So you expected my response to your emotional tirade to be one based on facts?
well at least you know me though you certainly trigger easily.
You have not made a case for McNabb. . .perhaps that is because you have looked at the facts, realized there is no case but it's the net, never admit you are wrong.
Go ahead and pick one of the 9 other QBs McNabb is not better than.
The complete lack of understanding of the impact on the game Joe Namath had shows me your opinion on the issue is goofy at best. Though I suspect
Namath changed the game. Nothing about Donovan was "revolutionary" or "for the ages"
Joe played in an era where DBs could literally mug WRs, where QBs did not "check down" every pass. The game was wide open and QBs threw deep and Joe was VERY good at it.
You put Joe in a modern offense with WRs who cannot be touched by DBs and his numbers would have been ridiculous.
Other thing to keep in mind, there were not rules to protect QBs in Joe's era like they are today
NFL QBs are also largely measured by what they do in the playoffs. Donovan was nothing special. Joe beat the "best team in football"
McNabb was a good but not HOF QB
He's not better than Romo Rivers Ryan etc......none of them HOF worthy either. In fact his QB rating is below virtually every quality QB since the turn of the century (this era)
He is certainly not in the same class as Brady, Rodgers Farve (already in) Big Ben (on the field anyway) Brees. All 21st century QBs who deserve the Hall.
PS, a piece of advice, this board is better when you leave politics out. . . any politics. The comment you made was dumb, off point and only served to anger a pretty large portion of customers.
I get it ,you don't want to hear it.