Their QB looked pretty average as a passer.It would be a hell of a shoot out IMO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their QB looked pretty average as a passer.It would be a hell of a shoot out IMO.
They didn’t say which year, clever.
You might be right, but they have two quality wins IMO.Interesting but I disagree. I think they are an SEC fraud. Ehlinger’s team over Nix all day. The rest of your top 10 I agree with you.
100-percent agree.Nice write-up, @Ketchum. Some good points that I agree completely with.
I have a question for you regarding Jevan Snead ((RIP, Jevan, so sorry to see this). I have always thought Mack Brown blew a chance at a B12 title playing Colt against aggy at the end of the season when McCoy couldn't throw the ball 10 yards because of the lingering effects of his stinger injury. So aggy stacked the box, we lost 10-7 and Colt was carted off the field. If Brown had played Jevan, I believe we would have won. I know Jevan was erratic in relief the week before in Manhattan, but he put up 28 points. Jevan with a leash would have had a better chance to win that game with our defense. Your thoughts?
I don’t consider A&M a quality win. Oregon yes.You might be right, but they have two quality wins IMO.
Roy was just dominant in a way that looking a the stats doesn't show. He also played with poorer quarterback play.What criteria did you use as the main support for the top 10 WR seasons as they all are different. I could see some being better then others ( receptions, yards or TDs). Was just curious what makes the #2 better then the #3? Obviously Shipley is no doubt #1.
In fact, he's so new school that when he followed an unconventional decision with a worse play-call, he didn't even sweat to bother with that whole unconventional part of it all.
“Not the decision to go for it, but went to the well one too many times on a play that had been good to us the entire year,” Herman said. “Should have known they’d be in an all-out coverage zero blitz to stop that play. I was disappointed in myself.”
But, Tom ... it was fourth and three ...
“I know you guys are infatuated with the binder, and the binder says anything under six [yards] to go for it,” Herman said. “I kind of listened to it a little bit. But you know, we were playing pretty good. It was just it was an ill-advised call. It was the right decision. It was a poor call.”
(The binder says WHAT?!?! Sorry, I just felt the need for a quick footnote)
LOL. Everyone knows CS is one of your sub accounts. You ARE CS! LMAO.(Buy) It's like we're in each other's minds sometimes.
Lulz. They aren't beating their daddy blowU. Our floor this year is losing 2 conference games, and obviously we'd have the tie breaker over them.
Here's where the program is at with Herman's 4th down calls.
In 2019 against power 5 opponents, Herman is 1-4 on 4th down conversios, with all three misses taking points off the board. The lone successful conversion was the Duvernay touchdown in the LSU game where the ball was at the LSU 44 and no points were taken off the board.
I'm not sure what's in the binder, but the analytics currently say the offense sucks shit through a straw on 4th down, especially when taking points off the board.
Our FG % is 73 over the last two seasons. Hardly automatic. So it can’t be guaranteed we’re “taking points off the board”. I assume that goes into Tom’s thinking.
Here's where the program is at with Herman's 4th down calls.
In 2019 against power 5 opponents, Herman is 1-4 on 4th down conversios, with all three misses taking points off the board. The lone successful conversion was the Duvernay touchdown in the LSU game where the ball was at the LSU 44 and no points were taken off the board.
I'm not sure what's in the binder, but the analytics currently say the offense sucks shit through a straw on 4th down, especially when taking points off the board.
Dicker is pretty darn good.Our FG % is 73 over the last two seasons. Hardly automatic. So it can’t be guaranteed we’re “taking points off the board”. I assume that goes into Tom’s thinking.
Here's where the program is at with Herman's 4th down calls.
In 2019 against power 5 opponents, Herman is 1-4 on 4th down conversios, with all three misses taking points off the board. The lone successful conversion was the Duvernay touchdown in the LSU game where the ball was at the LSU 44 and no points were taken off the board.
I'm not sure what's in the binder, but the analytics currently say the offense sucks shit through a straw on 4th down, especially when taking points off the board.
The team and Coach Herman would probably say last years game was last year, but damn did that West Virginia game really make the blood boil.
Have a feeling our guys will be fired up for that game.
What am I looking at here?
This guy is scoring 100% of the timeOur FG % is 73 over the last two seasons. Hardly automatic. So it can’t be guaranteed we’re “taking points off the board”. I assume that goes into Tom’s thinking.
The team and Coach Herman would probably say last years game was last year, but damn did that West Virginia game really make the blood boil.
Have a feeling our guys will be fired up for that game.
What am I looking at here?
Agree. This is what he needs to use some of the consultants/analysts for. We haven’t been good in 4th and short yardage against quality opponents.The thing with the book is this, if you are going to use it, that is a decision you make in the spring (it's like deciding to run a new offensive system) and, if you're gonna use it once, you have to use it all the time, that's the only way the math works out.
It seems like they might need to put in a little more film work on their 4th down package (and short yardage plays over all). Not knowing you're gonna get a cover 0 blitz vs your formation is inexcusable.