His stats suggest he’s a good QB, not great. He’s a game manager. He’s not going to light teams up on a consistent basis. The reason we struggled with K State is because we turned the ball over. This is what Ewers does best, but let’s stop pretending that he’s this generational or even great player because he’s not.
I think his stats (and results) show he's better than good. And I think you're underselling what he's done.
We see what happened without Ewers during the KSU game--damn near lost it--because we have an inexperienced and raw quarterback who plays loose with the ball and only had a 55% completion percentage in high school to begin with.
In his worst game, Ewers hasn't looked as bad as Murphy-not even close--even last year, when he didn't look good often times.
And yes, he has lit teams up this year--we're 8-1 largely because of him turning in big numbers, and coming up big in pressure situations.
Nobody has said that he's a generational player--but who really is? those guys don't come around very often. There are NO generational players at the college level this year. Is he going to be good in the NFL? Who knows? The odds against anyone being a great QB at the NFL level are low. But as a college player? I'll take him any day. Seeing some of these other slug QBs like what we have in the big 12, and I say, "glad we have Ewers."
And nobody is pretending about Ewers, he has flaws--in fact most have criticized Ewers extensively, and most are saying that he should come back so he can work on his development.
But he has a lot of talent that we have seen and has significantly improved since last year--and there's no reason to assume that he won't continue to improve.
One other thing-you say he doesn't make players around him better. Brooks, Mitchell, Worthy, have had really good seasons--and it's not over yet.
Ask Worthy how he feels in Ewers' absence.