I respectfully disagree about putting Card in the game and here is my logic:
1) Ewers getting yanked still gives him plenty of adversity to work through.
2) With swirling wind, is it a terrible idea to put in a dual threat QB who can tuck and run at any point?
3) How about making TCU, KState and KU have to prepare to face a completely different package at any given moment?
4) I think the chances are remote, but Arky pretty much ruined Card for a huge chunk of last year. He never really recovered (plus I know he was playing hurt.) At some point you have to be careful not to expose your young QB to too much adversity.
1. It was the first time in his career he was in a tied or close game in the fourth quarter. You don't bench the future of your program and undermine his success in that situation.
2. Card almost certainly wouldn't have run it any better than Ewers did in getting the ball near OSU territory. Holding killed the play.
3. Sark is Sark. What you see is what you get.
4. What ruined Card as much as anything was the lack of support he received 7 1/2 quarters into his tenure as a starter. He was thrown under the bus and driven over several times. It was good not to repeat that.