ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend (A question for the ages...)

I think the Sanders v. Ewers debate will only be resolved a few years down the road.
There were times Ewers looked really, really good and times where he was pretty meh. He played against much better competition than Sanders did. I need to see Sanders against better competition.
this
 
I don't know. One guy going really high and another not registers.

Would we say that Ewers is better right now?
QE accomplished more in a much harder conference…not sure who could ever believe that Sanders had a better career in college than QE, and isn’t that what we care about? Drafting is mostly about pro potential, not necessarily college results and as a Texas fan, I care much more about how a player performs in college than their draft evaluation. Colt is a legend, has his number retired and he was drafted as the last player of the third round.
 
Two thoughts about Before Sunrise:

1) Julie Delpy is one of the hottest women to ever live 2) If you know Germans and Austrians the way I know Germans and Austrians, the scene on the bridge with the two Austrian actors who are in the play "Bring me the head of Wilmington's Cow" is one of the funniest scenes in movie history.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ketchum
Never seen it. Never even heard of it.
Great 10 thoughts Ketch!

Re: Ethan Hawk movies
What about “Taking Lives”?
I’m surprised no one has mentioned this one! It’s a top 3-4 movie in my book. If you haven’t seen it, it’s an early 2000s thriller with a really interesting plot twist or two in the storyline. Angelina Jolie plays the perfect “Angelina Jolie character”… not to mention, there’s one epic scene that displays her, uh ummm, “perfection”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ketchum
I just don’t know which one is better. Long term, that is.
I couldn’t say one is better than the other. Ewers had a better team around him. Sanders excelled against weaker competition.

I ask myself how would Sanders have fared on the Texas team that Ewers had? I think Sanders might have had really good numbers, but I just don’t know how Sanders would have handled Alabama, Georgia, UDub, …?

I guess neither one has convinced me with their current body of work. If I’m an NFL GM, I wouldn’t be able to pull the trigger on either one. I don’t think Quinn is a guy that you want to build your team around. I think he is more of a bus driver in the right situation.
I also think they are different types. Apples and oranges.

I think a better question is Sanders or Cam Ward?
I wouldn't draft any of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RLong68
(Buy/Sell) Someone would take Manning and develop him. No way is Sark giving up Terry for one season of either Broughton or Collins.

You answered as Broughton or Collins. The question was Broughton and Sanders. May be the same answer, but it is a different question.
Yup my bad. The answer might be buy in that case.
 
Training Day is easily #1 for Hawke, but Daybreakers is clearly #2.
Stop Motion No GIF by Mouse
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Troyboy8ball
Two thoughts about Before Sunrise:

1) Julie Delpy is one of the hottest women to ever live 2) If you know Germans and Austrians the way I know Germans and Austrians, the scene on the bridge with the two Austrian actors who are in the play "Bring me the head of Wilmington's Cow" is one of the funniest scenes in movie history.
That's awesome.
 
Great 10 thoughts Ketch!

Re: Ethan Hawk movies
What about “Taking Lives”?
I’m surprised no one has mentioned this one! It’s a top 3-4 movie in my book. If you haven’t seen it, it’s an early 2000s thriller with a really interesting plot twist or two in the storyline. Angelina Jolie plays the perfect “Angelina Jolie character”… not to mention, there’s one epic scene that displays her, uh ummm, “perfection”.
I need to see it.
 
Before sunrise is the best of the trilogy. 2,1, then 3. Same order as original Star Wars
 
NFL scouts?
If you think NFL scouts believe Sanders was truly a better QB in college (vs has more NFL potential)...ok. I thought the point of re-ranking was to show how they performed in college vs their pre-college ranking.
 
Thanks for taking my B/S this week. I was a bit long, and, in the future, I will try to shorten them.

I understand that people can reasonably conclude that CDC did not 'have' to hire RT when Beard was let go., and while I concede that CDC could have hired someone else, I think the fallout from the national media was something that CDC was trying to sidestep. Take a look at the chronology:
  • 1973-Texas hired its first Women's Basketball Coach and its first black Head coach of any sport, Rodney Page.
  • To my knowledge there were no other black HC's in any sport at Texas until Charlie Strong was hired in 2014 (if there were any in between, please let me know) and if that is correct that is over 40 years between the hiring of a black HC in any sport; and even if there were others, certainly there were no black HC's at Texas in the Big Three sports.
  • Shaka Smart was hired in 2015.
  • Strong was fired in 2016. Strong did not produce, but the first black HC of the Big Three sports was gone...and fairly quickly, but the firing was definitely justified.
  • The Eyes of Texas controversy was a big social media story in 2020; football players demanded the song be banned; Tom Herman was let go in part due to his handling of this controversy.
  • December of 2022 Beard was fired amid another controversial big social media story this time dealing with women's issues.
  • Rodney Terry stepped in and guided the team to the Elite Eight and most national college basketball pundits suggested this good man had proven his loyalty and competency to the University of Texas and must or at least should be made HC and many were shocked he was not made the HC before the season ended.
In my opinion, CDC did not want another national media blackeye about Texas sports as it related to race and gender issues. CDC and, I bet, Eltife wanted it to just go away and if RT did not produce, for this Football School 'quietly' to get rid of its MBB HC at a time of lesser social media focus; although I do understand, CDC could have hired someone else, and he and Texas could have weathered that social media storm.
 
If you think NFL scouts believe Sanders was truly a better QB in college (vs has more NFL potential)...ok. I thought the point of re-ranking was to show how they performed in college vs their pre-college ranking.
The point of the re-ranking is to rank them in the order of their finish with the data in front of us.
 
Thanks for taking my B/S this week. I was a bit long, and, in the future, I will try to shorten them.

I understand that people can reasonably conclude that CDC did not 'have' to hire RT when Beard was let go., and while I concede that CDC could have hired someone else, I think the fallout from the national media was something that CDC was trying to sidestep. Take a look at the chronology:
  • 1973-Texas hired its first Women's Basketball Coach and its first black Head coach of any sport, Rodney Page.
  • To my knowledge there were no other black HC's in any sport at Texas until Charlie Strong was hired in 2014 (if there were any in between, please let me know) and if that is correct that is over 40 years between the hiring of a black HC in any sport; and even if there were others, certainly there were no black HC's at Texas in the Big Three sports.
  • Shaka Smart was hired in 2015.
  • Strong was fired in 2016. Strong did not produce, but the first black HC of the Big Three sports was gone...and fairly quickly, but the firing was definitely justified.
  • The Eyes of Texas controversy was a big social media story in 2020; football players demanded the song be banned; Tom Herman was let go in part due to his handling of this controversy.
  • December of 2022 Beard was fired amid another controversial big social media story this time dealing with women's issues.
  • Rodney Terry stepped in and guided the team to the Elite Eight and most national college basketball pundits suggested this good man had proven his loyalty and competency to the University of Texas and must or at least should be made HC and many were shocked he was not made the HC before the season ended.
In my opinion, CDC did not want another national media blackeye about Texas sports as it related to race and gender issues. CDC and, I bet, Eltife wanted it to just go away and if RT did not produce, for this Football School 'quietly' to get rid of its MBB HC at a time of lesser social media focus; although I do understand, CDC could have hired someone else, and he and Texas could have weathered that social media storm.
The fallout would have lasted a day. That's the part everyone missed on.
 
The fallout would have lasted a day. That's the part everyone missed on.
That is 100% conjecture. You have no verified basis to say “everyone missed on”. It’s an opinion.
CDC isn’t some woke clown. He knew there would be more than a days worth of fallout.
He is the best in the business and this is one of the reasons why.
 
That is 100% conjecture. You have no verified basis to say “everyone missed on”. It’s an opinion.
CDC isn’t some woke clown. He knew there would be more than a days worth of fallout.
He is the best in the business and this is one of the reasons why.
There are absolutely was a way to control the narrative. CDC was very passive aggressive and it bit him in the rear.

There's almost no example in sports where you can site a similar example having a shelf life of 48 hours in today's media cycle. It was a non-sensical Boogieman. Texas basketball as a brand doesn't move the needle for 48 hours, no matter what. The only people that think thats getting talked about on First take 36 hours later are Texas fans.
 
There are absolutely was a way to control the narrative. CDC was very passive aggressive and it bit him in the rear.

There's almost no example in sports where you can site a similar example having a shelf life of 48 hours in today's media cycle. It was a non-sensical Boogieman. Texas basketball as a brand doesn't move the needle for 48 hours, no matter what. The only people that think thats getting talked about on First take 36 hours later are Texas fans.

I’m pretty sure the negative recruiting against Texas the institution would continue for a whole lot more than 2 days.
Texas dismissed 2 AA coaches back to back. Then we can another after an Elite 8 Run?
CDC didn’t jump the gun or get stupid and passive. CDC is the Man for a reason. He is better at his job than you me and all the Texas fans bloviating on the interwebs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slothrop
I’m pretty sure the negative recruiting against Texas the institution would continue for a whole lot more than 2 days.
Texas dismissed 2 AA coaches back to back. Then we can another after an Elite 8 Run?
CDC didn’t jump the gun or get stupid and passive. CDC is the Man for a reason. He is better at his job than you me and all the Texas fans bloviating on the interwebs.

Can you give me just one example of something like this happening?

I've written about this in the past and I write about it in real rime. He lost the narrative. That was avoidable.
 
There are absolutely was a way to control the narrative. CDC was very passive aggressive and it bit him in the rear.

There's almost no example in sports where you can site a similar example having a shelf life of 48 hours in today's media cycle. It was a non-sensical Boogieman. Texas basketball as a brand doesn't move the needle for 48 hours, no matter what. The only people that think thats getting talked about on First take 36 hours later are Texas fans.
Yeah it would have lasted about 30 minutes. The news cycle moves so fast and nobody gives a shit about that hire in the bigger picture anyway.
 
Regarding Allen and Woodson, aside from the fact that they played different spots in the secondary, and were both former ASU Sun Devils, I think BOTH are worthy of HOF induction. Allen was a cornerback, a premier position, then and now, and Woodson was a safety. Allen did end up with 31 more INT's during his career (54) than Woodson (23), and he housed 6 more of them (8) than DW (2), so he was the flashier player. I don't know about better overall player, since their positions required different things. Eric Allen getting in is NOT the reason Woodson is not in, and I hope the veteran's committee rectifies that soon.
 
Regarding Allen and Woodson, aside from the fact that they played different spots in the secondary, and were both former ASU Sun Devils, I think BOTH are worthy of HOF induction. Allen was a cornerback, a premier position, then and now, and Woodson was a safety. Allen did end up with 31 more INT's during his career (54) than Woodson (23), and he housed 6 more of them (8) than DW (2), so he was the flashier player. I don't know about better overall player, since their positions required different things. Eric Allen getting in is NOT the reason Woodson is not in, and I hope the veteran's committee rectifies that soon.
Eric Allen was never the best player on an all-time great team. By the time we got to 1995, you can say that about Woodson and the back end of the dynasty. He was that good.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT