Man, the guys that can tear it up in both areas do not grow on trees.I have just always preferred to go get big fast animals and let them do big fast animal things. I think you can get a coach that checks both boxes x's and o's and rainmaker.
Man, the guys that can tear it up in both areas do not grow on trees.I have just always preferred to go get big fast animals and let them do big fast animal things. I think you can get a coach that checks both boxes x's and o's and rainmaker.
Roach has literally been missing in action for most of the last two seasons.
He has struggled with his hand on the ground, which is why they kept moving him to linebacker, despite the fact he couldn't get on the field.That's fair, I'm definitely thinking injuries and miscasting him positionally is a part of it. If the roster is to be believed, him up to 290 evidences his body is being allowed to go where it was heading all along. So I'm finding excuses for his MIA. I think he's just too smart a football player with too unique physical skills to not end up being highly productive, but next year we'll have the definite answer. By the way, I get where you are coming from and think its a reasonable take across the board.
Didn't he miss 2/3 of last year with an injured foot?Roach has literally been missing in action for most of the last two seasons.
I think you're proving my point without knowing that you're proving my point.
He has struggled with his hand on the ground, which is why they kept moving him to linebacker, despite the fact he couldn't get on the field.
The defense was screaming for help in the pass rush along the line last year and he was a zero impact player in that area.
That's a red alarm going off.
I agree but don't you think Texas is one of the places that should not have to settle with certain deficiencies. I know head coaches love their boys sometimes....but Giles lack of gusto on the recruiting front is not a secret in the coaching world.Man, the guys that can tear it up in both areas do not grow on trees.
why should they be collective upgrades? Neither belongs in the same sentence with Omenihu.
No, he played in 2/3 of the games.Didn't he miss 2/3 of last year with an injured foot?
That's not what I asked you. Which guy out of that group is the guy you can absolutely bank on the most?
You still haven't answered the question.That’s smug but inaccurate. You used returning sacks and TFLs 2018 v 2019 as the basis for your skepticism. That’s meaningless unless you multiply the 2019 returning stats to correspond to playing time.
I think they just needed to let him get bigger and move him inside. Sort of like when they had Nelson playing end in 2017.
As to the quoted comment above, heading into their senior seasons, respectively, Roach had shown more than Omenihu.
Can you please answer the question?That’s why I said it was the wrong question. But I see your point. We can’t be optimistic unless the returning players already have lots of playing time and stats - through which stats you can bank and quantify your optimism. If that’s your measure, you ought to transfer your concerns to cornerback.
Who asked "Five or more losses this season will result in Herman’s termination?"? That question is SO OFF base. Is this person an aggie poser? Who else would be wondering such a question (and maybe hoping for it)? I am just stunned by it.Cinco
A 17-year subscriber.Who asked "Five or more losses this season will result in Herman’s termination?"? That question is SO OFF base. Is this person an aggie poser? Who else would be wondering such a question (and maybe hoping for it)? I am just stunned by it.
Can you please answer the question?
I probably agree with you.I’ll have to go with the player the coaches are raving about - T Graham.
You still haven't answered the question.
Yes, I used production as a key point to discussing the questions of this team.
why should they be collective upgrades? Neither belongs in the same sentence with Omenihu.
I probably agree with you.
It has to be noted, though, that Graham was not a plus player a year ago. He struggled to rush the passer and at times the coaches preferred to keep running out Hager, despite the fact he wasn't any better.
He's the most bankable player on the line and he's a major question mark at this point.
Hence, the top section.
So, with equal playing time, you are asserting the production would be just as good?Here is your production analysis:
“The production of 2018 along the defensive line with the three starters featured a combined 115 tackles, 31 tackles for loss and 12 sacks, which came on the heels of that trio recording a combined 69 tackles, 19 tackles for loss and nine sacks as juniors.
With the departure of that senior trio goes a ton of production and never was the impact of their departures more profound than on the opening week of spring practice when their spots in the line-up were filled with the likes of junior Taquan Graham, senior Gerald Wilbon and senior Malcolm Roach - a trio that combined for a mere 3.5 tackles for loss and two sacks in 2018.”
In order to have the meaning you impart to them, these numbers have to be calibrated to relative playing time. You would also need to include the tackles number for the current returners.
Except he was a sophomore that started the entire season, instead of a reserve that barely played meaningful snaps because of a lack of production.That sounds a lot like an analysis that would have belonged to Omenihu coming out of his sophomore season.
I think there's some confirmation bias in this opinion.I don’t think the gap between roach and omenihu is larger between the Hager and graham.
So, with equal playing time, you are asserting the production would be just as good?
That isn't apples to apples... at all.To compare apples to apples, you’d have to take the 2017 production of Omenihu, Hager and Nelson (69 tackles 19 TFLs and 9 sacks) and adjust the ? tackles, 3.5 TFL and 2 sacks of Graham, Wilbon and Roach upward to correspond to the 2017 playing time for Omenihu, Hager and Nelson versus the 2018 playing time of Graham, Wilbon and Roach.
I’d also like to know the fumbles caused/recovered stats and if bowl games are included because one of the biggest plays of 2018/9 was Graham causing Swift’s fumble in the Sugar Bowl that Wilbon recovered.
I love both. I want both.My B/S questions never make it. I think they are hard hitting and thought provoking.
Bewbs or Butts
![]()
VS
![]()
Except he was a sophomore that started the entire season, instead of a reserve that barely played meaningful snaps because of a lack of production.
Yeah, I'm the one in this thread that is reaching...You’re reaching now.
That isn't apples to apples... at all.