ImpliesIt certainly wasn't anything I directly said or you could quote it.
ImpliesIt certainly wasn't anything I directly said or you could quote it.
good idea.
It's so much more than that.(Sell) It's a million things and not just one or two. It's all of those things and more. This isn't an uncomplicated rebuild.
Wrong. There are fundamental problems with the psyche of this program. 12 years of swings between mediocre and terrible has damaged the entire structure. They expect bad things to happen and to lose. THAT is hard to reverse.
The situation leads to the implication, not the words calling out its existence.Implies
Why stir up a QB controversy right now? You posted Casey’s last 12 quarters of ratings, yet did not post Hudson’s 6 quarters of ratings?Who did I say in this column should be the starter?
I'll hang up and listen.
I am not calling for Card to play a single down against Baylor if Thompson plays well. I'm of the opinion that Card possibly playing needs to be on the table if he doesn't.
I don't?
Not based on this....As for Card, I haven't heard a lot of loud whispers about discontent from Lakeway since he got the hook in the third quarter against Arkansas. He's kept his head down and seemingly been a pretty good soldier. Still, if I'm Card I'd personally have some questions about the following:
a. When Thompson had a statistically worse half of football vs. TCU than Card had in the first half against Arkansas, Card didn't sniff the field, which would have been an eye-opener for a player likely being told that he needs to prepare like he's a starter because you'll never know when he might be needed ... except apparently really poor play by Thompson isn't when he's needed.
b. Why was Sarkisian so vocally supportive of Thompson when he named Card the starter at quarterback, even to the extent of mostly talking Thompson up and publicly selling him on staying (and not transferring) instead of talking about Card on the day Card actually won the job, but hasn't done the same for Card since the job switched hands?
Right or wrong, I would absolutely feel like I'm in the process of being treated wildly different than Thompson was when the shoe was on the other foot. It would put me in a position where I'd be wondering if I truly have a future in Austin playing football.
Why stir up a QB controversy right now? You posted Casey’s last 12 quarters of ratings, yet did not post Hudson’s 6 quarters of ratings?
You also never mentioned Casey leads the big 12 in passing touchdowns nor that Bijan’s rushing yards per game has gone up significantly since Casey became the starter.
Why are you painting Casey in a bad light and omitting other key stats?
I would be careful to assume that because I am saying there hasn't been anywhere near the behind the scenes volume that existed when Thompson was the back-up quarterback as the same thing as me not knowing anything about the situation.Not based on this....
it's your opinion based on how you would feel.
If you know of the conversations between Card and Sark then lets stop speculating and let's hear what you've heard.
Then you are implying there is more to the 'different' treatment then you're letting on.I would be careful to assume that because I am saying there hasn't been anywhere near the behind the scenes volume that existed when Thompson was the back-up quarterback as the same thing as me not knowing anything about the situation.
I mean... is anyone under the impression that anyone or anything connected to Card is anything other than frustrated?Then you are implying there is more to the 'different' treatment then you're letting on.
Do you know he is frustrated or is it assumed?I mean... is anyone under the impression that anyone or anything connected to Card is anything other than frustrated?
Yes, I know.Do you know he is frustrated or is it assumed?
If you know then you know but that isn't what you keep saying.
Oh, it's a problem that ain't going away just because. I'm still stunned that Sarkisian watched the group in the spring and was like, "We're good."
amenIm just going to assume if I look at your last 11 years you never bit the apple on that "we look good against each other" mess, but we sure have .. over, and over, and over again.
I know Sark gets paid the big bucks but I can see why shit vs shit looked good. We the fans fell for it for years. Its hard to come to terms even now with the richest school with the most resources blowing what has to be dozens of evaluations.
Awful on awful looks ok apparently. Lets hope that banana peel doesnt get slipped on again
Except Casey has proven it {he's not the guy} over 12 quarters whereas an inexperienced Card only had 2 + quarters before he was benched, and arguably, prematurely at that.It’s harder to lead when your teammates believe you’re visibly shaken and not ready for the moment 🤷🏾♂️
I had to make a correction.
Thompson had a -50 rating in the 4th quarter on Saturday, but Suchomel thought it was impossible to have a negative rating, so he changed it.
The actual rating in the 4th quarter was -50.
Hell, 2 options?? With that OL first guy not open you better take off!I truly believe that he's been instructed to go through 4 progressions before seeking to run and the O line can't give him time.I'd say go through the first two and then run, with this line he doesn't haven the luxury of a lot of time.He needs to scramble like Sam did
To be fair, he only threw two passes for zero yards, one of which was a pick.Wow….yet Anwar says he was “right” or that Card was rattled and nobody has confidence in him anymore.
-50….freaking abysmal and a joke by mods to not have the same conversation about Casey that they had after Cards one bad game
THEN MAKE SURE YOUR GUY ASKS IT. Instead of the typical asinine stuffGreat question for tomorrow's pc.
What is the worst possible rating? It can’t be much lower right? I guess if he was 0/2 with 2 picks.To be fair, he only threw two passes for zero yards, one of which was a pick.
But, the rating is real. You can actually have a -50.
Hold up. So was Casey ready for the moment this second half after the pick 6? Or was he visibly shaken like Card? You can’t have it both ways Anwar.It’s harder to lead when your teammates believe you’re visibly shaken and not ready for the moment 🤷🏾♂️
He hands it off to Bijan so much differently?Not sure he defeats TCU
THIS! It’s so weird that Card is held to a different standard and he is a REDSHIRT FRESHMAN! Casey has been awful more than he has been good against real opponents. He’s turned the ball over and he hasn’t quite “rallied the team”. He was rattled at home. Anwar and Ketch need to dive into this on the pod today. Why is Card held to a different standard?Wow….yet Anwar says he was “right” or that Card was rattled and nobody has confidence in him anymore.
-50….freaking abysmal and a joke by mods to not have the same conversation about Casey that they had after Cards one bad game
So why Hudson Card?From the column: "On one hand, Thompson is currently the Big 12's leading passer in efficiency and is one game removed from posting the single-best half of football that any quarterback in the history of the program has ever had against its No. 1 rival."
Calling Casey’s performance a “dip” is drastically understating it. He has been terrible.So why Hudson Card?
We play 2 top 10 teams in back to back weeks and you’re calling out Casey’s performance dips? Isn’t that sort of expected?
What has changed with Hudson Card that you think we should put him back in at quarterback if Casey struggles against Baylor? Didn’t Iowa St’s senior quarterback also struggle against Baylor?
If I’m following your logic, once we build a large lead at halftime against Baylor, and if Casey struggles in the 3rd quarter again, you’re saying to put in Hudson Card at quarterback because that will resolve Texas blowing a double digit lead in the 4th quarter again? Please elaborate on that 🤣🤣
Casey played against better teams than Hudson, and he still has better stats year to date than Hudson.Hold up. So was Casey ready for the moment this second half after the pick 6? Or was he visibly shaken like Card? You can’t have it both ways Anwar.
He’s played against two top 10 teams in back to back weeks.Calling Casey’s performance a “dip” is drastically understating it. He has been terrible.
Anthony Cook?It's seems to me like once a recruit ( OL especially) gets on campus and is poorly coached and developed for 2 or 3 years that it's too late for them to recover. Does that make sense? example Tyler Johnson and Isaiah Hookfin.
You are objectively wrong about this. Casey damn near cost us the TCU game with his awful decision making and lack of accuracy. He flat out cost us the game this weekend and he folded in the second half when adversity struck. Ketch isn’t stirring up anything. He has mentioned the 4th quarter meltdowns and guess what? Casey has been historically terrible in the 4th quarters of meaningful games. Not to mention the turnovers. If you think Casey is the answer at QB then I can’t help you.Casey played against better teams than Hudson, and he still has better stats year to date than Hudson.
Casey threw 5 touchdown passes and had a career day against a top 5 program and rival.
Hudson Card folded against Arky, who at last check isn’t even a top team in the SEC West.
Apples and oranges, Anwar is correct here. Ketchum is the one stirring up controversies by not addressing why the team has blown double digit leads in the 4th quarter in back to back weeks against top 10 teams.
Confused isn’t the word I’d use. Uncomfortable/rushed and hurt come more to mind. He made some great reads at times (Bijan TD), made a nice couple of throws, but also sailed some balls and held onto it way too long at times also. It was not a good day for him and the playcalling in the 2nd half coupled with penalties and no line didn’t help. Casey is a temperamental thrower but I think he at least generally knows where to go with the ball. He definitely has some miscues too trying to force throws.He looked pretty confused on Sat. I am not sure he could have played any worse.
0 for 2 with 2 picks is -200.What is the worst possible rating? It can’t be much lower right? I guess if he was 0/2 with 2 picks.
Your head is buried in the sand. Casey was terrible against TCU, bad in the second half of OU, and terrible against Oklahoma state. That’s all there really is to it.He’s played against two top 10 teams in back to back weeks.
He had the game of a lifetime (even with the second half dip) against OU. It wasn’t Casey’s fault that we lost against OU.
What has Hudson Card done to show he’s better than the leader in passing touchdowns and efficiency in the Big 12?
Totally agree- And Card actually played a near perfect game against ULL. You develop the guy with the higher ceiling. That’s why he was named starter to begin with. If people hold the Arky game against Card, then they also need to hold the TCU, OK State games against Thompson. Starting to believe the two quarters against Oklahoma was a total outlier. And you can essentially throw away Casey’s Rice and Tech performances.Your head is buried in the sand. Casey was terrible against TCU, bad in the second half of OU, and terrible against Oklahoma state. That’s all there really is to it.
What has card done? I don’t know, because we haven’t seen him. He certainly can’t be worse than Casey has been.