Hold up.... we are talking about Blake right now--- not some 17 year old dude. This is a squirrel move. (Look! A squirrel!)
Now-- Let's address the 17 year old punk you speak of.
If Jacob Blake and the media would have been HONEST about the fact that he had a weapon on him-- do you think the "public" would have been like "ehhhh........ dude had a knife and was fighting with the cops....... maybe that's dumb...... maybe he wouldn't have been shot--- if he didn't brandish a knife..."
Or do you think the "public" would have been like "fvck it! Burn baby burn!" anyway?
I think the public would have said "well-- dumbass shouldn't have come at the cops with a weapon" and that would have been that.
No protests, no further violence with regard to THIS incident.
No 17 year old "punk" would have shot anyone-- if Blake and the media were honest.
But they weren't. And BECAUSE the media lied, the 17 year old ended up doing what he did. When in reality, he'd have probably been at home in bed.
Now, I ask you, who were the bad actors that instigated this entire exchange of violence?
Look here--
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/5653800002
This is USA Today saying Jan 5 that he did NOT have a knife.
2 weeks later, in front of Michael Strahan, on the Today Show-- he ADMITS he had a knife.
The media flat the fvck out lied to you and me. Can't you see this was a manipulation? He admitted he had a knife and here is one of the most "trusted" news organizations saying he didn't. Do you think USA Today has retracted this story? Nope. They haven't.
Here's Yahoo news correcting the lie.
In his first television interview since being shot in the back by police, Jacob Blake admitted that he not only had a knife in his possession at the time of the shooting, but also “dropped” it before picking it up again. “I realized I had dropped my knife, had a little pocket knife. So I picked...
www.google.com