ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From the Weekend (Not since Colt McCoy in his prime in 2008...)

Aaron Ross, Michael Huff, Michael Griffin, Earl Thomas... name the all-timer that showed up and played at a high-level starter level in his very first season. Hint... he ain't in that group of names.
- hard for me to explain, but IMO we are going in the right direction, with forethought. Before it seemed like we were blindly wandering and we hoped we would succeed. I'll stay behind staff to the bitter end this year. HookEm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benflr
Aaron Ross, Michael Huff, Michael Griffin, Earl Thomas... name the all-timer that showed up and played at a high-level starter level in his very first season. Hint... he ain't in that group of names.
Didn’t Earl play as a frosh
 
The last 3 coaches for the o-line came in with praises of making a bad line good. Has Tx really recruited that bad on the o-line to were the last couple of coaches can't do anything with them?

I think you would see completely different results without the injuries... I believe we are down 8 or 9 or our top 11 o-line/TE players... that's hard to deal with...
 
you disagree?
I think the following things.

a. He has to play better.
b. He played the ball terribly on the long touchdown.
c. There's still a piece of clay that's worth molding and not giving up on. He's the guy quarterbacks are targeting and he has to come through the fire better for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benflr
Yes, but I don't know if you have a full grasp of what Texas is working with at every position.

We'll keep saying that the coaches need to make the offensive line better, but it's very unrealistic to believe that these coaches should be getting different types of results, given that most of the guys the coaches are counting on are not only very inexperienced and under-developed because of that inexperience, but are massive underdogs at becoming those types of players for a variety of reasons from the moment they step on to campus.

It's like being pissed because your wife can't turn water into wine, but Jesus once did. Basically, we're demanding magic tricks.

ON a larger picture, you're exactly right.... development must be much better.

I use these NFL Draft numbers as metrics because it takes opinion and confirmation bias out of the equation. It's just raw performance development data. You can do with the data what you will, but the math is the math. It's not telling you to correlate it with team success, yet I would argue the teams producing the most NFL talent are going to win the most games.

If Buffalo had produced 5 more draftable players like Mack per year over the course of a four or five year window, it's likely won a shit load of games.
I have a full grasp about the situation. Texas keeps signing players who are highly ranked, according to Rivals. The signing classes are typically ranked higher than the teams that are beating them, like TCU, Oklahoma State, West Virginia, Maryland, Kansas and Iowa State.

If the Rivals rankings are accurate, there is enough talent here to win. It's up to coaches to develop players, scheme to get the most of their talent and hide deficiencies, and create a winning program.

Lastly, how many of the teams ranked in the top 25 had higher ranked recruiting classes than Texas the past few seasons?

1. Alabama
2. Penn State
3. Georgia
4. TCU
5. Wisconsin
6. Ohio State
7. Clemson
8. Miami
9. Oklahoma
10. Oklahoma State
11. USC
12. Washington
13. Notre Dame
14. Virginia Tech
15. Washington State
16. USF
16. NC State
18. Michigan State
19. Michigan
20. UCF
21. Auburn
22. Stanford
23. West Virginia
24. LSU
25. Memphis

Coaching matters.
 
Obviously the running game is a problem, but I’m a half full guy because Herman and staff have taken a team with no running game and a true freshman QB and almost beat OU and USC, who have Heisman level QB’s and more overall top talent.

That’s pretty damn amazing when you think about.
 
Obviously the running game is a problem, but I’m a half full guy because Herman and staff have taken a team with no running game and a true freshman QB and almost beat OU and USC, who have Heisman level QB’s and more overall top talent.

That’s pretty damn amazing when you think about.

That's not glass half full. That's called reality. It's just not a popular thing here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaulieD
images

Ladies and gentlemen of Orangebloods, the glass is half full.​

I'm not here to sell you on a moral victory. To hell with that.

I'm not here to make you feel better about Texas losing a potentially season-defining game by letting it slip through its fingertips. To hell with that, too.

I'm here today to simply tell you how it is.

When this season started, there was one objective that stood above all others - find a quarterback. Period. After seven seasons of this program floundering at the only position in college football that really matters, the importance of answering this question emphatically, one way or another, couldn't be stressed enough.

You can't stress the importance of this matter enough because the program has remained in a holding pattern for nearly a decade, while the question remains an unsolved mystery.

Shane Buechele or Sam Ehlinger ... it didn't matter which one, but one of the two most definitely needed to emerge.

For the first 11 quarters of this season, the ship was still searching for a captain that wouldn't crash it under his helm, but in the 12th quarter of the season, the switch turned on for the true freshman from Westlake in exactly the way that a number of folks inside the program had been expecting since he arrived earlier in the year.

With 5:14 left on the clock in the fourth quarter, Ehlinger walked onto the field against USC with his team trailing by four points and the future of this program started to take off.

In the last 8+ quarters of action against USC, Kansas State and Oklahoma, here's what Ehlinger has compiled in terms of total offense: 59 of 105 for 803 passing yards, 5 touchdowns and a single interceptions, along with 223 yards rushing.

For those of you keeping score at home, Ehlinger has been rolling up more than 100 yards of total offense per quarter and in the last two games against the Wildcats and Sooners, he was the best and second-best player on the field, respectively.

I'll take it one step further. I'll go so far as to say that regardless of the mistakes that he's making, Ehlinger has produced the best 8+ quarters of continued action against quality teams that this program has seen since Colt McCoy was at his absolute best in October of 2008. With no running game help, a poor offensive line and up-and-down receiving play, the kid from Westlake that arrived exactly 20 years after the Longhorns passed over a kid named Drew Brees (because it was content with the added commitment of a guy named Major Applewhite) is starting to emerge as one of the Big 12's top impact players.

Ehlinger might not be ready for every moment he faces, but he's not afraid of any moment he's been in and this team is feeding off of his confidence.

Yes, this program has a multitude of sins that it commits every week all over the field, but the most important area of need and concern is being answered in an emphatically tremendous way.

No. 2 – The elephant in the room going into this week ...

I've been covering Texas football on a professional level for 23 years and I'm fully convinced that we're looking at the worst group of running backs and healthy offensive linemen I have ever seen in this program.

These dudes make Fozzy Whittaker and Chris Ogbonnaya look like Ricky Williams and Earl Campbell.

If you take out the San Jose State game, Sam Ehlinger has easily outgained Chris Warren and Kyle Porter, despite them having played in five times as many combined games.

The fact that both of these players lack game-breaking ability is one thing, but putting them behind a line that currently features one solid player makes this a perfect storm of horror shows colliding.

With half of the season already in the books, it's probably unlikely that these areas will improve significantly before the end of the season.

No. 3 – Understanding what a recruiting ranking means ...

It has turned into a life-long quest of mine to help everyone understand exactly what a recruiting ranking means, turning a pseudoscience into actual science, at least to the best degree that I can.

I'm unlikely to pull this off, if I'm being honest, but I'm going to continue to try ... in this column, in fact.

At its most simplistic level, here are the things you need to always remember.

a. Historical data shows that national top 75 players are on a night and day level distance apart from the rest of the pack when it comes to developing into difference-making players, the type that go on to be paid for their services after their college careers end.

b. Any prospect that isn't a national top 75-type player is much more likely to not end up as one of these types of players, with the likelihood of it happening decreasing wit every step down in the ranking levels.

It's as simple as these results from the most recently completed NFL Draft cycle, which produced these numbers (Percentage of players per recruiting tier drafted by NFL teams):

Five-star (6.1) prospects: a. 83.16-percent.
High-four star (6.0) prospects: 30.47-percent
Mid-four star (5.9) prospects: 15.79-percent
Low-four star (5.8) prospects: 16.03-percent
High-three star (5.7) prospects: 8.59-percent
Mid-three star (5.6) prospects: 6.57-percent
Low-three star (5.5) prospects: 4.37-percent
High-two star (5.4) prospects: 1.69-percent
Mid-two star (5.3) prospects: 1.35-percent
Low-two star (5.6) prospects: 1.29-percent

Imagine going to Las Vegas and volunteering to play casino games with the same possible payout as other games, but with much longer odds of winning. The goal is to get the best possible payoff with the most-likely chance at earning that return.

That's why recruiting matters. The better you recruit, the more likely you're landing a prospect who develops into an NFL player at twice, three times or four times the rates of other prospects ranked below them.

For a point of reference, let's take a look at the players on the current offensive depth chart at key positions that are struggling and the recruiting rankings/projected NFL upside they brought into the program:

Running backs

Chris Warren: 15.79-percent
Kyle Porter: 16.03-percent
Toneil Carter: 16.03-percent

Offensive linemen

Denzel Okafor - 16.03-percent
Derek Kerstetter - 8.59-percent
Tristan Nickelson - 1.35-percent
Patrick Vahe - 16.03-percent
Terrell Cuney - 6.57-percent
Zach Shackelford - 6.57-percent

The term five stars and four stars gets thrown around so much that it has created a misconception of what that kind of status means. There's not one player in the list of names above that arrived as a truly nationally-elite prospect, which means that none of them arrived with a historically projected type of NFL upside that was as high as 20-percent.

The goal in recruiting is to acquire as many of the highest upside players as possible so that the math works in your favor. If you've got a group of five national top-250 prospects, the national average says that you're probably going to get one NFL player from the group. The programs that win championships find a way to over-perform against the numbers, producing two or three NFL-level players from that same group of five.

What's hurting this program right now is that it not only isn't over-performing, but it is hasn't been hitting the national norms at these positions in a while.

Anwar Richardson wonders if he's supposed to believe that Texas is the unluckiest program in the country, but that's not really the discussion in place because there's nothing unlucky about kids with an 80-percent chance of being JAGs at best actually turning out to be JAGs. This is all about development and being able to create your own luck. Connor Williams is one of these kids that arrived with less than a 20-percent chance based on the numbers to develop into an NFL level player before he leaves college and if he's in the line-up, the Longhorns are essentially batting the national average in terms of expected development.

With this team not over-performing anywhere else on the line, taking his presence out of the line-up puts the Longhorns below the national norm at the moment, with all due respect to the fact that so many of these players are at the early stages of their individual developments. With a kid like Kerstetter, you're asking for a guy that arrived with a historical NFL development value under 10-percent to over-perform against a five-year snapshot within minutes of being on campus.

Ok, I'm going to move on. I hope this discussion made things clearer for at least one of you. One at a time, I'll continue my mission of education.

No. 4 - In case you're wondering ...

These are the following Texas players that arrived with a projected historical NFL development above 30 percent:

* Malik Jefferson (83.16-percent)
* Devin Duvernay (30.47-percent)
* Patrick Hudson (30.47-percent)
* Gary Johnson (30.47-percent)

The idea that this program is loaded with nationally elite talent that is floundering is untrue. This roster isn't anywhere near loaded with the type of talent that Mack Brown's best teams possessed, even if it does play in a conference where 90 percent of the teams would love to be working with UT's set of problems with regards to raw talent.

No. 5 – Going for it on fourth and eight ...

I get it. It's probably what I would have done.

The options in my mind in the moment broke down like this:

a. Attempt a field goal, knowing that even if you made it, you'd still need to force Oklahoma into a three-and-out and then get the ball back and potentially make a another field goal. Considering that making a field goal is a 50-50 proposition, you've got a 25-percent chance (at best) of using this scenario to win the game.

b. Go for it, knowing that you're probably looking at a 30-percent chance of success of converting, with the worst case situation being that you'd need to force an Oklahoma punt and score a touchdown in less than a minute with two timeouts.

c. Squib punt it with Ehlinger inside the 10-yard line and try to force Oklahoma into a three and out with a possible 50-yard drive task in front of you if you can force the three and out.

Honestly, people would have viewed punting from the 28-yard line as borderline crazy, but it's what I probably would have chosen to do, given the options. If I didn't have the guts to do it, I'm leaving the ball in the hands of my best player and not my inconsistent kicker.

No. 6 - Oklahoma State is everything ...

The season is on the line Saturday.

A win over Oklahoma State puts the Longhorns in a great spot to challenge for a spot in the Big 12 title game with five games to go.

A loss means the team dips below .500 with five games to go and qualifying for a bowl is probably a realistic goal.

The Texas staff has to do its best work of the season this week.

No. 7 – Buy or Sell …
buy_sell.jpg


BUY or SELL: UT has two OL starters next year who are NOT currently on campus?

(Sell) That's wishful, unrealistic thinking in my opinion. This is a young group and the hope has to be that with everyone returning, improvement will come from within.

BUY or SELL: Todd Orlando will FINALLY make the requisite adjustments AND PERSONNEL CHANGES in the Horn secondary to end this devastating repetition of coverage busts leading to killer passing TDs (as happened against Maryland, USC, Kansas St and OU)?

(Sell) The staff doesn't fully trust Davante Davis, at least not as much as Kris Boyd, who it only kind of trusts at this point. I think this staff is going to keep playing the guys it views as the best players and the coaches just have to coach them up to be better players.

BUY or SELL: Despite a 3-3 record, Tom Herman has done a very good job given the injuries sustained and strength of schedule being accounted for as well?

(Sell) He's done a fine job, not very fine. Nothing about 3-3 is very fine.

BUY or SELL: Someone other than Rowland kicks a FG this year?

(Sell) If Tom Herman felt like he had another option, he'd use that option. He's telling you everything you need to know by his actions.

BUY or SELL: My name is Collin Johnson and you cannot stop me coming over the middle from the slot receiver position?

(Sell) Tom Herman believes Johnson is a limited player in his development right now, limited to only a couple of routes from the outside.

BUY or SELL: Texas Tech fires Kliff Kingsbury after the season and he immediately becomes the new Texas offensive coordinator?

(Sell) Tech needs to keep Kliff and hope he eventually develops onto half the guy they want him to be. What's the other option?

BUY or SELL: We make a bowl game, call it now.

(Buy) I'm seeing a 7-5 mark.

BUY or SELL: Texas wins if Sam Ehlinger hits Duvernay in stride for a TD instead of leading him out of bounds?

(Sell) Man, you guys love to nitpick a freshman quarterback with the nit-pickiest things.

BUY or SELL: Texas recruiting turns to the trenches and completes this class with nothing but linemen (other than Cook)?

(Sell) Sorry, man.

No. 8 – If I had a vote that counts ...

1. Alabama
2. Penn State
3. Georgia
4. TCU
5. Wisconsin
6. Oklahoma
7. Ohio State
8. Oklahoma State
9. Miami
10. USC

No. 9 – Eternal Randomness of the Spotty Sports Mind …

... I'm guessing Clemson fans think their team playing on Friday nights is every bit as Mickey Mouse as Alex Dunlap thinks Texas playing on Thursday night is.

... It's Alabama and everyone else at the moment.

... Arkansas' 2-4 start is borderline erotic.

... What the hell happened to the teams from the state of Washington this week?

... TCU is damn good.

... Just when it looked like Texas Tech was turning a corner as a program, it ran into a wall. Man, I can't imagine what Orangebloods would look like in the aftermath of a loss like the one the Red Raiders had on Saturday. Actually, I can imagine ... what am I talking about?

... The Packers are F'd.

... Leonard Fournette is saving Anwar's fantasy season.

... I expect Sunday to be as it good as it gets for Adrian Peterson. Little bit of fool's gold there, IMO.

... Man, the NFL just is as average as I have ever seen it. I'm not even sure if the league has a very good team, let alone a great one.

... I think my favorite weekend of the NFL season is the week the Cowboys have a bye.

... Shout to my guy Malcolm Brown, the former Texas running back, who the current coaching staff would shank an inmate over if it meant getting him back on the 40 Acres. Not only did Brown record his first touchdown of the season with a recovered blocked punt in the end zone, but he averaged 5.7 yards per carry in support of Todd Gurley in a win for the Rams. Keep grinding, Malcolm.

... Man City not only looks like the best team in the EPL by a decent margin, but that team looks like a Champion's League threat.

... Oh, what I wouldn't give to have Naby Keita on this Liverpool team right now. I feel like Liverpool wins that game if he's pulling the strings in the middle of the field.

... The Astros are going to win the World Series, aren't they? And they'll have done so by going through baseball royalty in the Red Sox, Yankees and Dodgers/Cubs. Just thinking out loud.

No. 10 – And finally …

Love the commitment of Houston Lamar defensive back D'Shawn Jamison, a guy that I think has a little Nate Vasher in him as a college prospect.

Versatility, playmaking and a belief at all times that he's the best player on the field - Jamison brings all of that to the table.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him play as a true freshman. This program won't be lacking athletes for the foreseeable future.
 
I agree with that Anwar. I think the coaching staff needs to a better job of developing what they have as well. I hope our current coaching staff can exceed any national averages and I'd be happy with good college play out if them. We don't necessarily need NFL level play.
I literally don't know a single person that doesn't believe the coaching staff needs to improve the development of its players. It's to what level of development that is needed that I tried to bring some insight on.
 
@GKKetch

I don't know if it's sour grapes or negativity, or what--- but our player output/development doesn't seem to match the normal outcomes vis a vis star ratings.

I'd like to see Ketch do a star rating where he compares Texas players to average "outputs" vs. other teams' players star ratings.

It seems like Texas misses a lot more on talent than other teams do---maybe that's a false fact from an angry fan--but i really wonder.
Over the last decade, Texas has under-developed its talent. It's not super significant as the record would,but when you're not over-performing against the numbers, it catches up to you fast.
 
But yet you keep missing the point. Anwar, I believe, and others are saying that our competition has lower talent, even according to recruiting rankings, but yet are producing better results. Do you disagree with his premise?
There's literally nothing about that point that needs to be missed.

No shit.;)

I'm suggesting and detailing why the conversation is a little deeper and nuanced than that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaulieD
This is what should bother us as fans more than anything. We continue to get our asses handed to us by Patterson year after year while he can't beat us head to head for one kid. Hard to wrap your mind around.
Not really. It can be explained in 25 words.

The margins to which UT outperforms TCU in recruiting is exaggerated because once you get beyond the top 75 nationally, there are more subtle differences in the tiers of recruits. Patterson develops at an elite level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benflr
Where did the Collin Johnson is limited narrative even come from??? Tom Herman and OB have been high on him up until recently. Hell off-season reports damn near made him sound NFL ready. O line making Sam have to run for his life is the main reason for him not getting the ball imo

All you have to do is watch Colin Johnson to come to the exact same conclusion.
 
Other teams are not going to allow Sam to be one man wrecking ball. I don't know who Gundy has as DC, but Patterson @ TCU is gonna spy Ehlinger at the very least.

Our offense needs to find some other options. Being a one trick pony will not get us in a bowl game.

Maybe we scrap and scrape and play with passion, but we will continue to lose by 3-10 points if we don't improve on offense. And by improving, i don't mean 30 carries for Ehlinger.... the guy had 20 carries vs. OU.... that is not sustainable.

Then what do YOU propose with the O line and these backs? The Annexation of Bolivia play from Little Giants?
 
I agree with that Anwar. I think the coaching staff needs to a better job of developing what they have as well. I hope our current coaching staff can exceed any national averages and I'd be happy with good college play out if them. We don't necessarily need NFL level play.
I think it’s important, at least his year, to exclude highly rated players who are not playing (transfer or injured) or are true freshmen to gage whether this staff is developing players. Especially after just half of one season! Beck and Williams going down we’re absolutely devastating dominoes that have resulted in a rag-tag group on the OL that is either young or just bad. You can’t fault this staff for that or expect that group to play above their heads this early. We all knew that our OL and DL were going to be key to our success and this, couldn’t sustain any major injuries. But here we are. The development of this OL next year will be a more reasonable barometer of this staff’s ability. But now I’m worried about how thin we will be at DL. Wake me in 3 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benflr
The headlines from last year are remarkably similar. OU holds off game UT team that gave highly-ranked Sooners all they could handle. In process, UT found its QB, Shane Buchehe, who scorched the Sooners for three touchdowns etc, etc...

Different year, same tune.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DUANETB
Obviously, some coaches like Gary Patterson are able to beat the odds by shrewd selection and development. There was a piece about him and his penchant for recruiting running backs and converting them to other positions, like he did with the future NFL DE Jerry Hughes. Aside from the ability to pick and develop, I would love to see you do an analysis of coaches who improve their odds by clearing scholarships. It may be true that a particular player has X percentage chance of making it into the league based upon his star rating, but two players of the same rating give the coach a 2X probability. Forgetting the morality or repetitional harm and looking at it in a purely linear fashion, wouldn't a coach be able to theoretically find several NFL starters with two and three stars if he were to make it a habit of pulling scholarships (encouraging transfers, etc.) when a player doesn't show promise after a season? And while it may be true that you need several NFL talents to compete at the highest level, isn't it true that you also need loads of near misses who can be found amongst two stars through the combing through process? Do you see any coaches out there who you believe implement this strategy to a noticeable degree?
 
When does JT take over the other CB spot? Have to think it happens before season end.
 
I can't see you come up with "a program whose top 22 that could play with anyone." Is Ketchum the only one who provides a clear picture of our current team. We have weaknesses all through the line-up; formerly second and third string offensive linemen starting, a freshman tight end, second tier running backs, etc. If this represents the general misguided perspective most readers of the website have, i don't know if there will ever be a coach that will placate them.

Um, That's quote from current UT head coach.
 
The headlines from last year are remarkably similar. OU holds off game UT team that gave highly-ranked Sooners all they could handle. In process, UT found its QB, Shane Buchehe, who scorched the Sooners for three touchdowns etc, etc...

Different year, same tune.
Same narrative. True. But you can’t just look at that and say nothing has changed.
 
I have a full grasp about the situation. Texas keeps signing players who are highly ranked, according to Rivals. The signing classes are typically ranked higher than the teams that are beating them, like TCU, Oklahoma State, West Virginia, Maryland, Kansas and Iowa State.

If the Rivals rankings are accurate, there is enough talent here to win. It's up to coaches to develop players, scheme to get the most of their talent and hide deficiencies, and create a winning program.

Lastly, how many of the teams ranked in the top 25 had higher ranked recruiting classes than Texas the past few seasons?

You are forgetting the major point: development. Charlie did NOT do that. Now you expect Herman to come in and have a championship O line when there was zero development going on. Add to that the injuries and I think you must be expecting some of that pixie dust magic. Be better.
 
The headlines from last year are remarkably similar. OU holds off game UT team that gave highly-ranked Sooners all they could handle. In process, UT found its QB, Shane Buchehe, who scorched the Sooners for three touchdowns etc, etc...

Different year, same tune.

I don;'t believe a single person last year believed that Texas had defiantly found it's QB.
 
images

Ladies and gentlemen of Orangebloods, the glass is half full.​

I'm not here to sell you on a moral victory. To hell with that.

I'm not here to make you feel better about Texas losing a potentially season-defining game by letting it slip through its fingertips. To hell with that, too.

I'm here today to simply tell you how it is.

When this season started, there was one objective that stood above all others - find a quarterback. Period. After seven seasons of this program floundering at the only position in college football that really matters, the importance of answering this question emphatically, one way or another, couldn't be stressed enough.

You can't stress the importance of this matter enough because the program has remained in a holding pattern for nearly a decade, while the question remains an unsolved mystery.

Shane Buechele or Sam Ehlinger ... it didn't matter which one, but one of the two most definitely needed to emerge.

For the first 11 quarters of this season, the ship was still searching for a captain that wouldn't crash it under his helm, but in the 12th quarter of the season, the switch turned on for the true freshman from Westlake in exactly the way that a number of folks inside the program had been expecting since he arrived earlier in the year.

With 5:14 left on the clock in the fourth quarter, Ehlinger walked onto the field against USC with his team trailing by four points and the future of this program started to take off.

In the last 8+ quarters of action against USC, Kansas State and Oklahoma, here's what Ehlinger has compiled in terms of total offense: 59 of 105 for 803 passing yards, 5 touchdowns and a single interceptions, along with 223 yards rushing.

For those of you keeping score at home, Ehlinger has been rolling up more than 100 yards of total offense per quarter and in the last two games against the Wildcats and Sooners, he was the best and second-best player on the field, respectively.

I'll take it one step further. I'll go so far as to say that regardless of the mistakes that he's making, Ehlinger has produced the best 8+ quarters of continued action against quality teams that this program has seen since Colt McCoy was at his absolute best in October of 2008. With no running game help, a poor offensive line and up-and-down receiving play, the kid from Westlake that arrived exactly 20 years after the Longhorns passed over a kid named Drew Brees (because it was content with the added commitment of a guy named Major Applewhite) is starting to emerge as one of the Big 12's top impact players.

Ehlinger might not be ready for every moment he faces, but he's not afraid of any moment he's been in and this team is feeding off of his confidence.

Yes, this program has a multitude of sins that it commits every week all over the field, but the most important area of need and concern is being answered in an emphatically tremendous way.

No. 2 – The elephant in the room going into this week ...

I've been covering Texas football on a professional level for 23 years and I'm fully convinced that we're looking at the worst group of running backs and healthy offensive linemen I have ever seen in this program.

These dudes make Fozzy Whittaker and Chris Ogbonnaya look like Ricky Williams and Earl Campbell.

If you take out the San Jose State game, Sam Ehlinger has easily outgained Chris Warren and Kyle Porter, despite them having played in five times as many combined games.

The fact that both of these players lack game-breaking ability is one thing, but putting them behind a line that currently features one solid player makes this a perfect storm of horror shows colliding.

With half of the season already in the books, it's probably unlikely that these areas will improve significantly before the end of the season.

No. 3 – Understanding what a recruiting ranking means ...

It has turned into a life-long quest of mine to help everyone understand exactly what a recruiting ranking means, turning a pseudoscience into actual science, at least to the best degree that I can.

I'm unlikely to pull this off, if I'm being honest, but I'm going to continue to try ... in this column, in fact.

At its most simplistic level, here are the things you need to always remember.

a. Historical data shows that national top 75 players are on a night and day level distance apart from the rest of the pack when it comes to developing into difference-making players, the type that go on to be paid for their services after their college careers end.

b. Any prospect that isn't a national top 75-type player is much more likely to not end up as one of these types of players, with the likelihood of it happening decreasing wit every step down in the ranking levels.

It's as simple as these results from the most recently completed NFL Draft cycle, which produced these numbers (Percentage of players per recruiting tier drafted by NFL teams):

Five-star (6.1) prospects: a. 83.16-percent.
High-four star (6.0) prospects: 30.47-percent
Mid-four star (5.9) prospects: 15.79-percent
Low-four star (5.8) prospects: 16.03-percent
High-three star (5.7) prospects: 8.59-percent
Mid-three star (5.6) prospects: 6.57-percent
Low-three star (5.5) prospects: 4.37-percent
High-two star (5.4) prospects: 1.69-percent
Mid-two star (5.3) prospects: 1.35-percent
Low-two star (5.6) prospects: 1.29-percent

Imagine going to Las Vegas and volunteering to play casino games with the same possible payout as other games, but with much longer odds of winning. The goal is to get the best possible payoff with the most-likely chance at earning that return.

That's why recruiting matters. The better you recruit, the more likely you're landing a prospect who develops into an NFL player at twice, three times or four times the rates of other prospects ranked below them.

For a point of reference, let's take a look at the players on the current offensive depth chart at key positions that are struggling and the recruiting rankings/projected NFL upside they brought into the program:

Running backs

Chris Warren: 15.79-percent
Kyle Porter: 16.03-percent
Toneil Carter: 16.03-percent

Offensive linemen

Denzel Okafor - 16.03-percent
Derek Kerstetter - 8.59-percent
Tristan Nickelson - 1.35-percent
Patrick Vahe - 16.03-percent
Terrell Cuney - 6.57-percent
Zach Shackelford - 6.57-percent

The term five stars and four stars gets thrown around so much that it has created a misconception of what that kind of status means. There's not one player in the list of names above that arrived as a truly nationally-elite prospect, which means that none of them arrived with a historically projected type of NFL upside that was as high as 20-percent.

The goal in recruiting is to acquire as many of the highest upside players as possible so that the math works in your favor. If you've got a group of five national top-250 prospects, the national average says that you're probably going to get one NFL player from the group. The programs that win championships find a way to over-perform against the numbers, producing two or three NFL-level players from that same group of five.

What's hurting this program right now is that it not only isn't over-performing, but it is hasn't been hitting the national norms at these positions in a while.

Anwar Richardson wonders if he's supposed to believe that Texas is the unluckiest program in the country, but that's not really the discussion in place because there's nothing unlucky about kids with an 80-percent chance of being JAGs at best actually turning out to be JAGs. This is all about development and being able to create your own luck. Connor Williams is one of these kids that arrived with less than a 20-percent chance based on the numbers to develop into an NFL level player before he leaves college and if he's in the line-up, the Longhorns are essentially batting the national average in terms of expected development.

With this team not over-performing anywhere else on the line, taking his presence out of the line-up puts the Longhorns below the national norm at the moment, with all due respect to the fact that so many of these players are at the early stages of their individual developments. With a kid like Kerstetter, you're asking for a guy that arrived with a historical NFL development value under 10-percent to over-perform against a five-year snapshot within minutes of being on campus.

Ok, I'm going to move on. I hope this discussion made things clearer for at least one of you. One at a time, I'll continue my mission of education.

No. 4 - In case you're wondering ...

These are the following Texas players that arrived with a projected historical NFL development above 30 percent:

* Malik Jefferson (83.16-percent)
* Devin Duvernay (30.47-percent)
* Patrick Hudson (30.47-percent)
* Gary Johnson (30.47-percent)

The idea that this program is loaded with nationally elite talent that is floundering is untrue. This roster isn't anywhere near loaded with the type of talent that Mack Brown's best teams possessed, even if it does play in a conference where 90 percent of the teams would love to be working with UT's set of problems with regards to raw talent.

No. 5 – Going for it on fourth and eight ...

I get it. It's probably what I would have done.

The options in my mind in the moment broke down like this:

a. Attempt a field goal, knowing that even if you made it, you'd still need to force Oklahoma into a three-and-out and then get the ball back and potentially make a another field goal. Considering that making a field goal is a 50-50 proposition, you've got a 25-percent chance (at best) of using this scenario to win the game.

b. Go for it, knowing that you're probably looking at a 30-percent chance of success of converting, with the worst case situation being that you'd need to force an Oklahoma punt and score a touchdown in less than a minute with two timeouts.

c. Squib punt it with Ehlinger inside the 10-yard line and try to force Oklahoma into a three and out with a possible 50-yard drive task in front of you if you can force the three and out.

Honestly, people would have viewed punting from the 28-yard line as borderline crazy, but it's what I probably would have chosen to do, given the options. If I didn't have the guts to do it, I'm leaving the ball in the hands of my best player and not my inconsistent kicker.

No. 6 - Oklahoma State is everything ...

The season is on the line Saturday.

A win over Oklahoma State puts the Longhorns in a great spot to challenge for a spot in the Big 12 title game with five games to go.

A loss means the team dips below .500 with five games to go and qualifying for a bowl is probably a realistic goal.

The Texas staff has to do its best work of the season this week.

No. 7 – Buy or Sell …
buy_sell.jpg


BUY or SELL: UT has two OL starters next year who are NOT currently on campus?

(Sell) That's wishful, unrealistic thinking in my opinion. This is a young group and the hope has to be that with everyone returning, improvement will come from within.

BUY or SELL: Todd Orlando will FINALLY make the requisite adjustments AND PERSONNEL CHANGES in the Horn secondary to end this devastating repetition of coverage busts leading to killer passing TDs (as happened against Maryland, USC, Kansas St and OU)?

(Sell) The staff doesn't fully trust Davante Davis, at least not as much as Kris Boyd, who it only kind of trusts at this point. I think this staff is going to keep playing the guys it views as the best players and the coaches just have to coach them up to be better players.

BUY or SELL: Despite a 3-3 record, Tom Herman has done a very good job given the injuries sustained and strength of schedule being accounted for as well?

(Sell) He's done a fine job, not very fine. Nothing about 3-3 is very fine.

BUY or SELL: Someone other than Rowland kicks a FG this year?

(Sell) If Tom Herman felt like he had another option, he'd use that option. He's telling you everything you need to know by his actions.

BUY or SELL: My name is Collin Johnson and you cannot stop me coming over the middle from the slot receiver position?

(Sell) Tom Herman believes Johnson is a limited player in his development right now, limited to only a couple of routes from the outside.

BUY or SELL: Texas Tech fires Kliff Kingsbury after the season and he immediately becomes the new Texas offensive coordinator?

(Sell) Tech needs to keep Kliff and hope he eventually develops onto half the guy they want him to be. What's the other option?

BUY or SELL: We make a bowl game, call it now.

(Buy) I'm seeing a 7-5 mark.

BUY or SELL: Texas wins if Sam Ehlinger hits Duvernay in stride for a TD instead of leading him out of bounds?

(Sell) Man, you guys love to nitpick a freshman quarterback with the nit-pickiest things.

BUY or SELL: Texas recruiting turns to the trenches and completes this class with nothing but linemen (other than Cook)?

(Sell) Sorry, man.

No. 8 – If I had a vote that counts ...

1. Alabama
2. Penn State
3. Georgia
4. TCU
5. Wisconsin
6. Oklahoma
7. Ohio State
8. Oklahoma State
9. Miami
10. USC

No. 9 – Eternal Randomness of the Spotty Sports Mind …

... I'm guessing Clemson fans think their team playing on Friday nights is every bit as Mickey Mouse as Alex Dunlap thinks Texas playing on Thursday night is.

... It's Alabama and everyone else at the moment.

... Arkansas' 2-4 start is borderline erotic.

... What the hell happened to the teams from the state of Washington this week?

... TCU is damn good.

... Just when it looked like Texas Tech was turning a corner as a program, it ran into a wall. Man, I can't imagine what Orangebloods would look like in the aftermath of a loss like the one the Red Raiders had on Saturday. Actually, I can imagine ... what am I talking about?

... The Packers are F'd.

... Leonard Fournette is saving Anwar's fantasy season.

... I expect Sunday to be as it good as it gets for Adrian Peterson. Little bit of fool's gold there, IMO.

... Man, the NFL just is as average as I have ever seen it. I'm not even sure if the league has a very good team, let alone a great one.

... I think my favorite weekend of the NFL season is the week the Cowboys have a bye.

... Shout to my guy Malcolm Brown, the former Texas running back, who the current coaching staff would shank an inmate over if it meant getting him back on the 40 Acres. Not only did Brown record his first touchdown of the season with a recovered blocked punt in the end zone, but he averaged 5.7 yards per carry in support of Todd Gurley in a win for the Rams. Keep grinding, Malcolm.

... Man City not only looks like the best team in the EPL by a decent margin, but that team looks like a Champion's League threat.

... Oh, what I wouldn't give to have Naby Keita on this Liverpool team right now. I feel like Liverpool wins that game if he's pulling the strings in the middle of the field.

... The Astros are going to win the World Series, aren't they? And they'll have done so by going through baseball royalty in the Red Sox, Yankees and Dodgers/Cubs. Just thinking out loud.

No. 10 – And finally …

Love the commitment of Houston Lamar defensive back D'Shawn Jamison, a guy that I think has a little Nate Vasher in him as a college prospect.

Versatility, playmaking and a belief at all times that he's the best player on the field - Jamison brings all of that to the table.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him play as a true freshman. This program won't be lacking athletes for the foreseeable future.
Can you rank the current verbal commitment s with NFL probabilities and if we signed the class today where would that compare to the classes signed since 2008?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT