It's misguided to only highlight the "contributors", while not highlighting the guys that absolutely had the talent to be significant ones with added development. For instance, you highlighted two guys alone in 2014 that wouldn't have been as good as some others in that same year had they developed properly.To hammer home my point in my previous reply, I've highlighted the guys who legitimately could be described as contributors. TEN of 67. In other words, a LOT of dead weight cut loose.
Kendall Sanders, as an example.