no doubtWhich is good because it wasn't exactly considered a major hit nor did it achieve critical acclaim up on its release.
no doubtWhich is good because it wasn't exactly considered a major hit nor did it achieve critical acclaim up on its release.
Yes, sir. I deserved to be banished for violating Article I of the man card code. The shame is unbearable.Just go ahead and turn in your man card. You can request return of it from the Mods following an insightful football post and/or posts referencing hot cheerleaders.
Post has been deleted. Sorry for not noticing the picture. I couldn't make it out without clicking on it.The first post following your OP. The avatar and sig of the poster has a photo of a lynching. Presumably in the South. It's atrocious and completely unacceptable for this forum.
The poster's handle is @Prosperity
Hmmm...stout, at least until they tired against the run in the 2nd half from being on the field all day and they saw the TCU aerial blitz. Definitely top two in the Big 12 regardless of what the stats said.
Post has been deleted. Sorry for not noticing the picture. I couldn't make it out without clicking on it.
Ketch: you've been consistently saying UT won't extend the GOR and the Big 12 is dead man walking, which is music to my ears. But, you haven't said what our most likely landing place is...is that because our administration doesn't truly know yet, they haven't told anybody yet, or you're not letting us know what you're hearing?
QUOTE]
Neither Ketch nor any other media person is going to know what the UT powers-that-be really intend.
Over the past 30 years, UT has made it a practice to not to reveal its true intentions, and on occasion to even deceive the public if it enhances our leverage. An excellent example of that was Chip Brown purposted big scoop on Orangebloods that Texas was going to the PAC. In fact UT was only playing Chip about the PAC to lever ESPN and Fox to sweeten the Big 12 TV deals and ESPN to do the LHN.
I'm not sure I'd agree thatam I wrong?
I'm more argumentative without supporting facts on Mondays.Hmmm...
Was it stout vs. BYU? Or Iowa State? Or TCU?
There were too many non-stout performances mixed in there for me to call it stout.
I dunno. The evolution that takes place in the first film is his best work, slightly over II.I'm not sure I'd agree that
Pacino I > Pacino II
Two different transitions. Michael changes in both movies. Both are remarkable performances. That final closing shot of Michael in Part II - those black, lost, dead eyes, just get me every time I see it.
I'll concede Brando being more memorable as Don Vito.
I think they're too different to judge one better than the other, though Part I has more obvious changes and turning points, but the subtleties at work in Part II are no less impressive in my view. I can't really choose one over the other. Both are indispensable. Two incredible performances. Two incredible films.I dunno. The evolution that takes place in the first film is his best work, slightly over II.
I dunno bout that.Bedford could probably get away with starting 11 Dylan Haines before Charlie fired him.
Vance Bedford is not "on the hot seat" because our defense was awesome in 2014.
Remember in 2014 when we had a top 25 defense and there was nfl talent on the roster?
Bedfords 2014 defense was definately not embarrassing or poo poo.
Maybe bc he actually had some talent to work with.
Nfl talent 2014 - Malcolm brown(1st round), hicks(Roy candidate), diggs(legendary veteran leader), mykelle
Nfl talent 2015 - ridgeway
our defense struggled last year bc our qb always tucked and ran instead of reading the d and throwing the ball. When offense can't sustain drives and is 3 and out every time then defensive stats suffer.
Imo this "hot take" trying to scapegoat Bedford on the "hot seat" is garbage.
... Otherwise great work as usual. Keep the info coming. Can't get enough of the updates
After listening to Strong tell the world that he had no play-calling responsibilities on the defensive side of the ball and that he lets his coordinators lead the way, it was impossible to ignore the message that Strong seemed to be sending, which is that a second straight season of disappointment on that side of the ball won’t stand, regardless of how many games this team wins. After what happened with Shawn Watson a year ago, we all know Strong is not going to put anyone in front of him in the survival line.
okSomeone has been saying this for quite some time now only to be told otherwise.
When you get more complaints about your soccer insights than you do the picture of half naked Yankees, something has gone terribly wrong.Can't believe there haven't been any thoughts on Fantasy Football.
I'm glad that nobody took the bait on the half naked Yankees. Who wants to talk about that?When you get more complaints about your soccer insights than you do the picture of half naked Yankees, something has gone terribly wrong.
it's not the talking that would scare me.I'm glad that nobody took the bait on the half naked Yankees. Who wants to talk about that?
Given that Clarissa Davis absolutely punked BOTH Miller and Cooper as an 18-year old frosh, it's a damn shame she doesn't full careers matter