Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am simply offering an alternative perspective to yours. You seem convinced that they are trustworthy here and I am explaining why they are not. They have yet to actually say or show anything of substance that would make me believe they actually have substantial evidence. If they really have something then he should receive much more punishment than a suspension, put his ass in jail.You don't know what they have, none of us really do, but you're convinced they absolutely can only do so with bias.
I'm not sure that is an objective position.
I shouldn't be, but I'm shocked at some of the commentary in this thread.
An opinion isn't proof. The police also had an issue with the girl.The police believe he did abuse her.
Medical experts did as well.
he panel it put together did as well.
Again, there is all kinds of mess to sort through, as I've conceded numerous times. At the end of the day, they overwhelmingly believe he abused her.
When you continue to lower your own bar, don't be shocked when you are called out. You claim to be reserving judgment in this case, siting a lack of credible / trustworthy parties, when it is completely clear that you have an agenda (as always). Zeke just gives you another podium. Disgusting, indeed.
Link to where the police made a statement that they believe Zeke abused her at any point, as you stated earlier? Guess that must be dismissed in the suspension of the investigation.
Pretty much.Pretty sad isn't it? If you offer up any commentary other than suggesting Zeke is guilty of beating this woman, then you are in the wrong.
Pretty sad isn't it? If you offer up any commentary other than suggesting Zeke is guilty of beating this woman, then you are in the wrong.
No. 7 – The bottom line for me on Zeke Elliott ...
Man, I want to believe that the best player on my all-time favorite team isn't an abuser of women.
As someone that has been a fan of America's Team since I was basically old enough to have memories, the last thing I want to have to deal with is the reality that the player that makes the entire team go is the kind of human being that puts his hands on a woman in a physically violent way.
I want to believe in someone in this story, especially Elliott, but the reality is that there's no one to believe in.
My words aren't the words of some radical Social Justice Warrior, as some would want to suggest in an effort to marginalize the importance of the situation. My words are those of a person whose feelings on domestic abuse aren't connected to whether the alleged aggressor is on my favorite team or not.
As it stands, Zeke Elliott has given me zero reason to believe in his word or honor. Until he can do so, I'd rather not hear anyone's complaints about whether the NFL has or hasn't been fair to him.
An opinion isn't proof.
if the NFL conducted an investigation and it is their opinion he beat his gf they can do whatever they want to him. they don't have to have definitive proof like the court. how is this so hard for yall to understand
who has said the NFL CANT suspend him? Obviously they can under the CBA. That's a different issue than if it's the right thing to do. From reports today this is likely to get bloody with an appeal and legal case. Absent the NFL releasing some sort of magic evidence the police and district attorney never had access to (unlikely) that proves zeke abused someone I will continue to think he shouldn't have been suspended because there are just too many question marks all over this and the accuser is a total mess who isn't trustworthyif the NFL conducted an investigation and it is their opinion he beat his gf they can do whatever they want to him. they don't have to have definitive proof like the court. how is this so hard for yall to understand
1. That's the baseline it seems. I can't really answer the question.If the NFL has overwhelming evidence that Zeke was routinely beating his girlfriend:
1.) Why only a 6 game suspension?
2.) Why didn't they turn the evidence over to the DA so they could prosecute him?
I'd argue you don't need to see any part of a game that has the pre-season label. Those games are always such a let down and they reveal almost nothing. They are only good to see a kid from your favorite college get in a few plays at TE before the team is forced to cut him.First drive is when the best players play come on man. That's all I need to see until the 3rd preseason game.
a. I have said the NFL isn't credible and has trustworthy issues about 100 times in this thread, so no, I haven't said they are trustworthy.I am simply offering an alternative perspective to yours. You seem convinced that they are trustworthy here and I am explaining why they are not. They have yet to actually say or show anything of substance that would make me believe they actually have substantial evidence. If they really have something then he should receive much more punishment than a suspension, put his ass in jail.
Side note, his father apparently sent some stuff out and it appears that this is about to get ugly.
How do we know the NFL believes it happened? Perhaps they are simply taking the easy "anti-domestic abuse" position. The NFL could be pushing an agenda.and yet, the NFL believes it happened and Elliott has provided or attempted to provide any reasonable explanations. I can't turn away from that. None of us should.
It is the NFL's report that investigators told the NFL they believed he abused her.When you continue to lower your own bar, don't be shocked when you are called out. You claim to be reserving judgment in this case, siting a lack of credible / trustworthy parties, when it is completely clear that you have an agenda (as always). Zeke just gives you another podium. Disgusting, indeed.
Link to where the police made a statement that they believe Zeke abused her at any point, as you stated earlier? Guess that must be dismissed in the suspension of the investigation.
I find this to be absurd. You literally don't know what the NFL in terms of evidence, yet you are convinced it has nothing based on ... I don't know.I don't know for sure if he didn't or did do something but neither does the NFL
a. I have said the NFL isn't credible and has trustworthy issues about 100 times in this thread, so no, I haven't said they are trustworthy.
b. Do those bruises on her body that don't really have a good explanation other than abuse at this point do nothing for you?
Does it?
Pretty much. Her friend confirmed she got beat up by some chick. That was the same night she was allegedly attacked not sure what the NFL is doing, but they better have a whole lot more than those pictures.Does it?
I find this to be absurd. You literally don't know what the NFL in terms of evidence, yet you are convinced it has nothing based on ... I don't know.
The NFL has interviewed dozens of people and has seen tons of electronic messaging. I'm going to advise you that you aren't seeing the full picture.Pretty much. Her friend confirmed she got beat up by some chick. The same night not sure what the NFL is doing, but the better have a whole lot more than those pictures.
You seem to be making a habit of pretending some things exists and some things don't.Absent them releasing information showing differently why would I believe a questionable organization that is just a freaking pro sports league has access to more evidence than law professionals had and district attorney? This isn't the FBI. It's a dumbass league office that's been a mess for years.
Sorry, I just don't take the NFLs word for it. They have been too inconsistent far too many times to be trusted in that manner.
We also know the district attorney (despite what they may have wanted to believe) released specific information to the general public that only aimed to cast doubt on the accusers validity and painted her in a bad light.
That and we have witness accounts that don't back her up and multiple texts showing her pretty clearly trying to set zeke up. We supposed to pretend that doesn't exist?
What're you basing your stance from? We all have the same information that's been made public. I was strictly referring to the bruises from the pictures you referred to that didn't have a good explanation other than abuse. Obviously that's not the case at all.The NFL has interviewed dozens of people and has seen tons of electronic messaging. I'm going to advise you that you aren't seeing the full picture.
None of us have.
Likely true, but that really means nothing. You are simply making an assumption as to what they learned, beyond what the public knows.The NFL has interviewed dozens of people and has seen tons of electronic messaging. I'm going to advise you that you aren't seeing the full picture.
None of us have.
Did @Ketchum say that? If so, he is way off base. Those bruises do more to muddy the water than clear anything up.What're you basing your stance from? We all have the same information that's been made publicl. I was strictly referring to the bruises from the pictures you referred to that didn't have a good explanation other than abuse. Obviously that's not the case at all.
Speaking of carrying on a march, you would appear to be carrying on with your own. Leave that SJW shit somewhere else. It's a non-issue here.
This is about paying attention to and caring about the abuse of women.
If that's a SJW issue in your mind, then we've really fallen as a society.
Until he can do so, I'd rather not hear anyone's complaints about whether the NFL has or hasn't been fair to him.
What you posted doesn't completely do what you think it does.What're you basing your stance from? We all have the same information that's been made public. I was strictly referring to the bruises from the pictures you referred to that didn't have a good explanation other than abuse. Obviously that's not the case at all.