and you sited a column and a lede paragraph that has nothing to do with either?
You would categorize Herman's recruiting here as a success with no discussion or nuance considering this class?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and you sited a column and a lede paragraph that has nothing to do with either?
No, but we know what divisive race-baiters think:Do we know what Montrezl Harrell thought of it?
until he gets married.....I think it’s time to start discussing Scottie Scheffler in place of Jordan Spieth.
Yup, he certainly was last year.Hard to disagree. As much as people want to STILL tout Caden Sterns and BJ Foster, the simple fact is currently Brown is a superior player to both.
even with an open wide depth chart to sell...Completely warranted. Obviously our sh*tting OL recruiting for '21 isn't helping.
That depressed me.Please let one or even both be in the mold of a Rod Wright or better yet, Shaun Rogers. First time in a long time we've had non-tweener monster inside DL guys who can also move. Malcom Brown is the only recent one and he's quite frankly not been that recent.
Like I said, it's not a heavy sell. It's just this Monday's mood of the room. Next Monday is around the corner.A year ago did you get the sense Herman was looking to move Todd Orlando (along with 6 other assistants)?
How different might Chris Simms' career have looked if Richard Walton doesn't get hurt in 1998?Let's also not forget that Applehwite's path to the starting job in '98 was cleared by 2 injuries to the top of an already thin depth chart. Quite honestly, if Charles Wright WERE Applewhite, he'd still probably never see the field as a starter in his career given what's ahead of him not to mention what's coming.
I read his lips... "bitch ass white boy is goooooood."Do we know what Montrezl Harrell thought of it?
SMH. Man, some people just want to be noticed more than they want to be respected.No, but we know what divisive race-baiters think:
Is socioeconomic status of high star recruits one you’d rather talk about?No, I don't think you've thought this one out.
I think it's been made very clear what opinions of mine are wanted and not wanted on this board.
Take your shit to the Corral or find another topic to bark to the moon about.
They hit at levels that were consistent with the normal metrics.Lots of woof in that list. I'm sorry, but from a CFB perspective, at least half of those were busts in college relative to expectations.
How different might Chris Simms' career have looked if Richard Walton doesn't get hurt in 1998?
probablyI would say you can throw a washcloth over Jamison, Brown and Coburn spots #2 - #4 after Ossai.
That kid had a hell of a sophomore season and then the roof caved in on him.I have 2 recollections of Bobby Reid
1. He heaved at least 2 passes into the stands to avoid sacks at DKR in whatever year
2. He was the inspiration for:
Can you quote the exact thing you have an issue with?You would categorize Herman's recruiting here as a success with no discussion or nuance considering this class?
It's not really a big deal. I can't help it that the word "socioeconomic" puts you on tilt, despite there being zero reason for it to cause you to be on tilt. That's a you problem, not a me problem.Is socioeconomic status of high star recruits one you’d rather talk about?
He's never hated from jumpstreet in the minds of many IMO. It all could have been different.Interesting thought for sure.
Can you quote the exact thing you have an issue with?
It's not really a big deal. I can't help it that the word "socioeconomic" puts you on tilt, despite there being zero reason for it to cause you to be on tilt. That's a you problem, not a me problem.
You masking it with my mod ranking as some sort of excuse... is again... about you.
He HAS had success as a recruiter.In the first two paragraphs of fluff (Press Agent crap) that shouldn't even be in this article it states "He has been successful as a recruiter."
He HAS had success as a recruiter.
The 2021 class isn't complete and Anwar seems to come from the vantage point that he'll make his big picture thoughts on something when the hay is in the barn and not when the hay is being collected.
Literally, in the same thread someone points out the struggles of the 2021 class and offensive line recruiting and Anwar wrote, "I feel you" or something to that extent.
This just seems like a weird beef. JMO.
"When we lost the Brockermeyer brothers - Jason talks about how the O-line class could still be successful with Bird and Foster, says we don't lead for either but that we're in the recruitment for both....doesn't talk about how extremely long a shot we are with Foster (and were at the time / that % on the recruiting board is full of it) - or how we aren't exactly trending well with Bird at that time either / admitting it now but not then."No thoughts on Jason and the Oline class comments? I haven't gone back to find the exact post but feel my summary is very close to accurate
I feel like this is a protest vote because I'm a shitty friend.
"When we lost the Brockermeyer brothers - Jason talks about how the O-line class could still be successful with Bird and Foster, says we don't lead for either but that we're in the recruitment for both....doesn't talk about how extremely long a shot we are with Foster (and were at the time / that % on the recruiting board is full of it) - or how we aren't exactly trending well with Bird at that time either / admitting it now but not then."
a. Texas privately feels like it leads with Byrd. Just an FYI.
b. He has Byrd and Foster listed at below 50-percent in the most recent recruiting board.
c. They are very much in the recruitments of both.
d. I think he's been more realistic about Foster than anyone else in this market by a country mile. He's been telling people about OU's positioning for MONTHS.
This just feels like weird nitpicks. Believe me, I know about weird nitpicks.
I feel like you are only going to give someone a pass if they say something exactly how you want to be said. They are saying what you are saying, just not how you want it said, and I'm not sure how fair that is.