The single thing that is the most surprising to me about the Strong era is the same reason, IMO, why Robinson got an A from me in the poll - fundamentals and assignment football.
Talent aside, I thought the one thing that Strong could control was teaching fundamental football. You know, get the snap count right, minimize penalties across the board, block who you're supposed to and defend this person or area of the field. I just haven't seen that kind of discipline since he's been here and I'm shocked by it, frankly. The guy has a great reputation as a coach. The knock against him was always that he might not be able to handle the PR and CEO side that Mack did so well and is required at a complex program like ours.
When you look at Robinson, it was a "just add water" kind of thing. He took the same talent that his predecessor had and immediately got results by coaching fundamentals. The players immediately responded and we improved almost overnight (we weren't miraculous world beaters, but we weren't getting gashed anymore either).
I like to give people the benefit of the doubt so I choose to be optimistic about the results of Strong getting more involved with the Defense. If his involvement doesn't work, though, I'm afraid that this fan will move on from supporting him because I won't be able to justify his value as the head man. It's already a struggle (as the head man) no matter how much I appreciate what he stands for.