 years?

I will say that I'm very happy to be reading about OL recruiting for a change instead of skill position. Outside of QB, nothing matters more.

I just wish the commitment of Maalik translated to the windfall of OL recruits the way some people thought it would have.
Iowa State brings back 20+ starters and didn't lose anyone of note. It's basically the most veteran team in the history of the league.
 
Genuine question, not being a smart ass, why not?

Also, if the numbers worsen for Longhorn players, doesn’t that tell you player development is a problem?
a. Because they aren't the same thing. A national top 150 player is nothing more than a glorified national top 600 player.

b. Of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DKinnamon
Yesterday was a kick in the ding-ding. Gonna have to channel Al Davis and “just win baby.”
 
a. Because they aren't the same thing. A national top 150 player is nothing more than a glorified national top 600 player.

b. Of course.
I’m viewing it from the perspective of the player, regardless of their ranking, who all have the same goal which is to get drafted. And I’m not so sure their ranking (in of itself) gets them drafted, but rather their hard work and development.

Just my belief, I guess. Especially since even the top player ranking barely gets decent casino betting odds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SmilinJack
I’m viewing it from the perspective of the player, regardless of their ranking, who all have the same goal which is to get drafted. And I’m not so sure their ranking (in of itself) gets them drafted, but rather their hard work and development.

Just my belief, I guess. Especially since even the top player ranking barely gets decent casino betting odds.
The OL position performs worse than other positions at the top, but borderline 50-50 or even 3:1 is a hell of a lot better than 5:1 odds or worse.

It especially comes into play when we're talking about high level NFL talents that go on the first two days of the draft.

But, yes, development matters a lot.
 
So there’s smoke that Brenen Thompson might be committing to Oregon soon too. That would be 2 of our must gets off the board to Oregon. Hopefully it’s just smoke and nothing more.
 
Sark is going to have to improve on Herman's record in his first year to see meaningful results in recruiting. That said, if Herman had played Bijan a few more plays last year, we might have been 9-1 instead of 7-3, so I think it is doable, even though replacing a QB is no small task.
There are many on here that think just winning will solve our recruiting woes with the top kids. Fast forward to Bama and all the winning they have done and they still find it necessary to pay for certain top recruits. Until Texas is willing to do the same not much will change
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleFelix
If I had to bet money on it I’d bet Banks doesn’t sign with Oregon. That’s a long time for a school like Oregon to hang onto a kid from Texas who’s going to still be recruited hard by all the big time programs.
He may have to. Probably got more money than he can pay back.
 
There are many on here that think just winning will solve our recruiting woes with the top kids. Fast forward to Bama and all the winning they have done and they still find it necessary to pay for certain top recruits. Until Texas is willing to do the same not much will change
Which recruits has Bama paid for?
 
Isn’t this the cart before the horse scenario? If you don’t have the players you can’t win big. If you don’t win big, you can’t get the players. If the current O line isn’t good enough, or the QB situation is too green, or the WR Corp not good enough-yet, how do they get to 10 wins, including a win over OU.? I think that’s asking too much of the staff in the first year. If they can’t get the elite players at that position your asking TX to do something I don’t even think Mack was able to accomplish. Where is the allegiance to the University? What happened to going to a school because it’s a great opportunity? Do these players think they won’t get exposure at Texas to showcase their abilities to the NFL? That makes no sense, at least to me, but I’m just an old guy. I think everyone is getting tired of anticipating good news and being disappointed with bad news. It’s human nature, it’s reality. Sark is going to have to do something historically that TX hasn’t been able to do- win with less talented players. Iowa State did it, K State has done it, TCU occasionally has done it(especially against Texas). I really like Sark and his staff,. They must be thinking TX/we shouldn’t be having these problems getting elite players to buy in.

It has been hard on these schools too...Tennessee, Michigan, Penn State, Florida, Florida State, Washington, Colorado, Nebraska, Miami, etc. All of those teams have experienced elite status in their histories yet have floundered for the most part for decades. There are some outlier seasons occasionally. It is just hard to get back to elite status for a variety of reasons. Everything just has to come together.

Texas needs to put together a few decent seasons and has some problems to address this year. I think we have holes in our secondary. Jamison seems like the best player by a long way. Thompson and Green just have not matured yet as DBs that can compete consistently with good WRs. Safeties could be a mess unless some of the younger guys step up. LBs could be solid but not a certainty. Interior Def line should be a plus. Edge rushing is a concern.

We will start the most inexperienced QBs vs OU, ISU, OSU, Baylor, KSU, TCU, and WVU. RBs look good assuming Bijan stays healthy. I think OL can be solid. WRs is a crap shoot. The Horns really need some young, unproven WRs to step up. Think Omeire or the transfer. The tight ends have not been a consistent plus, but there is some experience in Brewer and Wiley.

The good news is there are talented transfers and new guys. Also, the team was competitive with everyone in the conference last year. Of course, they were led by a very experienced, tough, and competitive QB on offense and a playmaking edge rusher on defense. If they can fill those voids, which is a big ask, they should be competitive again. There will likely be growing pains with a new staff. We just have to hope for one of those magical seasons where things click and they win most close games.

If one of the QBs steps up, and Sark and PK can work their magic, they have a chance make some noise. However, so many things have to come together. Sark had success at Alabama as an OC. However, the roster was elite, which likely makes a difference.
 
A team that lost their leader and 4 year starter at QB who's replacement has yet to start a college football game.....
Yeah, but the 4-year starter's inconsistency was one of this program's issues in the last 4 years.

The play at quarterback will be easier to improve than the left tackle or the pass rush.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT