ADVERTISEMENT

Ketch's 10 Thoughts From The Weekend (Saying what needs to be said)

I guess I don't understand what you're saying here. I thought that you said you slotted Oregon ahead of Texas based on the eyeball test. I may have missed something.

Oh, I'm all over the place in compiling the top 10.

My Regardless of Resume/Record Test is as follows.

1. Georgia
2. Alabama
3. Oregon
4. Texas
5. Michigan
6. Washington
7. Ohio State
8. FSU
 
But wouldnt that be easier to explain than leaving out Bama, who would have the same record, the SEC Championship, and H2H over them in the last week of the season? Bama is the part of it I’m caught up on tbh, and the results would have to trump what they believe at the point. Who knows 🤷🏻‍♂️
I just can't see them dropping UGA to 5. That's a big drop.
 
"Although this season has gone by in the blink of an eye, it has already given Orangebloods so much in the way of memories. Beating Alabama will remain in our collective hearts and souls as an all-time reawakening. Making sure that the likes of Baylor, TCU, Texas Tech and the rest of the blood-sucking ticks that represent the Big 12 from having any eternal scoreboard is borderline priceless. Chasing a first-ever playoff bid has reminded so many people why they commit so much of themselves to being a fan in the first place."

For the Road-Warriors among us, I assure you that eternal scoreboard against the blood-sucking ticks as Ketch calls them is as big a deal as making the playoffs.

This year was especially bad at Iowa State.

As Scott Wilson always says. "Fan Appreciation Day should be held in Ames, Iowa."
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ketchum
Oregon has definitely run up more impressive stats in blowouts of bad teams.
I'd like to have seen that from Texas.

Beating Utah by 29, Washington State by 16 and Oregon State by 24

is more or less impressive than...

Beating Kansas State by 3, Iowa State by 10 and TCU by 3?
 
Nice Brewster’s Millions reference. Great childhood movie.

Surprised that you also would have Oregon over Texas. All the metrics favor Texas - strength of schedule, common opponent (Tech), Best win (Bama), etc.
Are those all the metrics?
 
That’s a big ass zip code
Alabama beat LSU 42-28 after being tied 28-28 in the third quarter.

Alabama is a better win, but LSU is right near the top of the tier after the top 8.

They've lost to No.5, No.8 and No.9... none at home.

Wining at Missouri is a hell of a win.
 
He’s not better than Tech’s Brooks. Fill the gaps and swarm to him and it will be fine. Gordon is truly the only stud on that offense.
Exactly. Tech’s Brooks is a beast. I watched him last week and he was a tank to get down.
As stated by Type O, get to him before he gets his motor to second or third gear….our strength.

That said, we need to play Bama and Tech intensity ball the remainder of this season. We do that and we can definitely beat anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Type O
Ketch, if Texas wins and Georgia loses, Texas would have both the conference champion advantage and the victory over a common opponent (Bama) that Georgia just lost to. I can't see the committee doing that, but if it does they have just lost any credibility they have left.

Would there be any precedent for such a move and what is the most egregious example of the committee ignoring their own criteria in the selection?

By the way, great write up. Thank you.
I just don't think they'll leave the team they think is a clear No.1 completely out of the final four. THAT would be quite a new precedent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: utbums
Oregon over Texas is complete bs. Here is the playoff criteria: conference championships (both), strength of schedule (Texas), head-to-head results (N/A), and comparison of results against common opponents (Texas). There is no playoff criteria that favors Oregon over Texas. You should be standing up to this and calling it out instead of pandering to it. Not to mention, we also have the best win.
Do you think Vegas would favor Texas?
 
So Oregon and Bama should be in over Texas because of the eyeball test, and FSU sans QB1 because of resume.

In what world does that make sense?
I didn't say it made sense with regards to how teams actually get in.
 
"Although this season has gone by in the blink of an eye, it has already given Orangebloods so much in the way of memories. Beating Alabama will remain in our collective hearts and souls as an all-time reawakening. Making sure that the likes of Baylor, TCU, Texas Tech and the rest of the blood-sucking ticks that represent the Big 12 from having any eternal scoreboard is borderline priceless. Chasing a first-ever playoff bid has reminded so many people why they commit so much of themselves to being a fan in the first place."

For the Road-Warriors among us, I assure you that eternal scoreboard against the blood-sucking ticks as Ketch calls them is as big a deal as making the playoffs.

This year was especially bad at Iowa State.

As Scott Wilson always says. "Fan Appreciation Day should be held in Ames, Iowa."
That's a great line.
 
Exactly. Tech’s Brooks is a beast. I watched him last week and he was a tank to get down.
As stated by Type O, get to him before he gets his motor to second or third gear….our strength.

That said, we need to play Bama and Tech intensity ball the remainder of this season. We do that and we can definitely beat anyone.
agreed
 
Oregon will not get in over FSU. If FSU wins they are in guaranteed. Undefeated and conference champion you are in. If oregon wins we get left oout and its GA, Oregon, FSU and Washington.
Wuuuut?
No team that didn’t win their conference is getting in over Texas (assuming we take care of business)……not the way things sit today. That you can take to the bank.
 
  • Like
Reactions: utbums
Sometimes you have no idea what you’re talking about because you’re not a Longhorn.

This is one of those times.

You know I went to UT as a student, right?

If you disagree and want to make a wager on it, I can think of some terms.
 
Love seeing Trading Places here- top notch movie and absolutely a Christmas movie I don’t care what anyone says.

Really disappointed Florida choked the second half this weekend but hey, they are a bad team and relying on bad teams to come through is not a winning formula (ask the Sooners regarding BYU.)

If Texas beats OSU and FSU loses to Louisville (which I would not bet on for a second, but gladly hope for) I think Texas gets in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ketchum
UGA wins and FSU loses. It's that simple and most likely.
A 2 game parlay (Georgia ML & Louisville ML) is not as simple as a single game ML bet on Bama.

Vegas agrees with that, which is why the payout is larger on the parlay. Plus, in this parlay you’re betting on a 5 point favorite and a 3.5 point underdog to both win, so it’s not as simple as you say.

If Bama, a 5 point underdog wins, Texas is in. That is the simple path to the CFP.
 
A 2 game parlay (Georgia ML & Louisville ML) is not as simple as a single game ML bet on Bama.

Vegas agrees with that, which is why the payout is larger on the parlay. Plus, in this parlay you’re betting on a 5 point favorite and a 3.5 point underdog to both win, so it’s not as simple as you say.

If Bama, a 5 point underdog wins, Texas is in. That is the simple path to the CFP.

If you think Bama beating UGA leaves an uncontested door open for Texas, then there's nothing really left to discuss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tlcdownunder2
TCU would have been a considerable underdog in Vegas to both OSU and Bama, the teams ranked right behind them. They also would have likely been dogs to some others.

Point being, what Vegas would say isn’t really part of the criteria. Otherwise, what happens on the field wouldn’t really matter.
 
Based on the last two months, I'd simply say I disagree.

They'd have a big quarterback advantage.
I completely disagree with Ketch about a big QB difference between us and Oregon. We have a more complete team than Oregon.. We'd beat them by 10 on a neutral field.
 
If you think Bama beating UGA leaves an uncontested door open for Texas, then there's nothing really left to discuss.
I think in that case FSU would be the one squeezed. You simply can’t squeeze a conference champ Texas in favor of the team it beat AND a non conference champ who lost to the team it beat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeteMoss24
Im curious about the rationale. If both Big 12 and Pac12 winners have 1 loss, why would Pac12 trump the Big 12 automatically?

Our SOS would be better, our best win would be better.
Look - I hate it as much as anyone but the fact that Oregon lost by 3 @Wash (their loss would still be better than ours after they beat them in Pac10….ie, Wash will stay ahead of OU) and then beats them on a neutral field for the CC puts them above us.

That’s why ideally OU would be 11-0 right now. Then we beat them and I’d absolutely contend we deserve to be above Oregon. That said, their loss would be easier looked upon since away. Our loss is better than losing at home (Bama - why they can’t jump us) but still not as good as losing on the road.

Speaking of this rationale, it’s why I expect Ohio State to be ahead of us come Tuesday. However, we’ll jump them when we have a Conference Title to boast (and they don’t).
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Armadillo Slim
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT