ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend (Continuing my crusade!!!!!)

You haven’t but you have spent several years analyzing 6.1s and 6.0s vs 3 stars including this OP. I have not seen an in depth analysis on how the programs do develop 3 stars better than Texas.

In addition my question is why can’t OUR PROGRAM DO BOTH? I was not asking you why both is impossible because I don’t think it is. Not every post is an attack on you…promise.
I didn't take it as an attack on me.

I just gave my response to it.

The "how" its done is the mystery secret sauce. It requires a lot of patience and good coaching and an elite strength and conditioning program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOLIO
Would certainly mean that what sark is doing on his takes at the moment would actually be spot on - if he had confidence in it coming true of course

Then the undersized DE / the Louisiana TE and the low percentage but large bodied high upside OL takes would all be perfect in both your and my book - some to help land bigger fish / some that have the right profile to really hit when they do
There's way less buzz about that happening than the 25 man going away.

But, this is unchartered territory.
 
yeah, but we're not exactly talking about the sport in a vacuum. We're talking about a program that wants to compete at the highest levels possible.

Obviously. And that’s not unique to Texas. Of course, any coach is going to attempt to bring in the best possible players available. But available is the key word. First, there are only so many NFL-caliber players available. Second, some coaches/schools cannot attract the very best players they desire. Third, some times evaluations of players are flawed.

In terms of the relevancy of “star” rankings done by recruiting services, they are entertaining and often reflective of a player’s potential. But i think it is safe to say that actual coaches are every bit as good evaluators of talent as say, you, if not better (at least as far as their needs/fit). Of course, again, there is only so much talent available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gregory I
But i think it is safe to say that actual coaches are every bit as good evaluators of talent as say, you, if not better (at least as far as their needs/fit). Of course, again, there is only so much talent available.

Coaches and the services have roughly the same success rate. They go hand in hand.

One doesn't get off the hook because the other is on it. Both fail significantly more than they hit.
 
Coaches and the services have roughly the same success rate. They go hand in hand.

One doesn't get off the hook because the other is on it. Both fail significantly more than they hit.

That’s not surprising at all. The recruiting services, particularly these days, are pretty sophisticated.
 
The percentage of 3 stars at Texas that don't see the field and graduate from Texas will tell you a lot about why three stars come to Texas.

I believe that it is greater than 50%. If it is, they came here for the education and not for the NFL.
No way it's greater than 50%. A decade ago, yes. Not in 2022.
 
Question for @Ketchum. Is NIL money a big pool of capital similar to a salary cap or a budget, or do the donors want to maintain discretion about who does what and where it goes?
 
I think the main point @Ketchum is making is that big championship aspiring programs like Texas should take players that have a higher chance of developing into NFL caliber players because those are the players that bring National Championships to your program. 3 stars still have worth but it's better for a program like Texas to let other teams develop them and then poach them in the portal. You're still going to need role players and such as you are correctly pointing out but teams like Texas shouldn't be taking high school freshman to be role players. With the portal and eliminating the 25 scholarship cap, developed role players can be easily found along with studs. The next few years are going to shake up a lot of fans that are holding on too dearly for the way things used to be.
Ryan,

I am not actually disagreeing with the general direction Ketch is suggesting for the FUTURE of college football recruiting NOW that the portal gates have been thrown wide open and with NIL. I am contesting his historical evaluations of players and their "worth" to a team and "value" as a prospect based SOLELY on whether or not the player got drafted, and using that a measuring stick to wheter or not a 3 Star or Low-Mid 4 Star is a good get these days or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gregory I
Show me the numbers and names. I'm sure you have them. 😁

From just the DT haul...

2003 Thomas Marshall, 2004 Derek Lokey, 2006 Ben Alexander, 2007 Tyrell Higgins, 2007 Michael Wilcoxon, 2010 Deaires Cotton, 2012 Brandon Moore, 2012 Alex Norman, 2014 Chris Nelson, 2014 Poona Ford, 2015 Du'Vonta Lampkin, 2016 Jordan Elliott, 2016 Gerald Wilbon, 2016 Marcel Southall

I think only 1 or 2 of the last 6 have graduated.

The three-stars are just coming in and out of the program with too much speed these days.
 
Ryan,

I am not actually disagreeing with the general direction Ketch is suggesting for the FUTURE of college football recruiting NOW that the portal gates have been thrown wide open and with NIL. I am contesting his historical evaluations of players and their "worth" to a team and "value" as a prospect based SOLELY on whether or not the player got drafted, and using that a measuring stick to wheter or not a 3 Star or Low-Mid 4 Star is a good get these days or not.
The thing is.,.. other than Poona Ford, Lil'Jordan Humphrey and a couple of others, who are you standing on the table for as quality players?

The problem isn't that these guys aren't getting credit for their contributions, it's that they were asked to contribute too much in the first place.
 
The first players to wash out of the 2022 class that Sark signed weren't the difference makers. It was the three stars.

See David Abiria.
But wait, he was a DE who was 6'4" and 245 lbs - he is supposed to have a 50% shot at being NFL drafted according to your research, right??? ;-)
 
But wait, he was a DE who was 6'4" and 245 lbs - he is supposed to have a 50% shot at being NFL drafted according to your research, right??? ;-)

That data doesn't apply to mid-three star players.


But, I like the attempt. ;)
 
Colt was still either the No.1 or No.2 quarterback in the state. The value of such things was not known in 2005.

Feels like cave man years. ;)

that's correct, Colt was certainly not an unheralded recruit. he still owns the 2A passing record and is 4th overall. he was a first team All-State selection and led Jim Ned to the 2003 2A title game losing to San Augustine.

one other thing stats can't predict, McCoy is a good person. character matters. McCoy was one player Mack Brown never worried about when he went to sleep at night.
 
that's correct, Colt was certainly not an unheralded recruit. he still owns the 2A passing record and is 4th overall. he was a first team All-State selection and led Jim Ned to the 2003 2A title game losing to San Augustine.

one other thing stats can't predict, McCoy is a good person. character matters. McCoy was one player Mack Brown never worried about when he went to sleep at night.
He and Chase Daniel were a hell of a 1-2 punch in that year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SR60
I don't think it's worthwhile to connect star ratings in highschool to being drafted in the NFL.

A significant part of a star rating in highschool is a reflection of physical / speed superiority over "highschool" players...

In the NFL most rookies will be physically inferior to those in the same position.

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jerome in the House
Ryan,

I am not actually disagreeing with the general direction Ketch is suggesting for the FUTURE of college football recruiting NOW that the portal gates have been thrown wide open and with NIL. I am contesting his historical evaluations of players and their "worth" to a team and "value" as a prospect based SOLELY on whether or not the player got drafted, and using that a measuring stick to wheter or not a 3 Star or Low-Mid 4 Star is a good get these days or not.
Would you rather have a 3 or low tier 4 star freshman take a roster spot who has a 1 in 10 chance of developing into a NFL prospect over a college sophomore that's shown he can play at the college level and manage school and everything else that goes along with it? Which do you think is going to more consistently help you win championships?
 
No it is merely exhibit 1,894 of you desperately trying to look like the smartest guy in the room.
I'm not the smartest guy in the room.

However, I probably have a stronger grasp of this discussion, the metrics involved in player success in recruiting and how it relates to Texas football better than anyone on the planet.

Having a PHD in one thing doesn't mean you're the smartest person in the world. It just means you are an expert in a particular field.
 
Would you rather have a 3 or low tier 4 star freshman take a roster spot who has a 1 in 10 chance of developing into a NFL prospect over a college sophomore that's shown he can play at the college level and manage school and everything else that goes along with it? Which do you think is going to more consistently help you win championships?
^^^^^^^^^
 
No it is merely exhibit 1,894 of you desperately trying to look like the smartest guy in the room.

I’m one of the five math nerds ketch is talking about

Five years from now any program not using the system he’s proposing here will be dinosaurs and fired of the 85 man limit still exists
 
  • Like
Reactions: ryano013
He and Chase Daniel were a hell of a 1-2 punch in that year.

yep. Daniel is also a high character person. Gary Pinkel didn't need to worry about him. given what he started with Pinkel did a very good job at Mizzzu. these days they probably would have fired him after the 2004 season. that would have been a mistake given what he accomplished from 2005 to 2011 in the Big 12. too bad he had to retire for health reasons after the 2015 season.
 
yep. Daniel is also a high character person. Gary Pinkel didn't need to worry about him. given what he started with Pinkel did a very good job at Mizzzu. these days they probably would have fired him after the 2004 season. that would have been a mistake given what he accomplished from 2005 to 2011 in the Big 12. too bad he had to retire for health reasons after the 2015 season.
There was a guy that Texas was recruiting in 2008 or 2009... I can't remember, but he was a super religious kid and his family was worried about him coming on his official visit to Texas.

So, when he arrived he the coaches put him with Colt and Jordan. They took him bowling, while everyone else that weekend got buck wild. They drank milk. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: rrunt and SR60
I typically change the topic every week.

I've been thinking of writing this piece for about 2 months, so I'm pretty sure the redundancy is minimal, other than me talking about in conversation on the board.
Geoff - No issues here with me. If the majority of your readers like this continuing analysis, stick with it. Best, Evytime
 
A three star football player who did not get drafted married my college sweetheart and I am stilled pissed. He thinks he is a macho guy because he played football at UT. Wasn't all conference, didn't play much. Did I mentioned I am still pissed? And they ended up getting a divorce. Did I mention I am stilled pissed?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WhatAboutEggs
Geoff - No issues here with me. If the majority of your readers like this continuing analysis, stick with it. Best, Evytime
Hey, the off-season is almost over. ;)

Looking forward to writing about football on the field.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT