ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From the Weekend (Heads need to roll in Waco)

I'm not saying you're wrong in that sexual assault is sexual assault, but you're comparing (in almost all cases) a statutory scheme of underage people being legally incapable of consenting to sex to a violent rape. They aren't close to the same--legally speaking or in a "shock the conscience" test.

Your point isn't invalid, but for someone that seems to care about taking it all seriously, you considerably damage your position when you seem to advocate that it's ok to ignore this instance if people have ignored things in the past.
Not claiming we should ignore this instance. Quite the opposite.
 
It might be easier to buy into this wave of emotion were it not coming on a message board that often champions the sexual assault of young men by hot female teachers. Perhaps we should all take it very personally all of the time - regardless of who the victim and/or predator are.
You won't find me in disagreement. I've talked about the double standard and ridiculous nature of responses quite a bit.
 
SIAP - This is a really touchy issue. Baylor might come out smelling like a rose. It can be extremely difficult for her to participate in a trial. She's probably just trying to get past it because she'll never forget it. Depending on her financial need, and her mindset, she might decide to take the first offer. Regrettable but a real possibility IMO.
She will get paid. This will never go to trial.
 
All those words and not a direct or specific complaint, just generalities. What specifically did you have an issue with? Let's start there.

Second, I was all over Bob Stoops like stink on shit over the Mixon incident, DGB and going all the way back to Dusty D. That ol' dog ain't gonna hunt, son.

I'd tell you to stick to something, but this post doesn't give any indication of what you do well.

Coming at me isn't it, that's for sure.
Nothing specific? I'd suggest you reread, but what would be the point? More denial won't reveal anything. I wasn't "coming at" you and I'm still not. I disagreed with what you did and said. I still do. If you want a blog that is limited only to those unwilling to question you, so be it. I would have welcomed an exchange of ideas, but instead, received the above reply. Are you so sure of yourself that a contrary viewpoint is always a personal "attack"?
 
Honest question: Can we not agree that BOBA got booted more for a body of work of trolling, than for a stance in one thread? Also, I knew right when it happened, he'd be okay and back in a day or two. Pretty sure he's had a few time outs before. I guess what I'm asking is, if we keep debating this topic , which is a big topic to many here, can we leave BOBA's time out out of it? If it's a major point to you, then I understand.

Also don't see the point in bringing up the Case and Jordan tag team. That girl was a willing participant.

Well, my main issue with what's happened over the past few days is BOBA getting the boot for having a difference of opinion. I probably wouldn't have said anything at all about the rest of what's happened. Yes, the crusade is weird to me, but it's not that big of a deal outside of those who also find it weird being attacked or banned.

I don't really even care to debate the various points as I'm not trying to change your mind. I was just laying out where I and some others were coming from. I guess we'll all just see where it goes from here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orangeuglad
A few things if you care to read and digest them from someone that has an intimate knowledge of the legal system, evidence rules, procedural rules, and some idea of basic communication between individuals that doesn't always come across as it may be intended:
  • First, I know you do not have an agenda that is in anyway looking to protect Briles/Baylor as @Take Dead Aim has suggested. I don't really know you as a poster TDA, but @texasguy2310 is unquestionably an entrenched Longhorn fan and graduate if memory serves me correctly. This is not an issue where some Baylor troll is outing themselves;
  • Second, the Boise PD shouldn't be in the conversation here. Boise St., it's administration, and coach all acted swiftly to get this animal out of their program and school. I've seen nothing to suggest that his ex-girlfriend who was the subject of his violence was looking to press charges which is not shocking. She was scared, went to the administration/police, they protected her and had a plan to keep her away from Sam U., called his parents to inform them of what happened, and basically expelled him from campus. If Baylor acted in an even remotely similar fashion, do you think anyone is talking about this right now?
  • Bringing up other miscellaneous issues with the NCAA when a now convicted rapist--say that outloud: a convicted rapist--was allowed to stay on campus, protected by the administration and coaching staff when they said a few months ago they expected him to return to play football after his "issues" (which is apparently Baylor code for "rape trial") were resolved, is completely irrelevant when discussing this specific topic. Could we have a long talk about necessary reforms to the NCAA? Sure, we could do that for a while, but when it comes to a female being raped, then basically ignored and forced out of the university by the university administration, it's not really the time or place to have that discussion. This goes for the Case/Hicks situation as well--while those guys will never be confused with upstanding gentlemen by anyone that knows that story, they didn't pin down an 18 year old virgin, rape her, tell her "this isn't rape" while raping her, then stay enrolled and graduate while standing trial for rape at their respective universities (later being convicted of rape).
  • Art Briles knew the kids violent history against women, admitting he knew of a "rocky relationship with his ex-girlfriend," and I know you aren't the person that believes Briles' bullshit about that subject coming up only in the context that the kid was depressed. Peterson issued his statement that he fully appraised Briles of the situation and Briles changed his story in less than 12 hours to include the fact he knew of the relationship history of the ex-girlfriend, which he earlier said nothing other than depression and being homesick was ever discussed. You would think that asshole would bring up knowing about the ex-girlfriend, even if he's lying about the context, originally when he's denying knowledge about anything unless he thinks no one will call him out which is exactly what Peterson did. That is not an insignificant detail to omit when that ex-girlfriend is testifying against your player;
  • I think your issue is with who is covering it in detail and why--which when stepping back and viewing objectively, I don't think you're making a bad point--although the fact someone/anyone is trying to keep this at the forefront of discussion, regardless of motivation, isn't a bad thing IMO. It's disgusting what happened and I don't really care if the heat that stays on Briles/Baylor is coming from an objective or biased journalist--I just hope it keeps coming;
  • I think I've covered my thoughts on the BOBA issue, but despite all the thoughts I feel like I've spelled out in pretty specific detail, I think I've come around to the position that I hope @Ketchum let's him back on the board after a couple week timeout. I've seen guys like @echeese (see, tagged ya!) benefit from a little time-off when they were really pissing off a lot of people (rightly or wrongly), and BOBA probably deserves the same instead of an outright ban. I can't believe I'm typing that and it probably won't change my stance on reading his posts, but fair is fair is fair.

Fair points. Points I've thought about and will continue to think about as more info comes out. This story isn't over. I've said before that I reserve the right to change my mind the more I learn and think about what I've learned. We all should be open to that, I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orangeuglad
Sexual assaults impact all of us. Mothers, girl friends, wives, sisters, cousins, aunts.

You'll find I'm quite active in this front, not just this time.

I would argue we all need to take it very personally. This is about as f'd up as a college football scandal gets outside of child abuse and murder.

BOBA was not suspended because of his opinions on this subject. That's simply not what happened, no matter how many times you suppose that it is. I've been quite open about the whys of that situation.

Sexual assault is not acceptable. Who in the world is saying it is? The criminal justice system did its job and the guy has been convicted. None of that is at issue here. Where you and I differ are the targets of our disapproval of the sexual assault and the degree to which we take the situation personally. This case had absolutely nothing to do with me or you. Us having female family members or friends doesn't change that. Everyone in the sports world is talking about this issue, so it's not going anywhere. So, when you and your staff attempt to engage in Twitter battles with anyone that will listen, when you get overly emotional in a piece you write about the situation, when you repeatedly set yourself up as the lone voice of reason and justice when everyone else is silent, it strikes me as odd. It doesn't feel genuine to me. It feels as though you're piggybacking on a story for your own reasons. I don't know you, personally, as a man. I could be off base. I'm just telling you how it's coming across to several people.
 
I don't give a crap what your opinion of OB policy is. I don't give a crap if you don't want to hold the HC responsible for the people he brings into his program. But if you don't want to fix the systematic problems at Baylor, the only conclusion I can come to is that you don't care about the victim. I'm not mad at you knucklehead, it's not personal.

We're clearly not communicating effectively.
 
Sexual assault is not acceptable. Who in the world is saying it is? The criminal justice system did its job and the guy has been convicted. None of that is at issue here. Where you and I differ are the targets of our disapproval of the sexual assault and the degree to which we take the situation personally. This case had absolutely nothing to do with me or you. Us having female family members or friends doesn't change that. Everyone in the sports world is talking about this issue, so it's not going anywhere. So, when you and your staff attempt to engage in Twitter battles with anyone that will listen, when you get overly emotional in a piece you write about the situation, when you repeatedly set yourself up as the lone voice of reason and justice when everyone else is silent, it strikes me as odd. It doesn't feel genuine to me. It feels as though you're piggybacking on a story for your own reasons. I don't know you, personally, as a man. I could be off base. I'm just telling you how it's coming across to several people.

You know what else is not acceptable? The way that the victim was treated after the fact, and how the university just wanted her to go away. THAT is why so many people want heads to roll. THAT is why I want to see heads roll. So when the next time it happens at another school (it will) that the girl is treated the way a victim should be, and not swept under the rug.
 
You know what else is not acceptable? The way that the victim was treated after the fact, and how the university just wanted her to go away. THAT is why so many people want heads to roll. THAT is why I want to see heads roll. So when the next time it happens at another school (it will) that the girl is treated the way a victim should be, and not swept under the rug.

Absolutely. The Baylor administration is culpable. The leaders of that internal investigation are culpable. No doubt about it.
 
Societally, we have a problem with respecting & protecting women. The situation at Baylor is just an extreme example of a culture that frequently dehumanizes women. It's amazing to watch the comments roll in when a beautiful woman, who is not connected to anyone on OB, is posted on the board. It's a barrage of comments about PIIHB, f'ing her raw, drinking her bathwater, motorboat gifs, phallic eruption gifs, etc. Yet, when someone posts something about his wife or daughter (who happens to be a beautiful), you see the restrained comments: "What a beautiful young lady", "you must be proud", "you out kicked your coverage", etc.

Why do we assign value & respect to the women in our own lives (and expect others to as well), but aren't willing to offer that same value & respect to the women in others' lives, whom we have no connection to? Why do we, as a society, demand that men respect women physically, but not verbally? If women are worthy of respect, value, and protection, then they're worthy it in both words & actions.........and at all times, not just when it comes to physical harm. Just my $.02.

Excellent post.

It's a symptom of a culture that approves men acting like lust-driven teenage boys perpetually. If society deemed the type of language that you mentioned unacceptable, you'd see far less of it. But within the subculture of guys hanging out "being guys", it's normal; which is a sad indictment on where we are overall. Talking about any woman as an object of sexual desire and nothing more dehumanizes her, plain and simple.

Most people have the restraint to not allow their internal thoughts to give birth to the type of horrors that lead to what we've seen in this situation with Baylor, but that is the end of that type of mentality, the same way that murder is the end game of a mind filled with thoughts of anger toward a person or persons. Most don't let it get that far, but the root is the same. Gotta fix the problem at the root if you really want it fixed.
 
Nothing specific? I'd suggest you reread, but what would be the point? More denial won't reveal anything. I wasn't "coming at" you and I'm still not. I disagreed with what you did and said. I still do. If you want a blog that is limited only to those unwilling to question you, so be it. I would have welcomed an exchange of ideas, but instead, received the above reply. Are you so sure of yourself that a contrary viewpoint is always a personal "attack"?
Nothing specific? I'd suggest you reread, but what would be the point? More denial won't reveal anything. I wasn't "coming at" you and I'm still not. I disagreed with what you did and said. I still do. If you want a blog that is limited only to those unwilling to question you, so be it. I would have welcomed an exchange of ideas, but instead, received the above reply. Are you so sure of yourself that a contrary viewpoint is always a personal "attack"?
So, I guess that's a no. You won't quote a specific passage of the article and tell me your issues. Just a bunch of generalities.

That's not much of a viewpoint at all.
 
Sexual assault is not acceptable. Who in the world is saying it is? The criminal justice system did its job and the guy has been convicted. None of that is at issue here. Where you and I differ are the targets of our disapproval of the sexual assault and the degree to which we take the situation personally. This case had absolutely nothing to do with me or you. Us having female family members or friends doesn't change that. Everyone in the sports world is talking about this issue, so it's not going anywhere. So, when you and your staff attempt to engage in Twitter battles with anyone that will listen, when you get overly emotional in a piece you write about the situation, when you repeatedly set yourself up as the lone voice of reason and justice when everyone else is silent, it strikes me as odd. It doesn't feel genuine to me. It feels as though you're piggybacking on a story for your own reasons. I don't know you, personally, as a man. I could be off base. I'm just telling you how it's coming across to several people.
And I would tell you the emails suggesting the contrary outnumber your thoughts 25:1
 
I just couldn't disagree more. I have seen this site meltdown over quite a few stupid things the past three years, but when the rape case broke last year over Saunders, no one thought he should be given another chance and all were happy when he was dismissed.

I would imagine that if the same thing happened here that happened in Waco, we would be calling for Charlie's head.

When we look up north and see what Briles did, and continues to do, I doubt very seriously many are thinking about football, other than the awareness being drawn to it because it happened in the football progam. It boils my blood to watch people, supposed Christians, defend that piece of shit.
The point that I originally agreed with is that some, if not much, of the emotion on this message board stems from the fact it is Baylor - a traditional doormat that has landed a coach many dislike and who has knocked us around recently. Changing the venue of discussion to UT doesn't alter that - of course we'd care if something this heinous occurred at our school. Put these events at Ball State or Bowling Green or wherever, and it's not getting the emotional play found in this thread. None of that changes the fact that the rape is a horrible thing AND that Briles should not likely be coaching at Baylor going forward.
 
So, who wins? Unfortunately, the herd doesn't sway me. That said, I'm happy to acknowledge that others feel differently about the situation than I do.
I'm never going to make everyone happy. I just go with my instincts.
 
Sure. What excerpt from my post was intending to convey was that I don't hold Art Briles responsible for the security of women in Waco, TX. That work?
No it doesn't work. Chastity is a word used to describe a state whereby an individual chooses to preserve their virginity. Your use of the word is dripping with sarcasm. We're not talking about chastity but rape, which inherently is a violent, involuntary act.
I'm not. At all. What cause do you think they're championing? Seriously. With all the periphery info, the weeping, the Twitter campaign.... What's the goal? What's the endgame? That's what I mean. What cause is being championed here? Fire Art Briles? For what, exactly? Arrest Art Briles for rape?
I am backing Ketch's call to hold the powers at Baylor, including Briles, accountable who invited this monster onto a college campus and harbored him after an indictment for rape. If a thorough investigation finds Briles responsible for or complicit in inviting a known rapist onto campus and protecting him after another rape on the Baylor campus then he should be fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cordpetee
I'm never going to make everyone happy. I just go with my instincts.

Man, you don't have to make me happy. That's not the thing. My beef with you directly was more related to BOBA and his dismissal. I feel the way I feel about it and you disagree. It is what it is.

My beef with the O-Bloods staff is that this crusade doesn't feel genuine to me. You hear about the accused rapist heading to Lane College? If this is a genuine crusade and you feel it's your place to comment on all of these situations, please launch a campaign against Derrick Burroughs. Make it about all of these kinds of things and not just about the rival head coach that owns that ass.

Has Derrick Burroughs been fired yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: babyshoe
No it doesn't work. Chastity is a word used to describe a state whereby an individual chooses to preserve their virginity. Your use of the word is dripping with sarcasm. We're not talking about chastity but rape, which inherently is a violent, involuntary act.

I am backing Ketch's call to hold the powers at Baylor, including Briles, accountable who invited this monster onto a college campus and harbored him after an indictment for rape. If a thorough investigation finds Briles responsible for or complicit in inviting a known rapist onto campus and protecting him after another rape on the Baylor campus then he should be fired.

Fair enough.
 
So, who wins? Unfortunately, the herd doesn't sway me. That said, I'm happy to acknowledge that others feel differently about the situation than I do.
e1a19565a229fdb007acd1fc330fe7b7.jpg
 
Man, you don't have to make me happy. That's not the thing. My beef with you directly was more related to BOBA and his dismissal. I feel the way I feel about it and you disagree. It is what it is.

My beef with the O-Bloods staff is that this crusade doesn't feel genuine to me. You hear about the accused rapist heading to Lane College? If this is a genuine crusade and you feel it's your place to comment on all of these situations, please launch a campaign against Derrick Burroughs. Make it about all of these kinds of things and not just about the rival head coach that owns that ass.

Has Derrick Burroughs been fired yet?

This.
 
  • Like
Reactions: texasguy2310
Then you would be wrong. He accepted this person into his org, he owns it. When I hire someone, I get them and my boss trusts me to make a good decision. If that person turns out to be a bad fit I don't get to blame my boss who is focused on other things.
When you hire someone, they don't pay you monthly to work for you. You pay them. BOBA, like the rest of us, are paying customers. And I don't know how else it has to be beaten into your brain, but he didn't do anything worth being banned. He should be let back on, or refunded his money.
 
Then you would be wrong. He accepted this person into his org, he owns it. When I hire someone, I get them and my boss trusts me to make a good decision. If that person turns out to be a bad fit I don't get to blame my boss who is focused on other things.

Well, that certainly closes the book on things. Thanks.

Has Derrick Burroughs been fired yet?
 
Man, you don't have to make me happy. That's not the thing. My beef with you directly was more related to BOBA and his dismissal. I feel the way I feel about it and you disagree. It is what it is.

My beef with the O-Bloods staff is that this crusade doesn't feel genuine to me. You hear about the accused rapist heading to Lane College? If this is a genuine crusade and you feel it's your place to comment on all of these situations, please launch a campaign against Derrick Burroughs. Make it about all of these kinds of things and not just about the rival head coach that owns that ass.

Has Derrick Burroughs been fired yet?

facepalm2.jpg


BTW, Art Briles has a 4-3 record vs Texas in his career. Not exactly "owning that ass"....but keep preaching. Sic 'em, right?
 
Man, you don't have to make me happy. That's not the thing. My beef with you directly was more related to BOBA and his dismissal. I feel the way I feel about it and you disagree. It is what it is.

My beef with the O-Bloods staff is that this crusade doesn't feel genuine to me. You hear about the accused rapist heading to Lane College? If this is a genuine crusade and you feel it's your place to comment on all of these situations, please launch a campaign against Derrick Burroughs. Make it about all of these kinds of things and not just about the rival head coach that owns that ass.

Has Derrick Burroughs been fired yet?
1, I've written about the subject of sexual assault in college athletics numerous times. I wrote about Lizzy Seeberg several times. I wrote about the OU situations. I wrote about the UT situations. It doesn't feel genuine tio you because you have a natural disposition against me, personally, that creates that line of thinking.

My history certainly does not suggest that this is a fly-by situation . Honestly, it's insulting, but whatever. Honestly, I don';t expect any better from you based on previous conversations. I've received from you exactly what I would expect with your entrance to the conversation.

2. The situations at Lane College and what happened at Baylor are as different as apples and oranges. Both might be fruit, but some on, you use common sense.

3. Little bit of nuance here, but perhaps if you use some, you'll see how different the situations are.

That being said, I would not personally allow Derric Burroughs into my school and the coach/AD that are need to be asked some serious questions. If anything happens on their watch, that's their ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Take Dead Aim
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT